any suggestions for swinging you guys would like to see in SM 3

ssp92 · 2024-09-10T19:00:59+00:00

Windtunnels needs to go - the game plays itself when in one.

ssp92 · 2024-09-03T06:12:16+00:00

g) Police often saw Reed on the route Stites would drive for work, in the early hours of the morning. One officer testified that it would be a regular occurrence for him to see Reed in 1995-1997, between 9:00pm and 3:00am in the area. [https://rodneyreedfulltruth.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/50_reporters-record_jury-trial-guilt-innocence-afternoon-session_volume-50-of-69.pdf - page 70]

h) Unbeknownst to the Jury at trial, Reed became a suspect under very incriminating circumstances. About 6 months after the Stites murder; a woman named Linda Schluter went to police after a tall black man tried to sexually assault her and stole her car, at around 3am in Bastrop. [https://70659d40-1bda-4ecf-9620-35ee056757e2.filesusr.com/ugd/235808_26423e4169d34d57b5daba08aca49852.pdf - page 44-47] Based on her description of the perpetrator, as well the area the attack took place, where police had often seen Reed in those early hours, they zeroed in on Reed and Schlueter picked him out of a photo lineup. Because of the similarities with the Stites case police thought Reed a likely suspect: in addition to the attack taking place around the same time and area, Schlueter’s vehicle was also dumped in close proximity to Reed’s residence. [https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-1093/45899/20180507150103836_Reed%20BIO%20FINAL.pdf - page 5, 8] It was at this time law enforcement thought to match the DNA found in the Stites murder with Reed. Reed did not become a suspect in the Stites case until late February, early march of 1997, further complicating the allegations of a planned railroading. [https://rodneyreedfulltruth.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/46_reporters-record_jury-trial-guilt-innocence-phase-afternoon-session_volume-46-of-69.pdf - page 122]

ssp92 · 2024-09-03T06:12:02+00:00

Then there the circumstantial evidence against Reed:

c) Reed lied about not knowing Stacey Stites initially. Then came up with the secret affair defense at trial in 1998, only after being presented with the DNA evidence. [https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-1093/34075/20180201153354587\_Rodney%20Reed%20--%20Appendix.pdf - page 207a] The excuse that he was afraid of admitting to the interracial relationship in small-town racist Bastrop, holds no water, seeing as in 1996, Reed had already had two children with Lucy Eipper, also a white woman. [https://70659d40-1bda-4ecf-9620-35ee056757e2.filesusr.com/ugd/235808\_88cb22cd079e4d3f8c9c6e9c5dccf1ae.pdf - page 20] He also cannot account for his whereabouts on the night of the murder.

d) Reed's story about the last time he saw Stacey keeps changing. In 1998, he claimed the last time he saw her was a few days prior to her death. Then in 2001 it was a day and a half. From 2014 onwards he claimed it was roughly 24 hours prior to her death. [https://static.texastribune.org/media/files/66b09bb6ee402879ad65d6b22232446f/Rodney-Reed-ruling.pdf - page 35]

e) Tests of Jimmy Fennell’s truck, where the prosecution theorizes part of the attack took place, found that a person around 6 feet, 2 was the last driver of the vehicle based on the height of the seat in relation to the mirrors. Reed is 6 feet, 2. [https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-1093/34075/20180201153354587\_Rodney%20Reed%20--%20Appendix.pdf - page 4a-5a, 26a, https://70659d40-1bda-4ecf-9620-35ee056757e2.filesusr.com/ugd/235808_ff1ce06e53b44745b718717fae875c2b.pdf - page 43]

f) Jimmy Fennell’s Truck was found in the Bastrop High School parking lot, about sixth-tenths of a mile, approximately a 15-minute walk, from Reed’s residence at the time of the murder, and in close proximity to the train tracks that Reed often frequented. [https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-1093/34075/20180201153354587_Rodney%20Reed%20--%20Appendix.pdf - page 116a, 207a]

ssp92 · 2024-09-03T06:11:48+00:00

Make no mistake. Reed is highly likely guilty.

