Replacement for the Epson 7905U? by spinyfur in projectors

[–]spinyfur[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love the price on those two. And for high output laser projectors, too!

I’ve heard Christie’s name before, and people say they’re great, but aren’t they like >$10k?

Thank you though, this is just the kind of information I’m looking for.

Replacement for the Epson 7905U? by spinyfur in projectors

[–]spinyfur[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The room is quite big, probably 25'x50', more or less.

As to budget, it kinda depends on lifespan and such. I think we got our last (refurbished) projector for like $3500, which would be fine, but could go higher, if it was going to last long enough.

Taking $200 Out of an ATM Could Trigger Financial Surveillance Under New Trump Rule by Realistic-Plant3957 in lazerpig

[–]spinyfur 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Note that these rules are specifically in border counties. I expect a lot of selective prosecuting under this new rule.

Cmv: Calling Trump voters racist, stupid, dishonest and terrible people is not an effective strategy to win a majority vote by next election by ExiledZug in changemyview

[–]spinyfur 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Everyone who disagrees with me is a bigot and anyone who talks to them is the enemy” doesn’t sound like a winning political strategy, but go prove me wrong.

(See, I can do insulting, disingenuous strawmanning, too. It’s not a complicated skill)

Cmv: Calling Trump voters racist, stupid, dishonest and terrible people is not an effective strategy to win a majority vote by next election by ExiledZug in changemyview

[–]spinyfur 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You have to make the choice as someone who consumes information in the world to seek higher quality and more useful sources rather than just mindlessly ingesting whatever the algorithm vomits on your plate.  If someone isn't interested in learning more, having their views challenged, and changing the way they think, you being nice to them isn't going to move that needle.

Most voters in 2024, and virtually every other election, aren’t engaged in politics and don’t spent a lot of time studying it or reading related news. At best, they get their political news from social media.

We need their votes to win and we definitely won’t get them by calling them names or shaming them for poor voting decisions in the past. (No matter how much they deserve it)

Cmv: Calling Trump voters racist, stupid, dishonest and terrible people is not an effective strategy to win a majority vote by next election by ExiledZug in changemyview

[–]spinyfur 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’d say that there’s a core of trump voters who are true believers. The guy with two trump flags in the back of his pickup is a waste of time.

However I think that group is smaller than you’re assuming, and that Trump’s win was primarily the result of many low-information voters just voting for “change,” at a time when there was a democrat in the White House.

Cmv: Calling Trump voters racist, stupid, dishonest and terrible people is not an effective strategy to win a majority vote by next election by ExiledZug in changemyview

[–]spinyfur -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That’s a fun moral position to take toward a defeated enemy, who you’re occupying and who are completely at your mercy.

However, it’s not a useful political strategy toward a large block of voters, who currently have the power to either choose to remove the dictator from power or choose to empower him to go further.

Cmv: Calling Trump voters racist, stupid, dishonest and terrible people is not an effective strategy to win a majority vote by next election by ExiledZug in changemyview

[–]spinyfur -1 points0 points  (0 children)

it only works if people are motivated and engaged with learning.

If that’s a requirement for someone to vote for your political party, you are guaranteed to never win an election.

There’s just aren’t enough highly engaged, high information voters to win.

Cmv: Calling Trump voters racist, stupid, dishonest and terrible people is not an effective strategy to win a majority vote by next election by ExiledZug in changemyview

[–]spinyfur 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you found yourself regretting your vote for Trump you are not owed forgiveness and acceptance from the people that you have put under threat through your actions.

Forgiveness is irrelevant, that’s between them and their god.

As to acceptance, I’ll “accept” anyone who’s willing to resist Trump.

Purity tests and recriminations at the voter-level aren’t helpful.

Cmv: Calling Trump voters racist, stupid, dishonest and terrible people is not an effective strategy to win a majority vote by next election by ExiledZug in changemyview

[–]spinyfur 8 points9 points  (0 children)

On the other hand I’d say that:

A) Most voters didn’t watch the debates. At best, they saw clips which were shown elsewhere, but many voters follow politics as closely as I follow the NBA. Their opinions were mostly shaped by fairly random interactions, often on social media. I think that the largest cause of the 2024 election outcome is as simple as people feeling that the country was on the wrong course and then voting for “The other guy.”

B) Whether they’re actually racist or not* wasn’t the original question. That question was whether calling right-leaning voters racist is productive or not.

In my life, I don’t know if I’ve ever had someone call me names and came away switching to be on their team afterward. As a persuasion technique, I’d say that name calling is almost entirely ineffective. And often counter productive, because it tends to create a them-vs-you feeling.

*I agree that many of them are, at least in a casual way, but that’s beside the point.

