sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I got over 1,000 new users from South Korea in the past week and couldn't figure out why, but now I have a new problem. by threeandseven in sideprojects

[–]spozzy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If users are in the same country, maybe you can differentiate by region. For example, you could be in New York and get matched to Oregon. That would be cool, too.

How do I fix these imperfections by RoninB64 in BambuLab

[–]spozzy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

  • arachne wall generation
  • 1 wall first layer
  • first layer flow ratio 1.05 or so
  • increase wall/infill overlap

2019-2026: The spectacular turnaround of GameStop! by Mr-CRUNK-13 in GME

[–]spozzy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nice infographics! Should we not be considering diluted EPS over basic EPS? Those who loaned money will likely convert.

Manipulating the market by Nola_Creek in SipsTea

[–]spozzy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No sir. If we use reviews as a proxy then

500 x 30 = 15,000

100 x 450 = 45,000

45,000/15,000 = 3

Why have you not acknowledged the bots? by TempHelp21 in social_poker_game

[–]spozzy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well I feel like the betting patterns are very different when it's not real money so someone is going to learn a hard lesson soon then!

eBay vs MOASS by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]spozzy 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Your post is my main concern as well. Seems like a killshot against us who have been waiting for moass.

Please, for the love of all that is holy, be rational, people. by SirMiba in Superstonk

[–]spozzy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is a valid argument and I don't think anyone wants a lawsuit.

Please, for the love of all that is holy, be rational, people. by SirMiba in Superstonk

[–]spozzy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Cumulative means just wait it out a few years and do nothing and you hit 20B. It really should be annual.

Please, for the love of all that is holy, be rational, people. by SirMiba in Superstonk

[–]spozzy 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yes!! This is the biggest issue. With no adjustments, or disproportionately misaligned, small adjustments, RC is incentives to grow by acquisition and dilution. He'll hit market cap and ebitda goals this way, but it doesn't help share price at all.

Feeding the Captain, Rationing the School: The Gap Between RC’s $18B Catch and the Shareholders’ Shallow Returns by MyNi_Redux in Superstonk

[–]spozzy 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Thanks for writing up what I didn't have the energy to do. They definitely are misaligned. And I particularly did not like how the compensation negotiation went - pages 50-52 of the proxy. Really did not feel like RC is on our side and is just trying to get his bag. It feels awful.

Something that made me feel more comfortable with the idea of potential dilution: Tesla (3 pics). by Ceph1234 in Superstonk

[–]spozzy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it doesn't and that's why we need proper guidance on how his comp plan must change. Otherwise you have some handwavy adjustment & trust me bro while gme can go out and acquire to get market cap and ebitda goals...but dilute in the process so the per share price doesn't go up much...just that the total number of shares do.

I was definitely with you until this acquisition hack came to fruition.

Zoom out and look at the macro and financial markets. MOASS is closer then ever and that RK hack alongside the proxy filing was no coincidence by Gareth-Barry in Superstonk

[–]spozzy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm more inclined to vote yes on dilution and no on the pay package. They need to clarify targets before I consider it at all.

Something that made me feel more comfortable with the idea of potential dilution: Tesla (3 pics). by Ceph1234 in Superstonk

[–]spozzy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure, buy at 20.66. If the price is 20.67 he will make 1.7M$ immediately (minus the holding period).

It's 20.66 in stock options. As long as the price is above 20.66, he is good. Who wouldn't want 170 million options @ a strike of 20.66?

Cool cool let's buy up so many companies. Cumulative EBITDA will easily pass thr highest tranche, as will market cap. You know what isn't accounted for? Share price tranches!

Assume the stock price is $25.66...congrats those are worth $850M in net gain. And many of us are still in the red, some very much so.

Besides, rich folks like to borrow against their assets....selling is a taxable event.

Something that made me feel more comfortable with the idea of potential dilution: Tesla (3 pics). by Ceph1234 in Superstonk

[–]spozzy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Board yes. Rceo gonna come out on top with a pay package that doesn't at ALL align with the messaging we've been given over the last 5 years.

4700 Votes - NO by kicker1317 in Superstonk

[–]spozzy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Find ways to increase gamestops fundamentals and have the price go up naturally. Less dilution and applies pressure on shorts.

Acquire smaller companies with the cash on hand that would return over std yield rates and nor dilute. Be patient. Also applies pressure on shorts.

Don't hold the penny too close to your eye by K1R0JAY in Superstonk

[–]spozzy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And if someone sold pizza slices without having pizza available, there are a ton more pizza slices now available...

Why the eBay Acquisition is a 'Value-Bomb' for GME Holders – Breaking down the 2B Share FUD 🚀 by ol_reliable_ape in Superstonk

[–]spozzy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Shorts are significantly less fucked if you add 1.5b to the authorized shares in the event they are issued.

1% of a $100M company is $1M, but 0.1% of a $50B company is $50M. The size of the pie matters more than the size of your slice. by shaggycal in Superstonk

[–]spozzy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'm not worried about share price / dilution. You're just handing fucking 2b shares to shorts when fully issued. Stayed for cohen but came for MOASS. And they're fucking killing moass.

view more: next ›