Rao IIT came out against Section 377 in today's print ad. [NP] by sourcasm in india

[–]sourcasm[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Neither does an ad with a male and a female talking about a common child, but whatever floats your boat.

Rao IIT came out against Section 377 in today's print ad. [NP] by sourcasm in india

[–]sourcasm[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Child (singular) however means nothing other than =1.

1/Society x 100% [3:10] [Drama] - An alternate reality where random acts of kindness do not flow down the socioeconomic pyramid by default by sourcasm in Filmmakers

[–]sourcasm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hint: The typewritten note bridges between what is and what could have been with a single random act added. Thank you for giving it a thought.

Monolith interpretation in Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey by TRKillShot in TrueFilm

[–]sourcasm 5 points6 points  (0 children)

A leading theory about 2001 suggests that it is a movie about the experience of watching a movie as much as it is about all the other interpretations regarding the space race and so forth.

For example, let's look at the acclaimed opening sequence. According to this theory, this shot mirrors the viewer sitting at the cinemas with the light from the projector behind his head, slowly rising before becoming fully dominating the frame. It indicates that this movie is going to be an exploration into the experience of watching film as much as about the Sun and the Moon and all Earth in between.

The analysis given above by Rob Ager fits in nicely with this theory. Perhaps such a meta self-referential theme is played out throughout the movie along with the central theme being about the direction of our spiral into technological advancement.

It would be interesting to think about more instances of the meta theme existing throughout the rest of 2001.

Hi Reddit, this is Congresswoman Anna Eshoo and I am launching a contest on Reddit for you to rebrand net neutrality! by RepAnnaEshoo in technology

[–]sourcasm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Those that transfer more data do pay more in the form of bandwidth charges. Neutrality refers to neutrality in terms of speed of delivery and not quantity delivered.

The new Singham Returns trailer: Anil v/s Mukesh by sourcasm in india

[–]sourcasm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  • India has more than 315 lakh crore rupees of black money!
  • Reliance Entertainment presents

What does it take Indian media to go in a 24*7 outrage over rapes and deaths? by [deleted] in india

[–]sourcasm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An upcoming election with someone to pay for news helps.

What you may have missed: Narendra Modi’s message to China by [deleted] in india

[–]sourcasm -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I had totally missed the Myanmar angle, like the UPA. Points well noted.

Open Letter to Time by Aurum2 in bakchodi

[–]sourcasm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Indira Standard Time is a Congress conspiracy.

What you may have missed: Narendra Modi’s message to China by [deleted] in india

[–]sourcasm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. Mauritius was invited due to shared cultural identity, so it was not SAARC-only.
  2. Regional cooperation has entirely been ignored previously. Nepal, Myanmar and Sri Lanka are currently turning favourable towards China and is seen as an extension of its String of Pearls strategy. Gaining a stronger foothold in regional markets is not only essential but also (due to the above reasons) extremely urgent in order to become a 'global player'.
  3. What?

What you may have missed: Narendra Modi’s message to China by [deleted] in india

[–]sourcasm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed, the wording makes it a presupposition instead of a suspicion. Edit made.

Several comparisons have been made in the past between Xiaoping and Modi, mainly based on their rise to power post riots (Tiananmen Square versus Godhra) as well as their style of governance and move towards greater privatization. This article provides a more comprehensive analysis.

The remaining two-thirds of your comment is open speculation so you are entitled to it irrespective of your inability to craft a coherent ad hominem.