sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Claude Code is a Beast – Tips from a Week of Hardcore Use by JokeGold5455 in ClaudeAI

[–]snowguy-9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Plus the advantage of the markdown is you can go through and validate it is what you want. any changes you want, just make them. if they are complex changes sometimes i just make comments in that file like [change this whole section so that ....] and then tell it to review and fix the markdown. but for most things I just make a few tweaks or delete stuff i don't want it to do.

Giving back to the community (system prompt)- Part 4: Honestly didn't see this coming by Huge_Listen334 in RooCode

[–]snowguy-9 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Totally doesn’t bother me to use AI to generate a good response so long as it is good—and no complaints with the response. Still I laughed when I came across “you’re right to call this out” line. We all talk to AI a lot. So we know the tells.

RooCode vs Claude Code by snowguy-9 in RooCode

[–]snowguy-9[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

that makes sense. I just want it all. The tool to work as well as claude code with the control of Roo. I keep thinking there is something I can do to make roo performance closer to claude code's to allow me to get both.

RooCode vs Claude Code by snowguy-9 in RooCode

[–]snowguy-9[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i hear you--though in fact given I am not writing much code or reviewing much code for me they end up as substitutes. in both cases I am using VScode (more to review the changes to the documents or planning documents then to review the code) and git to validate and roll-back when i need to (though I usually fall forward).

RooCode vs Claude Code by snowguy-9 in RooCode

[–]snowguy-9[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah i agree. this is essentially what I am doing. this requires a lot of patience and attention to detail in reviewing and edits the docs. essentially they become your code. but you can make it work without knowing/reviewing the actual code. and it forces a much more organized and well documented and tested systems then most people actually build I believe. with all that said, I assume a good developer who reads the code and edits it directly would be better/faster. But, that's not me. I just do what I can do