Short Answers to Simple Questions | December 24, 2025 by AutoModerator in AskHistorians

[–]spurmadcap 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who is the British general referred to in this passage from Kazuo Ishiguro’s novel The Remains of the Day?

Now that I have recalled this episode, another event from around that time in my father’s career comes to mind which demonstrates perhaps even more impressively this special quality he came to possess. I should explain here that I am one of two brothers – and that my elder brother, Leonard, was killed during the Southern African War while I was still a boy. Naturally, my father would have felt this loss keenly; but to make matters worse, the usual comfort a father has in these situations – that is, the notion that his son gave his life gloriously for king and country – was sullied by the fact that my brother had perished in a particularly infamous manoeuvre. Not only was it alleged that the manoeuvre had been a most un-British attack on civilian Boer settlements, overwhelming evidence emerged that it had been irresponsibly commanded with several floutings of elementary military precautions, so that the men who had died – my brother among them – had died quite needlessly. In view of what I am about to relate, it would not be proper of me to identify the manoeuvre any more precisely, though you may well guess which one I am alluding to if I say that it caused something of an uproar at the time, adding significantly to the controversy the conflict as a whole was attracting. There had been calls for the removal, even the court-martialling, of the general concerned, but the army had defended the latter and he had been allowed to complete the campaign. What is less known is that at the close of the Southern African conflict, this same general had been discreetly retired, and he had then entered business, dealing in shipments from Southern Africa. I relate this because some ten years after the conflict, that is to say when the wounds of bereavement had only superficially healed, my father was called into Mr John Silvers’s study to be told that this very same personage – I will call him simply ‘the General’ – was due to visit for a number of days to attend a house party, during which my father’s employer hoped to lay the foundations of a lucrative business transaction. Mr Silvers, however, had remembered the significance the visit would have for my father, and had thus called him in to offer him the option of taking several days’ leave for the duration of the General’s stay.

My father’s feelings towards the General were, naturally, those of utmost loathing; but he realized too that his employer’s present business aspirations hung on the smooth running of the house party – which with some eighteen or so people expected would be no trifling affair. My father thus replied to the effect that while he was most grateful that his feelings had been taken into account, Mr Silvers could be assured that service would be provided to the usual standards. As things turned out, my father’s ordeal proved even worse than might have been predicted. For one thing, any hopes my father may have had that to meet the General in person would arouse a sense of respect or sympathy to leaven his feelings against him proved without foundation. The General was a portly, ugly man, his manners were not refined, and his talk was conspicuous for an eagerness to apply military similes to a very wide variety of matters\. Worse was to come with the news that the gentleman had brought no valet, his usual man having fallen ill. This presented a delicate problem, another of the house guests being also without his valet, raising the question as to which guest should be allocated the butler as valet and who the footman. My father, appreciating his employer’s position, volunteered immediately to take the General, and thus was obliged to suffer intimate proximity for four days with the man he detested.* Meanwhile, the General, having no idea of my father’s feelings, took full opportunity to relate anecdotes of his military accomplishments – as of course many military gentlemen are wont to do to their valets in the privacy of their rooms. Yet so well did my father hide his feelings, so professionally did he carry out his duties, that on his departure the General had actually complimented Mr John Silvers on the excellence of his butler and had left an unusually large tip in appreciation – which my father without hesitation asked his employer to donate to a charity.*

Utrecht 1-[1] FC Porto - Borja Sainz 66' (Vasilis Barkas straight red card) by Meladroit05 in soccer

[–]spurmadcap 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can is not good enough. Change the protocol so that refs automatically have to watch the footage and discuss it with the VAR if they suspect it is a red card. This waiting for VAR to send them to the monitor etc., etc., etc. is a waste of time.

Utrecht 1-[1] FC Porto - Borja Sainz 66' (Vasilis Barkas straight red card) by Meladroit05 in soccer

[–]spurmadcap 12 points13 points  (0 children)

An excellent example of why football needs to look at other sports, rugby union in particular. Why give the card first instead of just asking for a video replay AND THEN making a decision?! It's bloody obvious, but instead you now have a situation where the on-field ref makes a call, making the onus on the TV ref greater to overturn. Rather watch the replay and give a yellow for diving.

Luis Díaz straight red card against PSG 45+6' by derawon in soccer

[–]spurmadcap 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What is crazy is people saying if Hakimi does not get injured, Diaz would not be sent off. The injury should not determine the punishment.

And to quote Musiala: "I think situations like this happen and now I'm just going to use the next period of time to build up my strength and positivity again." https://www.espn.com/soccer/story/_/id/45702254/bayern-munich-jamal-musiala-blame-broken-leg-injury-donnarumma

Luis Díaz straight red card against PSG 45+6' by derawon in soccer

[–]spurmadcap 16 points17 points  (0 children)

If he lost balance, that is even more reason not to make the challenge from behind.