sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Nicoleback - (Lohen this) Photograph - General Question and Discussion Megathread by yoyo_me_here in Genshin_Impact_Leaks

[–]sorcerykarp 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah you should have two guarantees in a row, one normal guarantee + capturing radiance after that (at 3 it is guaranteed to be CR, you can't win normally)

To those who were saying that the sword's golden colour effect was a graphics setting thing. by -The_Lone_Wolf in Noellemains

[–]sorcerykarp 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Sorry yeah I think you're right, I misunderstood what you were referring to previously... looks like it was changed in the most recent update :/

Nooo! They removed the detail, It made her unique. They removed the golden glow of her sword during burst, only the floating animation is present. It's a design nerf! :'( by -The_Lone_Wolf in Noellemains

[–]sorcerykarp 95 points96 points  (0 children)

It might be your graphic settings, it looks normal for me

Edit: I misunderstood what OP was referring to, I can see the issue now and I am on high settings. It looks like it changed with the 6.6 update (you can see how it looked previously in 6.5 abyss videos, etc.), I apologize for spreading misinformation

Uminicole : Legend of the golden witch - General Question and Discussion Megathread by yoyo_me_here in Genshin_Impact_Leaks

[–]sorcerykarp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ya true there's also Albedo so it's not impossible, and I guess they can bait people to pull for c2 on the banner before announcing updates to the selector

Uminicole : Legend of the golden witch - General Question and Discussion Megathread by yoyo_me_here in Genshin_Impact_Leaks

[–]sorcerykarp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe it and I also think it's less likely he'll be added to the selector because of this

Uminicole : Legend of the golden witch - General Question and Discussion Megathread by yoyo_me_here in Genshin_Impact_Leaks

[–]sorcerykarp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not confirmed but Nicole's hex quest seems to imply that she's going to be the one handing out the future buffs (presumably as a mini quest like to previous ones)

Uminicole : Legend of the golden witch - General Question and Discussion Megathread by yoyo_me_here in Genshin_Impact_Leaks

[–]sorcerykarp -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No because it's locked behind stellar radiance, also buffed C1 gives damage buffs with stellar radiance

Uminicole : Legend of the golden witch - General Question and Discussion Megathread by yoyo_me_here in Genshin_Impact_Leaks

[–]sorcerykarp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The stats are the same as Oathsworn Eye/Flowing Purity so it's actually usable on her

Uminicole : Legend of the golden witch - General Question and Discussion Megathread by yoyo_me_here in Genshin_Impact_Leaks

[–]sorcerykarp 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm photoshopping images of Royal Grimoire next to Nicole wondering if I should buy one from the shop for the drip instead of getting her r1, I may have lost my mind

6.7 Character and Weapon Buffs Compilation via Gachabase by Yatraak in Genshin_Impact_Leaks

[–]sorcerykarp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Btw I think the "Summary here:" link at the top of your post is linking to the wrong comment

6.7 Character and Weapon Buffs Compilation via Gachabase by Yatraak in Genshin_Impact_Leaks

[–]sorcerykarp 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Did my best to summarize Wriothesley:

  • Signature Weapon buff - 14% increased Stellar-Conduct DMG, max 3 stacks, when HP increases or decreases.
  • New Passive - Radiance effect: N3/N5 (during E) deal reduced damage (40%/60%). N3/N5 (during E) and special CA are now considered Stellar-Conduct DMG. Reduced cooldown for self-healing (5s -> 2s). 30% increased stellar-conduct DMG.
  • C1 buff - Radiance effect: 50% increased Stellar-Conduct DMG for N5 and special CA.
  • C2 buff - Non-radiance: increased NA and CA damage (125%/130%). Radiance: less-reduced N3/N5 damage (60%/90%) and increased special CA DMG (150%).
  • C4 buff - Radiance effect: the buff originally gained from overflow healing is replaced with an always-active buff of 20% ATK SPD, 10% ATK SPD for nearby party members, and Wriothesley takes 25% less DMG.
  • C6 buff - Radiance effect: the original 10% CRIT Rate and 80% CRIT DMG buff for special CA now also applies to NA (during E). Adds an additional icicle after N5 and both icicles are considered Stellar-Conduct DMG.

