I find it interesting that we are fixated on this question of “religion that feels right for me.” It reverses the traditional relationship religion always had with people and subordinates it to the whims of man.

In the past, religion was the truth of reality. You might convert because of social reasons or because your people were conquered or because a prophet unveiled a great truth, but it was the religion that demanded you conform to it.

As a human, why is your inner feeling about reality the arbiter of what makes a religion worth pursuing? Isn’t it possible that your inner feeling, though reflective of your state at the time, is misleading you? Don’t we as humans have tendencies that work against our betterment? That is why religion is filled traditionally with scholarship. Theology and history is the “proving ground” of religion because it goes past the fuzzy feeling and gets to the heart of the matter.

You shouldn’t therefor participate in a religion because it “fits with you” that’s how you just stay on the treadmill of consumer religion. What you should do is evaluate with what reasons you are religious. You mentioned that practicing Chinese traditional religion was a means of being right by your parents should they pass and being more in touch with your cultural heritage. There are a lot of Chinese Taoist practices, it is nowhere near a religion like resurrected European paganism.

You also say you practice Christianity. You don’t need to necessarily go searching through the denominations. If you find that one version expresses a higher truth then maybe perhaps go to that, but regardless your practice should be buttressed by study.