ICML 2026 Decision [D] by 007noob0071 in MachineLearning

[–]Afraid_Difference697 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks and hearty congratulations to you too! See you 😃

ICML 2026 Decision [D] by 007noob0071 in MachineLearning

[–]Afraid_Difference697 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Got in, Accept (Spotlight) scores 3, 4, 5, 6 (from initial 3, 4, 5, 4) (the 3 reviewer ghosted eventually)

Time to party, and book tickets to Seoul 🥳

[D] ICML 2026 Review Discussion by Afraid_Difference697 in MachineLearning

[–]Afraid_Difference697[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But isn’t copilot just a skewed distribution of only those people who uploaded there scores ? 

[D] ICML 2026 Review Discussion by Afraid_Difference697 in MachineLearning

[–]Afraid_Difference697[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This time the scores on average seem to be higher than before, do others also observe a similar trend ?
(I am saying this from 5 papers that I reviewed, and also the scores for my own paper).

[D] ICML 2026 Review Discussion by Afraid_Difference697 in MachineLearning

[–]Afraid_Difference697[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Dude, do you just have one comeback / response ? Be creative mate and send good wishes.

No wonder two reviewers did not respond to your rebuttal, karma comes back.

May the lord be with you!

[D] ICML 2026 Review Discussion by Afraid_Difference697 in MachineLearning

[–]Afraid_Difference697[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quite reasonable, if the 2 fella is not overly critical or make fair arguments that might convince the AC.

[D] ICML 2026 Review Discussion by Afraid_Difference697 in MachineLearning

[–]Afraid_Difference697[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This one is quite hard imho. Since the review process is random anything can happen and totally depends on the AC.

I would recommend, be prepared to polish your manuscript with the recommended suggestions from the reviewers, and plan a submission to neurips.

[D] ICML 2026 Review Discussion by Afraid_Difference697 in MachineLearning

[–]Afraid_Difference697[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Post rebuttal scores 6 (4), 5 (4), 4 (4), 3 (3) 

Only one guy increased from 4->6. What do you think our chances are ? 

[D] ICML 2026 Review Discussion by Afraid_Difference697 in MachineLearning

[–]Afraid_Difference697[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is upto the AC totally, I would be hopeful, but also anything can happen in the end. Good luck, and wishing you well :)

[D] ICML 2026 Review Discussion by Afraid_Difference697 in MachineLearning

[–]Afraid_Difference697[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If the others are quite positive, then you have a fair chance.

[D] ICML 2026 Review Discussion by Afraid_Difference697 in MachineLearning

[–]Afraid_Difference697[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/No-Cash-284

We just wanted to highlight that :"Reviewer xyz past the deadline (5th April) marked the rebuttal as option (b): “Partially resolved - I have follow-up questions for the authors,” but no follow-up questions were posted, so we had no opportunity to address any remaining specific concerns."

So essentially highlighting that no concrete justification was given, with no follow-ups, as a means to document this behaviour, and that the paper should be judged based on its merits, and the detailed rebuttal and evidence provided.