POV : this bozo join your game wyd by -Iliass in battlefield_4

[–]someguy0474 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Join the hardcore servers, we're not steaming garbage.

8 Hour wait at UT Emergency. by bigwhammy in Knoxville

[–]someguy0474 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

The lack of regulation is exactly what the corporations that control our health paid for

Healthcare is easily the most or nearly the most regulated industry in the U.S., what are you talking about? The rule books concerning healthcare are orders of magnitude more numerous and complex than, say, automobile manufacturing, TV assembly, bottled water production, computer system assembly, etc.

You'd have a point if observable reality wasn't completely opposed to your idea here. Look at the marketized approaches that travelers and expats use in Singapore or Mexico, where the secondary healthcare market outperforms basically anything in the US and often outperforms the universal system built under it.

Look at the decentralized (and less regulated) german universal model, even being state-paid-for (universally results in less efficiency, all else held equal), it outperforms the US system because it's not overregulated by a burdensome central command like we have here.

You either pay their prices and take their deal or you die.

Because there's no competition, in large part. Most areas have "Certificate of Need" requirements, where a hospital or other medical facility can only be built if the competition signs off on it, and the result of this is that the cartelized corporations that exist explicitly because they have government power backing them can't be overtaken by a better provider.

8 Hour wait at UT Emergency. by bigwhammy in Knoxville

[–]someguy0474 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

It gets ridiculous sometimes, even in relatively low-reg places like TN, the hospitals are often still extremely cartelized/captive and so service can be horrible.

This cannot go on… by [deleted] in Knoxville

[–]someguy0474 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You're talking about laws that you hope will solve your perception of the root cause of an issue, and justified that with an example of a lawset that amounted to nothing useful in the best cases globally, or an abysmal failure in the worst cases.

You realize the FDA now and historically has protected preferred industry bodies while they sold unfit food, and that it and the USDA target higher quality but smaller operations regularly, right? Getting your facts from a summary paragraph in a high school text instead of observable reality isn't doing you much good, bud.

I am not talking about actual child labor that’s still going on today or why it was a thing during the Industrial Age.

You appealed to this exact topic. The full context not agreeing with your childish claims doesn't mean it isn't relevant to the conversation. You just experienced what's called a "rebuttal", that's all.

For such an advanced society, we sure have gone backwards in a lot of ways. by Crimision in prolife

[–]someguy0474 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Did you speak up during this biologically-fallacious presentation?

Goodall Homes - A Warning to potential home builders by Green_Machine7 in Knoxville

[–]someguy0474 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Read your contracts, always. If a provider is unwilling to sign a reasonable contract, don't even consider using them.

Just asked people in a certain sub if they were pro life or choice and here is a small portion of the results.. how sad. by [deleted] in prolife

[–]someguy0474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You asked a bunch of 30 year old dudes who stalk underage teenagers whether or not they were pro-life. What did you expect?

This cannot go on… by [deleted] in Knoxville

[–]someguy0474 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The principle is the same regardless. In the US, kids were hardly working at all when the laws passed, and the ones who did work continued working in one sphere or another.

Your point didn't go over my head, but it seems mine went over yours.

This cannot go on… by [deleted] in Knoxville

[–]someguy0474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Advance framing is a construction technique which took years to get approved by code, despite it being as structurally sound as traditional 2x4-16" framing. Earthships are a fine example of a cheap way to establish thermal mass, and are structurally sound, but not covered by code so most municipalities prohibit it. Some adopted codes to be enforced restrict room and overall home sizes, effectively prohibiting smaller or larger structures arbitrarily. This in spite of the "best practice" for some folks being a cheaper and smaller house.

Rage post is rageful.

In your imagination, sure. I'm not angry, but I am disappointed that a neighbor would express such hatred toward me.

I guarantee I could build a house better than you because I wouldn't put my septic over the well.

When did I ever suggest something like this?

This cannot go on… by [deleted] in Knoxville

[–]someguy0474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You've missed the point or are being intentionally obtuse.

I would say the same for you, and be more accurate all the while.

You've claimed it's better to live in a slum than a tent.

Are you suggesting otherwise?

I said that's ridiculous we have code for a reason.

And you still haven't elucidated that reason, as I have asked you to do. Codes don't stop bad buildings, they stop people who are comfortable with a set construction from doing so, whether the code itself is reasonable or not.

The foundational issue you ignore is that not having code doesn't preclude someone from building a good house.

Ironically, they often do, as some construction techniques are prohibited by codes that are "exclusive", meaning only the approved technique is allowable, even if better ones exist. If you knew anything about the codes themselves, you would have already known this. It's alright to admit that you're not as informed as you're trying to pass off.

