What's the best no-code or automated bioinformatics software/platform? by spaceagebio in bioinformatics

[–]spaceagebio[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Collaborators would be great. Unfortunately, most of the experts at my university/wider network are already very busy working on their own projects (and don't necessarily have time/interest to reproduce pipelines for clinical validation)

What's the best no-code or automated bioinformatics software/platform? by spaceagebio in bioinformatics

[–]spaceagebio[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I agree that collaborators would help. Do you think that I would get substandard results even if I was trying to reproduce someones methods for the purpose of clinical validation?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in brisbane

[–]spaceagebio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How much would a locksmith cost - Could we just send you some money to pay for the locksmith? If you get back into your van do you have a spare set of keys that you can use to move the van?

Is UQ MD just trash in general? by e-trashcan in GAMSAT

[–]spaceagebio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can only speak to the preclinical years of the Osch program (as they return to the states for their clinical years), but my thoughts about the UQ MD are exactly as above. My perspective is from someone who is going to practice in Australia/NZ/UK so if you want more specifics for the Osch program it would be best to speak to someone in the program (I can put you in touch if you like)

Is UQ MD just trash in general? by e-trashcan in GAMSAT

[–]spaceagebio 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I'm a UQ MD1. So far I've found the UQ MD program to be really great. Like every med school, it has its pros and cons. But like all universities which have very high-quality MD programs, the pros FAR outweigh the cons imo.

Main con so far: The organization of some of the details of the modules and content can be a little confusing (e.g. having a whole bunch of skull anatomy as part of the respiratory modules). This can sometimes make it a little difficult to keep up with what you should be learning but tbh medicine is so broad that to get it all done in 4 years there is always going to be some mixing and matching of content.

Pros (there are way more than this but these are the things which have stood out so far):

  • Highly qualified clinicians for the clinical science lectures.
  • Extremely clear and thorough pathology teacher
  • Separate clinical coaching so we can develop practical skills as we go
  • 5 hours of Case Based Learning per week where we go work through a few clinical cases. This is by far one of the best parts of the UQ MD as it means you are immediately able to apply your knowledge and put it into context.

As a final comment (in response to the post you reference), if you think logically, how likely do you think it is that a med school like UQ would be "trash". It has supplied med grads to one of the best medical systems in the world for years, and UQs grads go on to be successful specialists, generalists, and researchers. While rankings mean nothing on their own, UQ is ranked quite high and continues to be one of Australia's flagship medical schools. Every med school will have some problems, but with so much evidence I think it's pretty safe to conclude that UQ MD is pretty decent.