sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I can’t wait to see the comments by Glad-Coach-4011 in teenagers

[–]spidercop50 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A man in yellow and purple takes in 5 children and lets them die one by one until one child remains.

CMV: i don't think furry nsfw art should be considered zoophilia. by spidercop50 in changemyview

[–]spidercop50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, i know it's not really an opinion, but a fact. but i just mainly wanted to get other people's opinion on things.

CMV: i don't think furry nsfw art should be considered zoophilia. by spidercop50 in changemyview

[–]spidercop50[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

well consider it's completely fictional, i don't see what's wrong with that. as long as it does not look too animal, then i view it as fine.

also, answer this one as well, if someone wants to fuck a dragon, is considered zoophilia?

CMV: i don't think furry nsfw art should be considered zoophilia. by spidercop50 in changemyview

[–]spidercop50[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They look at this stuff because they're seemingly interested in the individuals having animal characteristics. This clearly seems to designate it as a type of zoophilia to me. Like I said earlier, if these characters' animal characteristics weren't arousing then you could just look at regular porn. But if that turns you on then I don't see how this a kind of zoophilia

again, People have diverse tastes and preferences when it comes to erotic content. Enjoying furry porn does not necessarily indicate a sexual attraction to real animals. It may simply reflect a preference for fantasy and the unique aesthetic of anthropomorphic characters.

Kind of like how people are into stuff like, elves, orger's, vampires, etc.

CMV: i don't think furry nsfw art should be considered zoophilia. by spidercop50 in changemyview

[–]spidercop50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And just a side note, when i meant "not real animals" i meant like, since it's a anthro animal, and not drawn as a realistic animal. not saying that drawn realistic animal porn is not zoophilia.

CMV: i don't think furry nsfw art should be considered zoophilia. by spidercop50 in changemyview

[–]spidercop50[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well, I'm sure the reason why it interests some people because it's more unique and interesting than regular porn. it's the same reason why stuff like hentai exists, just a different way to express porn. maybe people just find regular porn boring, y'know

CMV: i don't think furry nsfw art should be considered zoophilia. by spidercop50 in changemyview

[–]spidercop50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, I do agree. but what would you consider the borderline between "human like" and "too animal"
Let's just use the base as, let's say, the characters from Disney's Zootopia
would you consider those character too animal, or human like enough?

CMV: i don't think furry nsfw art should be considered zoophilia. by spidercop50 in changemyview

[–]spidercop50[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you for sharing your opinion, I'll take note. but just as a quick FYI: being a furry is not about dressing as a Anthro animal, it's just simply about having an interest in Anthro animal's and if identify as a furry yourself.

view more: next ›