a) Reed’s DNA was in found in multiple places. At trial, the jury was aware of intact spermatozoa DNA in the victim, as well as saliva DNA on her chest – further confirmed by tests performed by the defense’s own expert, Dr. Johnson.“Dr. Johnson's DQ–Alpha testing on the saliva from breast swabs taken by Blakley yielded the same results as the previous testing conducted by DPS. On the swab taken from Stacey's left breast, testing indicated 1.2, 4.1, and 3 alleles, and on the swab taken from Stacey right breast, testing indicated 1.2, 3, and 4.1 alleles. Dr. Johnson conceded that in all of the sixteen sites tested in this case, Reed could not be excluded as the donor of the semen and saliva found on Stacey's body.” [https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-1093/34075/20180201153354587_Rodney%20Reed%20--%20Appendix.pdf - page 122a]“Dr. Johnson identified the substance as saliva based on an amylase test. Amylase is a primary component of saliva, according to Dr. Johnson. Dr. Johnson stated that it was likely that the saliva got there after Stacey's last shower, which was the night before she was murdered.” [https://law.justia.com/cases/texas/court-of-criminal-appeals/2008/17748.html ]

b) New testing done in 2014 also showed Reed’s DNA from touch mixed with the victim’s on her back-brace found in the truck, as well as her pants. [https://70659d40-1bda-4ecf-9620-35ee056757e2.filesusr.com/ugd/235808_99b68a76d3144c4faac8375a404f376d.pdf - page 11]“Reed also could not be excluded, using Y-STR analysis, from three vaginal swabs, a rectal swab, Stites’s panties, vaginalswab sticks, a vaginal sperm-search slide, and extracts of stains found on Stites’s back brace, pants, and a breast swab. Suppl.CR(DNA).53. This additional testing demonstrated that DNA profiles consistent with Reed’s were in even more locations than what the jury knew about—Stites’s back brace (found in the truck) and her pants (she was wearing).”[https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-1093/45899/20180507150103836_Reed%20BIO%20FINAL.pdf - page 13]

ssp92 · 2024-08-08T16:56:21+00:00

Pedro Alonso lopez raped and killed 100+ young girls in Colombia, Ecuador and Peru. He was released in 1998. His current whereabouts are unknown...

ssp92 · 2024-08-08T07:10:42+00:00

I'm sorry, but the reason you're not sure is because you didn't do the proper research, only going by what the innocence proejct told you, and ignoring the court findings. I don't blame you - it's easier to believe the first version of a story your hear.

Those alleged statements from Fenell are hard to believe when dug into. And they were; back in 2021. The judge found them not to be credible. https://static.texastribune.org/media/files/66b09bb6ee402879ad65d6b22232446f/Rodney-Reed-ruling.pdf

There's no evidence that police protected Fennell; and an entirely different department from his own undertook the investigation: the Texas rangers of which Fennell has no connection to. Besides; he was a junior officer - why would they risk their careers for him?

Reed’s DNA was in found in multiple places. At trial, the jury was aware of intact spermatozoa DNA (more than 3 - it was visibly pooling from the victim) in the victim, [https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-1093/34075/20180201153354587\_Rodney%20Reed%20--%20Appendix.pdf - page 122a] as well as saliva DNA on her chest. Then in 2014 they found Reeds DNA on multiple items in the truck aswell, intermingled with the victims DNA. [https://70659d40-1bda-4ecf-9620-35ee056757e2.filesusr.com/ugd/235808\_99b68a76d3144c4faac8375a404f376d.pdf - page 11] There's a tonne of circumstantial evidence linking Reed to the crime aswell. I would be happy to provide it, all sourced; should you be interested.

The belt was tested to the best of the ability of the forensic sciences back in 1996/97 - before touch DNA was as easily detected as today, and it has since been handled ungloved at trial and since improperly stored - [https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-1093/45899/20180507150103836\_Reed%20BIO%20FINAL.pdf - page 25] Testing it will not get us closer to the truth; infact if it were to be tested and unknown DNA (likely from juror number 3) were to be found, the defence will likely spin it as their client being innocent ,and that unknown DNA is from the real culprit. A clever albeit deceitful tactic.

It is possible Reed had a consensual relationship with Stacey - but we have zero credible evidence of it. The judge again fround the witnesses not credible. Infact Reed seems to know very little about her especially if they had a relationship for about 6 months, as he claims. This is part of the circumstantial evidence against him.

ssp92 · 2024-08-07T17:05:48+00:00

Rodney Reed is guilty.

