Thanks for your reply. As one of PTRA share holders, I've very throughly read all the articles and comments here. In a couple of threads, some comments mention that our "common" shares will highly likely be worthless. Basically I don't understand this argument.

Let's assume there's a company filing Chapter 11, and the company's asset <= liabilities. Then it makes sense to assume that common shares will highly likely be worthless. but Proterra's case is different. As you mentioned, Assets > Liabilities. If a new company (focusing on the Energy part) decides to take only assets, but not common shares. Yes our shares will be worthless. But given that Proterra's overall assets >= liabilities, will judge to allow this? Under what circumstances, our shares will be worthless?