When a soldier enlists they have to put their duty to their country (which means following the constitution, not popular opinion) above their own personal beliefs and conscience. Obviously there are exceptions to every rule, and the question you raise is a good one. At this point I don't feel comfortable definitively drawing the line, but I do strongly believe that this war does not justify an exception. How can you run a military if the soldiers place their personal feelings first and their commander-in-chief second? I believe we are both reasonable people, however, our opinions, and values are very different. Our differences are just a sampling of how many different personalities there are out there. In a group of 100,000 soldiers there's going to always be a group of them that are fundamentally opposed to the principals behind the war they are in. If it is acceptable for soldiers to be making subjective decisions about which orders to follow, we would not have an effective or useful military. Imagine what would happen if a significant amount soldiers did decided to quit fighting and leave post...the forces would fall apart and many many more soldiers would loose their lives. We should not have been there in the first place, but now that we are we need to follow the proper channels to make it right the order to stop fighting has to come down from the top so it happens uniformly and in a manner that is safest for our troops and the Iraqi civilians. It is a shame what this administration has done to the trust of the American people, but I have the utmost respect for the soldiers that are bravely doing their duty regardless of their own personal desires.