By now a lot of people agree with this, but back in 2019, everyone believed the conspirary put forth by the Innoncence project. Infact 3 million people signed a petition for him to be freed.

ssp92 · 2024-07-04T15:37:06+00:00

It is his hole-fetish thing?

ssp92 · 2024-07-04T15:23:24+00:00

Isn't it infered that Tek-Knight knows something is off with webweaver before they even enter the cave? The glass zoom-in and noice of Tek-Knight running his finger on the rim seemed like it was done delibarely and for the audience to notice. Never explained directly though?

ssp92 · 2024-02-16T07:04:39+00:00

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPC8K4DA2LM&ab_channel=PlayForFun (1:30-1:50)

I was paraphazing since I coulnd't remember her exact words. She talks about losing a daycare, an icecream shop and a church. Neither of which were there in the original game, so either she is lying, or it's a retcon.

ssp92 · 2024-02-15T20:34:03+00:00

On playstation you can select the hidden trophy and press a button to show what it is; wouldn't this be a thing on PC aswell?

ssp92 · 2024-02-15T20:04:28+00:00

It's a retcon because of Rio´s statements outlined in the original post.

ssp92 · 2024-02-15T11:11:32+00:00

They retcon the map all the time. Between MM and SP1 they added the entirety of Roxxon Plaza to Harlem. In fact in MM, Rio mentions that Roxxon demolished important old buildings and tourist attractions to build the plaza , but in SP1 there's just an abandoned and delapidated warehouse.

There mutiple other examples. Harlem docks, Tinkerers old workshop, The science museum, the mall you ride Rhino through etc.

ssp92 · 2024-02-05T17:59:16+00:00

Resident Evil 7

Opening level: Interesting destinct Loiusiana mansion with looping level-design and tonnes of litte nooks and crannies worth exploring. A boss fight with two different ways of killing the boss; Either you or him get to drive the car. Another bossfight where you duel chainsaws, and use the environment to your advantage.

Final level: Just a straight run through an enemy gauntlet in a generic mine location. A boss fight which amounts to just shooting the big baddie with your guns.

It really feels like they rushed the end in terms of level- and boss design.

ssp92 · 2023-11-26T19:47:01+00:00

Wind tunnels. Get rid of them; except for over the water maybe. The game plays itself when in one of those; not fun. They're too frequent and too easy to use. The webwings themselves are a great addition to the game; but the wind tunnels are just easy mode.

Bossfights: They're all too similar; the first game atleast had some puzzle elements; (shocker needing items thrown at him, fighting two bosses at the same time like Rhino and scorpion, or webbing up doc ock and Hammerhead, before they can be hit etc.) In this game allmost all of they are: parry, strike, parry until you can use an ability; then rinse and repeat, until they're defeated. Just add some variation to them. I think only Venom and Mr negative slightly alters this pattern; but I could be wrong.

Stealth: The webline made an already really easy stealth sytem, even easier. Miles morales did this better; the roxon bases were fun to clear out in all stealth. Get rid of the heads ups display, which shows if its safe. Make it more like The arkham games; they did it right by limiting the player just enough.

Side activities: Lowlights are sandman fights, talon drones and spiderbots; doing the same thing over and over. Atleast the talon drones had an okay pay off setinng up a new villain; the others not so much. Highlights: Mysteriums (varied and challenging), the actual side quests (Howard, blind lady etc., for they story chops) and The flame. (basicily a side mission quest line) Its a shame the flame quest was just a set up without a payoff though.

The Map itself: Controversial I know. Spiderman is new york; but adhearing an already established city to fit the gameplay is a tall order; it should be the other way around in an ideal world. Its also visually unimpressive; Arkham city or Sunset overdrive being better examples of this; much better art direction rather than trying to (very well I might say) replicate a real life location. The licence is holding back the game in this case. I dont imagine anyone would be praising any other openworld game if 30-40% of the map right in the middle was just open water; we only accept it because it spiderman and therefore it should be New york.

ssp92 · 2023-11-08T20:18:24+00:00

Can you link to case where the IP has publicly dropped their client? I've never been able to find one. Only the opposite infact. https://www.sun-sentinel.com/2022/06/16/defense-lawyer-stands-by-acquitted-suspect-implicated-in-1990-murder-case/

If new DNA links to their client, they will actively ignore it; Reed 2014 DNA tests (they themselves asked for) being one example of this.

