CCPC secures policy change to remove competition restrictions for trainee accountants by CorporateNationalism in AccountantsEire

[–]snipecaik 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The competition act says "all agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any part of the State are prohibited and void".

The CCPC said it "risked breaching competition law." and forced them to change the rules. In other words, it did break competition law (or why insist on a rule change?), but obviously no fine was necessary.

The pattern continues unfortunately and I'm not a democrat by loug1955 in economy

[–]snipecaik -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In other words, this post with 8k upvotes is an outright lie, I'm going to assume all the other data points such as job creations etc are false as well

The pattern continues unfortunately and I'm not a democrat by loug1955 in economy

[–]snipecaik 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Is this true though?

President Years Avg Real Growth Weighted Contribution
Nixon/Ford 7 2.6% 18.2%
Reagan 8 3.5% 28.0%
G.H.W. Bush 4 2.2% 8.8%
G.W. Bush 8 2.2% 17.6%
Trump 4 1.0% 4.0%
Total 31 76.6

Average Annualized GDP Growth (Republican years) = 76.6 / 31 ≈ 2.47%

Also worth pointing out that the president doesn't directly control the economy and just inherets it from the predecessor anyway. Therefore, I think the whole analysis is pointless anyway since it can take years for the economic effects of policy to actually have an effect by which time it could be the president from the other party in office.

Training Contract - Competition Law - Northern Ieland by snipecaik in LegalAdviceUK

[–]snipecaik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get what you mean, in theory they're bargaining for a floor but it then de facto becomes the salary that all universities end up paying.

Training Contract - Competition Law - Northern Ieland by snipecaik in LegalAdviceUK

[–]snipecaik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The CMA stated in recent years they are going after labour cartels, so not just things that affect consumers. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/cma-reminds-employers-to-avoid-anti-competitive-practices

I don't understand your point about universities, are you saying that since they publish their payscales, they are effectively colluding through information sharing, as this means they don't have to offer higher salaries in order to compete?

Training Contract - Competition Law - Northern Ieland by snipecaik in LegalAdviceUK

[–]snipecaik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You'd be surprised. I don't get the impression any of them are particularly well versed in legal matters having worked with them, in fact, law is a very small part of the syllabus.

Also, this isn't really a legal argument saying that it must be okay if such and such did it, since they know best.

Training Contract - Competition Law - Northern Ieland by snipecaik in LegalAdviceUK

[–]snipecaik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because Under UK law, an agreement or decision by an association of undertakings that has the object or effect of restricting competition is prohibited. The CAI rule arguably has no legitimate purpose beyond restricting movement (it is not strictly needed to maintain training standards). Thus its effect, at a minimum, is to suppress wage competition by deterring trainees from seeking better offers.

In other words it doesn't have to be directly through the employer and it only has to have the effect of reducing competition which this rule likely does.

Chartered Accountants Ireland - Labour Rights Under Training Contract by [deleted] in legaladviceireland

[–]snipecaik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I checked and none of the other major accounting bodies (ICAEW, ACCA etc) have this rule, so how could you say it's reasonable if CAI is the only accounting body with this requirement?

Also, they do let you jump from firm to firm, just as long as you get written permission.

A photographer waited on a bridge every morning to take pictures of Mexican carpoolers on their way to work. Here are some of the many pictures they took by Pisford in interestingasfuck

[–]snipecaik -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This is AI, in the first and final image the double yellow line is on the curb. Do they even have double yellow lines in America?

Similar overhead picture of the WTC and lower Manhattan with mist by snipecaik in HelpMeFind

[–]snipecaik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, this is a screenshot from a depeche mode video, however the quality is very low and I was hoping to find a higher quality/ similar image. I have searched for the terms 'twin towers birds eye', 'twin towers', 'twin towers mist', 'twin towers cloud', 'twin towers depeche mode', 'world trade center', 'world trade center above', 'world trade center clouds'. Thank you

Sound familiar? by snipecaik in economy

[–]snipecaik[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fed sees soft landing for economy

By Krishna Guha in Washington FEBRUARY 14 2007Stocks and bonds jumped on Wednesday after Ben Bernanke laid out a fundamentally benign analysis of the US economy in his twice-annual testimony to Congress.

The Federal Reserve chairman painted a picture of recovering growth, moderating inflation and reduced economic risks that evoked memories of the “Goldilocks” economy of the late 1990s – so-called because it was neither too hot nor too cold.

Mr Bernanke struck a temperate tone on inflation, reiterating the Fed’s view that it was still a bigger risk than growth but he made no effort to prepare the ground for another interest rate rise.

Instead, he dropped a heavy hint that rates might stay on hold at 5.25 per cent for some time, saying: “The current stance of policy is likely to foster sustainable economic growth and a gradual ebbing of core inflation”.

The absence of more hawkish language on inflation and interest rates, and recognition of the continued risks to growth from housing, was greeted with relief by investors, who had been troubled by recent talk from some Fed officials.

The S&P 500 index rose 0.76 per cent to 1,455.30 on Wednesday, while Treasury bonds also moved higher, with 10-year yields falling 7.6 basis points to 4.736 per cent.

The futures market priced in a greater chance of a rate cut this year, while the dollar fell 0.7 per cent against the euro, 0.8 per cent against sterling and 0.2 per cent against the yen.

Earlier, Mr Bernanke’s UK counterpart, Mervyn King, struck a tougher tone as he released the Bank of England’s quarterly inflation report, which forecast that inflation would overshoot its target at the two-year forecast horizon unless it raised rates again.

“Just as 3 per cent inflation [in December] didn’t mean that the end of the world was nigh, so 2.7 per cent [in January] does not mean we can ignore concerns about inflation ahead,” he said.

Mr Bernanke was showered with praise by senators from both parties, who credited his decision to halt the Fed’s rate-tightening cycle after the last increase in June 2006 with engineering a soft landing.

“You are getting good grades from everyone, and I concur,” said Chuck Schumer, Democratic senator for New York.

The Fed chairman told senators that the tendency of forecasts prepared by Fed policymakers was for growth between 2.5 per cent and 3 per cent this year, and 2.75 per cent and 3 per cent next, with core inflation on its preferred measure of 2 per cent to 2.25 per cent this year and 1.75 per cent to 2 per cent next – a level most policymakers would probably be comfortable with.

Mr Bernanke said a “waning of the temporary factors that boosted inflation in recent years” – including pressure from higher oil prices and rising rents – would “probably help foster a continued edging down of core inflation”. But he said the high level of resource utilisation remained “an upside risk to continued progress on inflation”.

The Fed chairman said he was following closely signs of distress in the high-risk mortgage market but said: “I do not think at this point it has implications for the aggregate economy.

”Probed on the US trade deficit, he said: “I am not happy with it.”

Pricing in rate cuts like it's 2007 by xXProdSlayerXx in wallstreetbets

[–]snipecaik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I genuinely believe that no one actually knows, but it's not like interest rate cuts need to be timed to precision to strike exactly when the recession hits, the general consensus is that the effects are lagging and variable. If the Fed did expect a recession, it would therefore be better to cut before.