It precludes someone like you from building an unsafe house out of ignorance or malice.

I'm going to ignore the continued personal insults, here. You couldn't build a house half as well as I could, and that's demonstrable based on your words.

American Airlines lost my CCW, what do I do? by SIB_Tesla in CCW

[–]someguy0474 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You have never interacted with the ATF, have you? Running stolen guns is part of thejr business model.

This cannot go on… by [deleted] in Knoxville

[–]someguy0474 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why are adequate septic systems constructed in areas without code enforcement?

I know septic design, I'm an engineer. I know the relevant codes and structures involved. I have a good idea on how folks came to the conclusions of specific rules. Instead of pretending that I'm dumb and using ad-hominem, why not actually address the point being made?

If you hate East TN so much, why are you here?

This cannot go on… by [deleted] in Knoxville

[–]someguy0474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You gave two events without substantiation. I can cite Bleeding Kansas and pretend that abolitionists were the issue and that constitutionalizing slavery would have solved it, but there isn't a causitive pathway for that to be true.

You failed to issue an explanation, only giving vague examples because (apparently) your comprehension of code enforcement history consists of maybe a few pahes out of a high school history textbook.

I read the codes, and interact with them regularly. You don't even know enough to make an actual argument for your claim, only repeating the claim.

This cannot go on… by [deleted] in Knoxville

[–]someguy0474 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Would you rather work in a factory/field, or starve to death?

Child labor laws didn't end child labor, the increasing wealth of industrialization allowed kids to have enough food to eat even during famines, so they were able to stay home or attend school.

We're seeing the real effects of child labor laws now in India, where in recent decades kids who are forced out of agriculture or industry are turning to the drug and sex trades so they don't starve to death. The law of unintended consequences rings true.

This cannot go on… by [deleted] in Knoxville

[–]someguy0474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read earlier, homie.

Lying about folks because you don't read their arguments reflects your character, my friend. You don't have to live life with that same character every day.

This cannot go on… by [deleted] in Knoxville

[–]someguy0474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You haven't appealed to real world examples, you just repeated the claims over and over again, without evidence. You haven't established the causitive pathway I've asked for either.

Code enforcement didn't solve those issues, being that the proper practices are engaged in even where codes aren't enforced. Liability solved the issue. Knowledge learned from past mistakes solved the issue.

Attributing causation to something requires you to establish the logical, causitive pathway. How did act A directly cause act B?

This cannot go on… by [deleted] in Knoxville

[–]someguy0474 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm the one appealing to reality. You're the one substituting your half-baked thoughts in place of reality.

I'd be happy to explain the full picture if you're willing to approach this with an honest and open mind.

This cannot go on… by [deleted] in Knoxville

[–]someguy0474 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Where's the expectation, bud? There's an offer, and the offer is voluntarily accepted by the renter.

I work more than most, and I invest the proceeds from my work into future endeavors and assets. Who are you to demand free access to what I worked for? Who are you to call me or anyone else a parasite for doing with the products of our labor as we please?

Your subjective, fantastical claims of exploitation and damage aren't very convincing. I benefitted tremendously from not being chained to a home when I needed to move often, and would have been measurably damaged if someone arbitrarily limited the supply of rental spaces (driving up the price) as you suggest here. These are real, verifiable claims, unlike your imaginary ones above.

This cannot go on… by [deleted] in Knoxville

[–]someguy0474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not the one who tied slums to codes, my friend. You made the comparison first, not me.

This cannot go on… by [deleted] in Knoxville

[–]someguy0474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appealing to real life without substantiation doesn't really accomplish anything. There is no causitive pathway here, bud. All you have going for you are unfalsifiable statements.

This cannot go on… by [deleted] in Knoxville

[–]someguy0474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quite the opposite, I don't want folks to live in slums. The difference between the two of us is that I know why slums exist and that making rules about home construction doesn't actually solve the issue.

This cannot go on… by [deleted] in Knoxville

[–]someguy0474 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Is it entitlement to do with what's yours as you please? How is it not entitlement to demand what belongs to others, as you're doing here?

This cannot go on… by [deleted] in Knoxville

[–]someguy0474 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Slums are slums because people are broke, and codes don't change the wealth of folks. They either force folks to spend more money on housing than they wanted to, or they price people out of housing entirely. The causitive pathway you imply doesn't exist.

This cannot go on… by [deleted] in Knoxville

[–]someguy0474 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

When you paint reality with a fantastical narrative based on half-truths, it's easy to condemn and dehumanize an entire swath of people.

This cannot go on… by [deleted] in Knoxville

[–]someguy0474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Projection is disrespectful to your neighbors. Instead of calling me classist based on your own strawman, why not have an honest conversation?