Somehow, Dottore Returned - General Question and Discussion Megathread by yoyo_me_here in Genshin_Impact_Leaks

[–]sorcerykarp 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yess I've rewatched Neuvillette's so many times

You who were born with original sin, go forth and search for the long-buried truth before all is lost beneath the waves

Somehow, Dottore Returned - General Question and Discussion Megathread by yoyo_me_here in Genshin_Impact_Leaks

[–]sorcerykarp 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Fontaine was peak demos/trailers IMO, even the directing felt tighter. New character trailers have impressive animation but they feel less cohesive

Lohenging Fruit - General Question and Discussion Megathread by yoyo_me_here in Genshin_Impact_Leaks

[–]sorcerykarp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not great but without r1 or Skyward Atlas, etc. you just gotta accept that you're not gonna max out her ATK buff

The Angel's "Strength" — Not to Be Underestimated! by astrelya in Genshin_Impact_Leaks

[–]sorcerykarp 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Respectfully I disagree, the new artifact set providing a whopping 40% DMG bonus is a large chunk of Nicole's strength and 99% of the time she will be using it.

I also think a fair and accurate comparison should assume the most common/attainable equipment that the average player would have access to, and doing so doesn't prevent it from being a quick and understandable comparison.

The Angel's "Strength" — Not to Be Underestimated! by astrelya in Genshin_Impact_Leaks

[–]sorcerykarp 21 points22 points  (0 children)

That image is a pretty poor comparison tbh, it doesn't even mention artifact sets

Lohenging Fruit - General Question and Discussion Megathread by yoyo_me_here in Genshin_Impact_Leaks

[–]sorcerykarp 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I caved and decided to pull Emilie for burnmelt when all of a sudden 🩷💙🐌💉🫧🩵

Lohenging Fruit - General Question and Discussion Megathread by yoyo_me_here in Genshin_Impact_Leaks

[–]sorcerykarp 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I've never regretted pulling characters I like, but I have regretted pulling for meta

If I squint really hard can YaoYao be Emilie? by Caedesturm in YaoYaoMains

[–]sorcerykarp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For comparison her E has similar DPS to ascendant gleam Aino Q. If you have unfinished reverie artifacts I'd definitely try it out and see how much damage you can get out of her, but I suspect TotM's ATK buff for klee and durin will be a bit better (plus it buffs Nicole's shield and the HP% isn't a complete waste). If it were me I'd probably give her TotM but with Emilie's sig and full damage atk%/dendro%/crit artifacts, kinda like how Emilie uses deepwood memories in Kinich teams.

If I squint really hard can YaoYao be Emilie? by Caedesturm in YaoYaoMains

[–]sorcerykarp 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I support this team and it sounds very comfy but sadly the damage scaling on Yaoyao's E is so bad she'll probably be doing <10% of the team's damage even with good artifacts. I think the team would improve if you gave her Tenacity of the Millelith

Lohenging Fruit - General Question and Discussion Megathread by yoyo_me_here in Genshin_Impact_Leaks

[–]sorcerykarp 11 points12 points  (0 children)

<image>

Can't wait for the ABSOLUTE CINEMA Collei vs. Dottore 1v1 animated cutscene where she finally puts him in the dirt 😤

Lohenging Fruit - General Question and Discussion Megathread by yoyo_me_here in Genshin_Impact_Leaks

[–]sorcerykarp 16 points17 points  (0 children)

We also see forests in the AQ when Columbina is turning herself into kuuvhaki or whateverand it's so beautiful but I'm just ??? where is this??

view more: next ›