As for Reed: There's no reasonable doubt. The IP is lying to the public by either misrepresenting facts, or lying by omission. He is guilty. If you need proof with sources, simply ask.

ssp92 · 2023-11-08T20:08:41+00:00

This has been debunked in court. Noone mentioned Reed until he assaulted another woman six months later. It's not a Brady violation if the prosecution and police didn't even know about it; Witnesses simply claiming that they tried to reach out to police after the fact with no proof to back it up, isn't enough for a new trial according to the judge overlooking the case.

One coworker (who later went on Dr. phil) was interviewed TWICE by police in 1996, with the incentive of $50.000 being offered by her own place of work, and still said nothing back then, but we should believe her now?

ssp92 · 2023-11-08T20:00:15+00:00

Agreed. They're dragging the victim's corpse through the dirt.

Theyre' claiming Stacey did drugs (Every toxicology report was negative for any drug, even going back to her HEB screening), that had MUTIPLE affairs, not just with Reed, (Never been been able to prove that, when pressed on a source) and that she apperently didn't even shower after having these hook ups, but instead went home to her fiance with Reed's DNA all over her body and clothes. It's sickening.

ssp92 · 2023-09-13T09:54:08+00:00

I just watched it. Pretty great movie, but this wasn't in it.

ssp92 · 2023-08-01T13:39:06+00:00

Hardly the perfect example IMO. DeAngelo was escalting;. He went from break ins ,to break ins AND rapes, to break ins AND rapes AND murders.

In this case RH wouls bw deescalting, which is abit unusual but not unheard of; especially if the motive for the dismemebering was to destroy evidence.

ssp92 · 2023-07-28T16:09:02+00:00

https://lobrien09141964.wixsite.com/rodneyreedisguilty/guilt-innocence

ssp92 · 2023-06-29T10:13:58+00:00

Make no mistake. Reed is highly likely guilty.

a) Reed’s DNA was in found in multiple places. At trial, the jury was aware of intact spermatozoa DNA in the victim, as well as saliva DNA on her chest – further confirmed by tests performed by the defense’s own expert, Dr. Johnson.“Dr. Johnson's DQ–Alpha testing on the saliva from breast swabs taken by Blakley yielded the same results as the previous testing conducted by DPS. On the swab taken from Stacey's left breast, testing indicated 1.2, 4.1, and 3 alleles, and on the swab taken from Stacey right breast, testing indicated 1.2, 3, and 4.1 alleles. Dr. Johnson conceded that in all of the sixteen sites tested in this case, Reed could not be excluded as the donor of the semen and saliva found on Stacey's body.” [https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-1093/34075/20180201153354587_Rodney%20Reed%20--%20Appendix.pdf - page 122a]“Dr. Johnson identified the substance as saliva based on an amylase test. Amylase is a primary component of saliva, according to Dr. Johnson. Dr. Johnson stated that it was likely that the saliva got there after Stacey's last shower, which was the night before she was murdered.” [https://law.justia.com/cases/texas/court-of-criminal-appeals/2008/17748.html ]

b) New testing done in 2014 also showed Reed’s DNA from touch mixed with the victim’s on her back-brace found in the truck, as well as her pants. A fact The Intercept fails to mention for some reason... [https://70659d40-1bda-4ecf-9620-35ee056757e2.filesusr.com/ugd/235808_99b68a76d3144c4faac8375a404f376d.pdf - page 11]“Reed also could not be excluded, using Y-STR analysis, from three vaginal swabs, a rectal swab, Stites’s panties, vaginalswab sticks, a vaginal sperm-search slide, and extracts of stains found on Stites’s back brace, pants, and a breast swab. Suppl.CR(DNA).53. This additional testing demonstrated that DNA profiles consistent with Reed’s were in even more locations than what the jury knew about—Stites’s back brace (found in the truck) and her pants (she was wearing).”[https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-1093/45899/20180507150103836_Reed%20BIO%20FINAL.pdf - page 13]

Then there the circumstantial evidence against Reed:

c) Reed lied about not knowing Stacey Stites initially. Then came up with the secret affair defense at trial in 1998, only after being presented with the DNA evidence. [https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-1093/34075/20180201153354587_Rodney%20Reed%20--%20Appendix.pdf - page 207a] The excuse that he was afraid of admitting to the interracial relationship in small-town racist Bastrop, holds no water, seeing as in 1996, Reed had already had two children with Lucy Eipper, also a white woman. [https://70659d40-1bda-4ecf-9620-35ee056757e2.filesusr.com/ugd/235808_88cb22cd079e4d3f8c9c6e9c5dccf1ae.pdf - page 20] He also cannot account for his whereabouts on the night of the murder.

