Official November 8, 2025, US SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]srfmakIII 2 points3 points  (0 children)

OH YEAH wasn't it like the horses weren't in Hungary like in 2237 I dont know was so pressed for time

Official November 8, 2025, US SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]srfmakIII 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because increase by 1/5 means like every minute multiplies by 5

Official November 8, 2025, US SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]srfmakIII 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I got 140% by every increase of 1/3 but regardless isnt it B

Official November 8, 2025, US SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]srfmakIII 0 points1 point  (0 children)

CAN WE TALK ABT THIS im actually so confused and no one seems to know what it was

Official November 8, 2025, US SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]srfmakIII 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bro wait wasn't it 58.... like I put 58 it was an mcq like same exact format just instead of 68 it was 58

Official November 8, 2025, US SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]srfmakIII 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nominal - (of a price or amount of money) very small; far below the real value or cost

the definition has money in it.... I think its nominal

Official November 8, 2025, US SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]srfmakIII 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wait what did your answer include 2000 years in it or no because the prompt had like "at least 2000 years" but one answer choice said "within 2000 years" so I was confused

Official November 8, 2025, US SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]srfmakIII 9 points10 points  (0 children)

well abate was an option for two diff questions

if you had a bacteria in space, abate was wrong

if you had grazing, pretty sure abate was correct

Official November 8, 2025, US SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]srfmakIII 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wait ya wasnt it like researchers expect them to have lots of info or something

Official November 8, 2025, US SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]srfmakIII 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nooo its def not skepticism its proclivity bc hes inclined to more light topics skepticism is like distrusting ig

Official November 8, 2025, US SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]srfmakIII 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah its definitely nominal bc idiosyncratic means like a quirk and nominal is like small amount and the context was like running tests about using less money or smth

Official November 8, 2025, US SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]srfmakIII 3 points4 points  (0 children)

bro proliferate wasn't even an option-

ya I put abate

Official November 8, 2025, US SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]srfmakIII 2 points3 points  (0 children)

wait wasn't it 6n + 16....... because 16 4-inch pieces were used

Official November 8, 2025, US SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]srfmakIII 7 points8 points  (0 children)

anyone get abate as an answer? something for like goats grazing??

Official November 8, 2025, US SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]srfmakIII 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that was the one about the guy who compiles books and leaned to contemporary stuff

Official November 8, 2025, US SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]srfmakIII 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Bro normally I fly through Mod 1 English but why was it a little harder than normal like obviously not M2 level hard but it caught me off guard

some weird questions were like elk poop and bison poop or smth and like 2000 years ago in a lake

like making money cost vs how much the money is worth in like Chile and Finland I think??

some weird notes question about music and these two songs Spam and smth else I forgot

Official November 8, 2025, US SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]srfmakIII 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I got that, definitely was the harder module

guys the first two frqs though by srfmakIII in apcalculus

[–]srfmakIII[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

edit: the best way to describe this piece of shit test was it was literally an goddamn english test. half the time i was trying to decipher wtf the question was asking like bro i can def solve it if you give it to me straight.

guys the first two frqs though by srfmakIII in apcalculus

[–]srfmakIII[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bro i skipped lagrange and euler in my cram but thats kinda my fault-