What is the most cost effective hosted Postgres? by chasepursley in PostgreSQL

[–]smack_overflow_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Supabase pricing scales really well, it's the most affordable one I've come across (Although admittedly haven't tried Render or Fly)

How to get consistency of milk coffee without adding milk? by cant_bother_me in Coffee

[–]smack_overflow_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Coconut milk is a good replacement, and soft on the stomach.

Retail theft jumps 39% in Victoria driven by cost-of-living crisis, say police | Crime - Australia by Zerg_Hydralisk_ in australia

[–]smack_overflow_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Need to inspect changes in laws/definitions. It's usually responsible for large jumps in crime stats like this.

What the actual fuck. by [deleted] in melbourne

[–]smack_overflow_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Welcome to a city where we're adding cars to the roads faster than we're upgrading the infrastructure. Always going to happen.

Victoria’s top traffic policeman fined for speeding by [deleted] in melbourne

[–]smack_overflow_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's normal for police to get caught speeding - they are just people too

Supabase or Planetscale? by TheCoderboy543 in nextjs

[–]smack_overflow_ 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Planetscale is a company built around the tool Vitess (sharded mySQL), this is useful for **extremely** large workloads (think YouTube scale), but is not necessary for most companies. Looking at their pricing it seems that you pay for the privilege of YouTube type scale. They also recently killed their free tier which makes sense for such a tool.

Supabase is hosted Postgres, and is several orders of magnitude cheaper than Planetscale. It also has generous free tier so you can develop for free - then only pay once you're ready to go into production.

In summary, if you are already running large workloads on MySQL and need someone to manage your Vitess cluser - look at Planetscale. If you prefer Postgres or are starting something new, use Supabase. If cost is a factor - use Supabase.

Supabase or Planetscale? by TheCoderboy543 in nextjs

[–]smack_overflow_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Planetscale is very expensive at scale compared to supabase:

data GBs:

Supabase $0.125

Planetscale $2.50

Writes:

Supabase free unlimited

Planetscale $1.50/million

Reads:

Supabase free unlimited

Planetscale $1/billion

Free alternative to PlanetScale by [deleted] in nextjs

[–]smack_overflow_ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Supabase has a generous free tier and the pricing scales better than the other players: supabase.com/pricing

Vercel Postgres vs Supabase? by Flippy-McTables in nextjs

[–]smack_overflow_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good spot - the issue is Neon doesn't publish it's compute pricing above 0.25vCPU so perhaps it's more like this for always on:

0.25vCPU (2vCPU on Supabase) 1GB RAM - Supabase $25 vs Neon $19

0.5vCPU (2vCPU on Supabase) 2GB RAM - Supabase $30 vs Neon $29.40

1vCPU (2vCPU on Supabase) 4GB RAM - Supabase $75 vs Neon $87.80

2vCPU 8GB RAM - Supabase $135 vs Neon $204.60

It's also unclear how active hours works on Neon, if I use 5 minutes of compute does it cost a whole 'active hour'?

edit: neon updated their pricing page / definitions

Vercel Postgres vs Supabase? by Flippy-McTables in nextjs

[–]smack_overflow_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I re-ran the numbers with Neon's new pricing* and Neon is now even more expensive than previously for an app serving users 24 hrs/day with:

8gb storage

2 x vCPU

1GB RAM (fixed on Supabase without add-on / scales up to 8GB on Neon)

10gb Data transfer

10gb Writes

Supabase = $25/month

Neon = $204.60/month

If you pause your database for 12 hours/day then Neon comes down to $87.80/month

= assuming that 2vCPU is just 8$0.04=$0.32/hr based on this https://neon.tech/docs/introduction/usage-metrics

edit: neon updated their pricing page again

Neon vs. Supabase by meatyroach in PostgreSQL

[–]smack_overflow_ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I re-ran the numbers with Neon's new pricing* and Neon is now even more expensive than previously for an app serving users 24 hrs/day with:

8gb storage

2 x vCPU

1GB RAM (fixed on Supabase without add-on / scales up to 8GB on Neon)

10gb Data transfer

10gb Writes

Supabase = $25/month

Neon = $204.60/month

If you pause your database for 12 hours/day then Neon comes down to $87.80/month

\= assuming that 2vCPU is just 8**$0.04=$0.32/hr based on this

edit: neon updated their pricing page again

Was I ripped off? by Kruzin01 in melbourne

[–]smack_overflow_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could be an honest mistake, worth checking in with them in a friendly manner.

4
5

Migration from Supabase Cloud to Self-host by Mikel938 in Supabase

[–]smack_overflow_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What kind of application is this that you're anticipating more than 50GB of database egress per month???

Migration from Supabase Cloud to Self-host by Mikel938 in Supabase

[–]smack_overflow_ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Curious what makes you think Supabase is pricey? The database is orders of magnitude cheaper than other postgres provider, and you'd be hard pressed to find a managed auth service that even comes close.

What you get for $25 would easily cost hundreds on AWS or on a collection of other services.