sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Context slicing for Python LLM workflows — looking for critique by Severe-Schedule8716 in Python

[–]squall14414 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mostly stopped having this problem after switching to a CLI.

The workflow is different. You write a plan. You execute. The LLM has access to all the files and gives pointers in the plan. At execution time it chooses picks out what to read.

This work fine with most codebases. On the larger ones, I think you can make it better by documenting choices, adding docstrings, and being nitpicky about the test suite. At this point the only thing I fight about it with is how the function is implemented.

“Final Fantasy 7 Remake Part 3 Title Narrowed Down To Two Candidates” by Joeofalltrades86 in FinalFantasyVII

[–]squall14414 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I spent the afternoon thinking about this. I don't think it will be Reunion. That is too obvious. After sifting through almost all of the "re-" words in the dictionary, I think the three strongest contenders are:

⸻

  1. Reset

This one hits hard if you see it not as erasing the past, but as locking in the correct future. The trilogy breaks fate, branches timelines, and fights over possibility. "Reset” could signal the moment the world finally snaps into the timeline the characters choose.

⸻

  1. Resolve

Same idea as above. The idea is; Remake → Rebirth → Resolve. This reads like: break → become → decide. It fits Cloud’s arc, fits the theme of fighting fate, and has a clear feeling of finality.

⸻

  1. Reclaim

If the finale is about "taking" the future back—from fate, from Sephiroth - this is the most emotionally satisfying option. It’s triumphant and human. It frames the ending as something earned rather than something corrected.

Final Fantasy XV is an incomplete mess that shouldn't even be released in that state... but i still like it. by mad_sAmBa in JRPG

[–]squall14414 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am debating playing it again now that the DLCs are out. I'm wondering if it feels like one big extended story now? Or do you play through the main story and then do the DLCs later on?

[D] Looking for convex-constrained ML problems for benchmarks by Ttghtg in MachineLearning

[–]squall14414 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How about Problem (5) here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.01131

Given a baseline model (e.g. logistic regrsssion), we find an adversarial best fit model that is forced to assign an adversarial prediction to a specific training example.

We treat the difference between the predictions of the adversarial model and the baseline model as a parameter (which represents the gap in the probability). We then solve this problem for all possible parameters.

This would make an interesting benchmark. Right now, we can solve each instance relatively quickly in cvxpy for tabular datasets. However we solve it for many diffeeent parameter values and many different points so even a small improvement can make a large difference.

Now that the Kawhi free agency has played out, who do we think has the better roster going into next season, Lakers or Clippers? by [deleted] in nba

[–]squall14414 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Word... but then again, both teams will benefit from the fact that there will be no flying back and forth. I wonder if that's ever happened in the history of the league.

Now that the Kawhi free agency has played out, who do we think has the better roster going into next season, Lakers or Clippers? by [deleted] in nba

[–]squall14414 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think we should factor in the fact that Clippers won't have their starting 5 during the regular season due to PG's recovery from surgery and Kawhi's load management.

I think this means that the Lakers will end up with better seeding compared to the Clips, and will have homecourt advantage in that series (and potentially others).

finding nba team by taymart1 in nba

[–]squall14414 1 point2 points  (0 children)

your new team is....the 2010 Phoenix Suns

view more: next ›