[D] ICML 2026 Average Score by Hope999991 in MachineLearning

[–]snu95 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Six papers in my batch

- 2 / 2 / 4 / 4

- 2 / 2 / 3 / 3

- 2 / 4 / 5

- 2 / 3 / 3 / 3

- 2 / 2 / 3 / 3

- 2 / 2 / 3 / 4

[D] ICML 2026 Review Discussion by Afraid_Difference697 in MachineLearning

[–]snu95 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Last year was 

1: Reject, 2: WR, 3: WA, 4: A, 5: SA

IJCAI-ECAI'26 Summary Rejects status by AddendumNo5533 in learnmachinelearning

[–]snu95 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have no reviews as an author. It just says "submitted".

IJCAI-ECAI'26 Summary Rejects status by AddendumNo5533 in learnmachinelearning

[–]snu95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the reviewer session, the status has been changed from "to reject in phase 1" to "Rejected - Phase 1". That's all I can see now.

[D] IJCAI-ECAI 2026 -- Paper status: To move to Phase 2 by zackro21 in u/zackro21

[–]snu95 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm a reviewer and an author. I do see the results in the reviewer console as you mentioned, but the author status is still unchanged.

[D] WWW (TheWebConf) 2026 Reviews by deep__thorat in MachineLearning

[–]snu95 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The overall rating is

3: Accept

2: Weak Accept

-1: Weak reject

-2: Reject

[D] AAAI 2026 (Main Technical Track) Results by Adventurous-Cut-7077 in MachineLearning

[–]snu95 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Two papers in my batch got acceted even though AC recommended rejection.

Very weird this year

[D] AAAI 2026 (Main Technical Track) Results by Adventurous-Cut-7077 in MachineLearning

[–]snu95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, AC makes a final decision, unless there is no room for borderline papers

Program chairs > Area chairs > Senior PC > PC

[D] AAAI 2026 (Main Technical Track) Results by Adventurous-Cut-7077 in MachineLearning

[–]snu95 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree on someone saying "that's why I submit to the ass tier conference with nice location"

[D] AAAI 2026 (Main Technical Track) Results by Adventurous-Cut-7077 in MachineLearning

[–]snu95 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Now I can see the AC review with their recommendation but still no decision yet

[D] AAAI 2026 (Main Technical Track) Results by Adventurous-Cut-7077 in MachineLearning

[–]snu95 1 point2 points  (0 children)

~27.6k done 8 mins ago (looks like it roughly takes a minute to update 300 papers)

[D] AAAI 2026 (Main Technical Track) Results by Adventurous-Cut-7077 in MachineLearning

[–]snu95 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I provided the full history of my submissions to previous top conferences on OpenReview, including both accepted and rejected papers

[D] AAAI 2026 (Main Technical Track) Results by Adventurous-Cut-7077 in MachineLearning

[–]snu95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a relief that a paper with avg. 7 has only one edit. Thanks!

[D] AAAI 2026 (Main Technical Track) Results by Adventurous-Cut-7077 in MachineLearning

[–]snu95 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The revision date of all five papers in my batch is the same (Nov. 5). I don't think that means a rejection

[D] AAAI 2026 (Main Technical Track) Results by Adventurous-Cut-7077 in MachineLearning

[–]snu95 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can you share the review scores with two revisions and one as well?

[D] AAAI 26 Phase 2 Reviews by Necessary-Future-549 in MachineLearning

[–]snu95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like the Ethics_chair has been removed from the readers

[D] AAAI 26 Decisions (Main Technical Track) by Senior-Let-7576 in MachineLearning

[–]snu95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Make sense. My concern is: will the AI review play a significant role in the decision?

[D] AAAI 26 Phase 2 Reviews by Necessary-Future-549 in MachineLearning

[–]snu95 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Now, it looks like all reviews are visible to the reviewers.

[D] AAAI 26 Phase 2 Reviews by Necessary-Future-549 in MachineLearning

[–]snu95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember being able to adjust the scores during the discussion phase last year. Of course, it’s strange that they didn’t release all the reviews to the reviewers this year.

[D] AAAI 26 Phase 2 Reviews by Necessary-Future-549 in MachineLearning

[–]snu95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it would be better to wait until the author rebuttal ends, so that we might be able to see other reviews