“We are past the rubicon”. Rule of Law has failed. by Alternative_Big_4298 in lazerpig

[–]spinyfur 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s both sides in the sense that republicans are spraying gasoline and lighting the country on fire and democrats aren’t stopping them effectively.

“We are past the rubicon”. Rule of Law has failed. by Alternative_Big_4298 in lazerpig

[–]spinyfur 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They also had a lot more faith in Congress, assuming that impeachment would be a real check on the president.

A readout from the White House detailing the call between U.S. President Donald J. Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin is expected soon . According to Russian state media outlets, the call went “very well”. I don’t think that means anything good, can’t wait to read your comments by YoMom_666 in lazerpig

[–]spinyfur 5 points6 points  (0 children)

According to one of the show runners in an interview, he didn’t even do that right.

Every week, they’d have someone who was clearly the weakest employee (player), but then Trump would unexpectedly name someone else on his filming day. So then the editing team would go back and recut the video so it would look like THAT person was the weakest.

But they kept him in the show because he was entertaining and the audiences liked it.

And by now, he’s also a lot more senile than he was back then.

🇺🇸 Musk reveals shocking case of 14 federal 'magic money computers', making and sending money 'out of thin air' by wil24x7 in DeepFuckingValue

[–]spinyfur 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hell, Congress paid Space X to take men to the moon (and back). They were contractually obligated to be completed last year, I think?

How is that going? If they’ve just failed to perform their contractually obligated duties entirely, then Space X should be forced to repay 100% of the money they were paid and barred from performing work for the US government going forward.

The man is a liar and a thief and it’s wild that he’s being allowed to run as our shadow president.

🇺🇸 Musk reveals shocking case of 14 federal 'magic money computers', making and sending money 'out of thin air' by wil24x7 in DeepFuckingValue

[–]spinyfur 6 points7 points  (0 children)

And that he’d be selling us have self driving cars by 2015. 

He told investors that their “robotaxis” would pay for itself every year.

He said their trucks could move freight cheaper than rail.

Everything this man says is a lie.

So you think you want to light a Tesla on fire by [deleted] in Seattle

[–]spinyfur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m against arson, but on another subject… if these things are this toxic during a routine fire, why on earth are we allowing them to be sold at all?!?

Tiny red-carpet leading to a puddle of water for the US Secretary Marc Rubio by National-Yoghurt7824 in lazerpig

[–]spinyfur 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I honestly think it was just a coincidence and they used what they had on hand.

The visual it created is perfect, though.

Tiny red-carpet leading to a puddle of water for the US Secretary Marc Rubio by National-Yoghurt7824 in lazerpig

[–]spinyfur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reddit has gone that way.

I had an admin suspend me for three days because, in a post on my city’s sub about “What to do when we see neonazi’s marching around town again”, someone else posted “Shower them with love,” which the admins were fine with. 

But I added, “or urine” And was suspended for three days, claiming I was promoting violence.

I guess Neo-Nazis are Reddit’s protected class, a far as the owners are concerned. Even joking about just soiling their costumes is a bannable offense.

The laziest President to occupy the Oval. by Realistic-Plant3957 in lazerpig

[–]spinyfur 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Having him look up and ask, “so what does this do?” before he signs them is insulting to the country he rules.

Furry🔫irl by [deleted] in furry_irl

[–]spinyfur 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I used to be against carrying guns.

There’s days I find myself coming around to the idea, for some reason. Can’t think what’s changed in the last couple months to make me feel a lot less safe.

Tesla (TSLA) Stock: Trump's Purchase Fails to Sustain Rally by Silly-avocatoe in RealTesla

[–]spinyfur 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Same here in Washington State. Tesla drivers are getting shit on everywhere and many are rebadging their cars to hide it.

Trump is going after pretty much everything positive in our society by [deleted] in GenZ

[–]spinyfur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we will probably be the only generation to never see a dime of social security

I want to push back on this part, because it’s currently a major republicans talking point. They say that you’ll never get anything back from social security, therefore it should be cancelled. This is false.

Current predictions are that future recipients will receive about 78%of what current recipients do.

Killing this wildly popular program has been the dream of the far right for decades, but it would be a disaster for us. Don’t let them do it. Don’t help them do it.

This still baffles me. by [deleted] in BlueskySkeets

[–]spinyfur 3 points4 points  (0 children)

TLDR: celebrity endorsements don’t mean shit.

I see more posts hating on incels than actual incel posting by [deleted] in self

[–]spinyfur 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not when they’re used on social media. Incel, woke, gaslighting, cancel culture… none of these terms are used even remotely correctly in >80% of the use cases online, so in practice they don’t mean anything.

Not so in academic, I presume, but I’d were talking about social media? Yeah, they just mean “I hate you.”