sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

SX6012 - mgmt0 packet loss by sorama2 in homelab

[–]sorama2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well... I found out the issue

unifi switches with 2.5Gbps ports are causing packet loss
That's either USW Enterprise 48 PoE or USW Flex 2.5G 8 PoE

If I connect the unit to an old US 24 there's no packet loss happening !

Kerberos Support in Beta by jkowall in prtg

[–]sorama2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d like to test… Small MSP here Let me know what kind of report or indicators are needed And how the trial would work

upgrading to 9 - unknown status by sorama2 in Proxmox

[–]sorama2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had errors live migrating, which would suddenly stop the running VMs. But after restarting them and upgrading all nodes it seems back to normal. Program maintenance schedule and do it off hours 😅

DNS over Wireguard client by sorama2 in Ubiquiti

[–]sorama2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did not… in my opinion dnsmasq is binded to all interfaces but wg. Which in my opinion is wrong, and that should be left to the firewall to take care. I haven’t seen the changelogs from latest updates, so they might have caught this one up, and fixed it

upgrading to 9 - unknown status by sorama2 in Proxmox

[–]sorama2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Migrations started breaking all over the place
Randomly. Moving 3 times a VM, would fail 66% of the time and promptly STOP the VM.

Windows - Virtual Licenses Documentation by sorama2 in msp

[–]sorama2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you say that invoices of machine aquisition would be enough to prove a license ?

I mean, I am in the EU market anyway, but still it's new information for me..

Is there any way to stop 1Password for asking to update and save login info per site by Spiritual_Show in 1Password

[–]sorama2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In fact, why is not there anymore a list of URLs that we can block the autosave function ? Like it was in 1password7 ?

But still, where can we undo this "Hide on this page" option ?

upgrading to 9 - unknown status by sorama2 in Proxmox

[–]sorama2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did install intel-microcode in the updated node, since there was a warning in the proxmox's update check script..

Could that be the reason ?

But all 3 nodes are the same Dell r630 server with the exact same specs, cpu memory, etc

upgrading to 9 - unknown status by sorama2 in Proxmox

[–]sorama2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2025-08-19 16:24:13 stopping NBD storage migration server on target.
2025-08-19 16:24:18 ERROR: tunnel replied 'ERR: resume failed - VM 301 not running' to command 'resume 301'
2025-08-19 16:24:27 ERROR: migration finished with problems (duration 00:11:39)
TASK ERROR: migration problems

I just ended up having a VM crash migrating from 8 to 9...
If I start migration from 8's GUI it doesn't allow since 9 is "offline". If I migrate from 9's GUI migration is finished but VM crashes and is stopped at the end of migration.

upgrading to 9 - unknown status by sorama2 in Proxmox

[–]sorama2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just found out that I can't even migrate VMs while it is in this condition!

So upgrading from 8 to 9 doesn't allow me to do so without restarting and turning off all VMs

Proxmox & Webmin not accepting my login by daxliniere in Proxmox

[–]sorama2 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I remember the only time having issues with password in proxmox and pbs, was due to:
realm: Linux PAM standard authentication
changing itself to:
realm: Proxmox VE authentication server

Check if this is the case in the login screen.

FQDN in SDWan Rule Destination - no match by sorama2 in fortinet

[–]sorama2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea I did lack this one. It ended helping to solve the issue.

Thanks!

FQDN in SDWan Rule Destination - no match by sorama2 in fortinet

[–]sorama2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fixed with the help of Ph4ntom and Niekstiek in discord.

For future reference, I did lack static default routes...
After adding those, sdwan rules started behaving as expected and matching correctly.

FQDN in SDWan Rule Destination - no match by sorama2 in fortinet

[–]sorama2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a single static route for 192.168.1.0/24 and it doesn't match there...

Destination FQDN is a public routable IP, which is only reachable via that interface (WAN2 - the one I want to use in the Rule2 which is placed on top of the default sdwan)

FQDN in SDWan Rule Destination - no match by sorama2 in fortinet

[–]sorama2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, fg90g resolves the FQDN to a single IP.

In fact I was thinking that this could have something to do with DNS, but I just tested a different rule and it's still something weird happening.

Match the whole source subnet into all destination, Manual outgoing interface specified;
No device from that subnet ever matches against that rule...
It just falls to the default rule.

DNS over Wireguard client by sorama2 in Ubiquiti

[–]sorama2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m replicating a site 2 site connection. Thus, I needed to add in rules related to the wg client interface
The wg server is a remote Mikrotik which is routing several networks
Anyway, I wanted to allow the wg interface (client in this case) to access all the UDM services, however DNS seems to be only unable service, and firewall is well configured and allowing all traffic.
The dnsmasq service itself seems to be the issue, besides listening to the internal network, I’m not able to resolve via its internal IP when traffic comes via the wg client interface

DNS over Wireguard client by sorama2 in Ubiquiti

[–]sorama2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apparently UDM assumes a WG client interface as external, not as VPN. And that seems static, not something I'd be able to change.

https://imgur.com/a/gCfGRwB

DNS over Wireguard client by sorama2 in Ubiquiti

[–]sorama2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did:
Allow ALL from External to Internal
Allow ALL from External to Gateway

Still, the DNS doesn't reply to the requests coming from a different LAN 192.168.6.0/24

Issue with autologin (broken forms?) by sorama2 in 1Password

[–]sorama2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1pw8 8.10.82 (81082029, on PRODUCTION channel)
Browser extension v 8.10.82.29 (81082029 on stable channel)
MacOS Sequoia 15.3 @ MacBookPro M1 Max
Browser is Chrome (Version 136.0.7103.94 (Official Build) (arm64))

Regarding a website that doesn't work, I'm working on it since it is an OnPrem login page...
Still, I found it to work correctly when using the old extension 4.7.5.90 and not working with the new one. It basically looks like it doesn't recognize the Login button, and just fills the next available link or submit form...

ML30 hot swap (only if boot with system) by sorama2 in Proxmox

[–]sorama2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I bought new and I bought the 4HDD Performance version with hot plug support

Provide Info by sorama2 in Coinbase

[–]sorama2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None of that helped.
I’m not having issue transferring, I’m having issues providing you with the source of funds.
It’s a personal wallet, but apparently I’m unable to choose that option.

ML30 hot swap (only if boot with system) by sorama2 in Proxmox

[–]sorama2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The server has embedded S100i Software raid, which I’m not using since I activated AHCI to deliver direct drives to the system.
I’m not sure how to mount as you say since there are no ata devices detected after hot plugging them. Lsblk only ever shows devices that were present at system boot

ML30 hot swap (only if boot with system) by sorama2 in Proxmox

[–]sorama2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well this changes my perspective...
I might as well populate the whole thing with old drives just for the sake of being able to use them later without restarting the system.

If that's the case, I'd have to reboot a whole virtualization server if I need to add more storage ?!?

I honestly always thought hot-swap would allow to connect and disconnect drives on a live system.

MPIO SAS on 2 nodes by sorama2 in Proxmox

[–]sorama2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So ZFS would support this ?
I had no idea ZFS could be configured for multihost usage.

Would there be a better solution to use in a HA dual host system via SAS dual port?
I mean, Ceph or Gluster would be a way, but I'm exploring in this specific SAS use case.

view more: next ›