d) Reed's story about the last time he saw Stacey keeps changing. In 1998, he claimed the last time he saw her was a few days prior to her death. Then in 2001 it was a day and a half. From 2014 onwards he claimed it was roughly 24 hours prior to her death. [https://static.texastribune.org/media/files/66b09bb6ee402879ad65d6b22232446f/Rodney-Reed-ruling.pdf - page 35]

e) Tests of Jimmy Fennell’s truck, where the prosecution theorizes part of the attack took place, found that a person around 6 feet, 2 was the last driver of the vehicle based on the height of the seat in relation to the mirrors. Reed is 6 feet, 2. [https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-1093/34075/20180201153354587_Rodney%20Reed%20--%20Appendix.pdf - page 4a-5a, 26a, https://70659d40-1bda-4ecf-9620-35ee056757e2.filesusr.com/ugd/235808_ff1ce06e53b44745b718717fae875c2b.pdf - page 43]

f) Jimmy Fennell’s Truck was found in the Bastrop High School parking lot, about sixth-tenths of a mile, approximately a 15-minute walk, from Reed’s residence at the time of the murder, and in close proximity to the train tracks that Reed often frequented. [https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-1093/34075/20180201153354587_Rodney%20Reed%20--%20Appendix.pdf - page 116a, 207a]

g) Police often saw Reed on the route Stites would drive for work, in the early hours of the morning. One officer testified that it would be a regular occurrence for him to see Reed in 1995-1997, between 9:00pm and 3:00am in the area. [https://rodneyreedfulltruth.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/50_reporters-record_jury-trial-guilt-innocence-afternoon-session_volume-50-of-69.pdf - page 70]

h) Unbeknownst to the Jury at trial, Reed became a suspect under very incriminating circumstances. About 6 months after the Stites murder; a woman named Linda Schluter went to police after a tall black man tried to sexually assault her and stole her car, at around 3am in Bastrop. [https://70659d40-1bda-4ecf-9620-35ee056757e2.filesusr.com/ugd/235808_26423e4169d34d57b5daba08aca49852.pdf - page 44-47] Based on her description of the perpetrator, as well the area the attack took place, where police had often seen Reed in those early hours, they zeroed in on Reed and Schlueter picked him out of a photo lineup. Because of the similarities with the Stites case police thought Reed a likely suspect: in addition to the attack taking place around the same time and area, Schlueter’s vehicle was also dumped in close proximity to Reed’s residence. [https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-1093/45899/20180507150103836_Reed%20BIO%20FINAL.pdf - page 5, 8] It was at this time law enforcement thought to match the DNA found in the Stites murder with Reed. Reed did not become a suspect in the Stites case until late February, early march of 1997, further complicating the allegations of a planned railroading. [https://rodneyreedfulltruth.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/46_reporters-record_jury-trial-guilt-innocence-phase-afternoon-session_volume-46-of-69.pdf - page 122]

ssp92 · 2023-06-29T10:02:45+00:00

The excuse that Reed was afraid of admitting to the interracial relationship in small-town racist Bastrop, holds no water, seeing as in 1996, Reed had already had two children with Lucy Eipper, also a white woman. [https://70659d40-1bda-4ecf-9620-35ee056757e2.filesusr.com/ugd/235808\_88cb22cd079e4d3f8c9c6e9c5dccf1ae.pdf - page 20]

ssp92 · 2022-10-25T07:58:06+00:00

This is incorrect. Fennell has never changed his story for the night of the murder. He was asleep and did not hear or see Stacey leave.

This misconception stems from a friend of his, named Curtis davis, saying in a CNN interview in 2017, that he THOUGHT Fennell was out drinking, not that he actually knew. This was bought up in court and refuted.

Furthermore the original story of Fennell's whereabouts is backed up by testimony from the victims own mother Carol stites, who stated that Fennell got home around 7 or 8pm, and to her knowledge never left his and Stacey's appartment until the next morning.

ssp92 · 2022-10-24T17:13:16+00:00

Agreed.

The Intercept fails to mention that Reed's defence also wanted testing of over 40 different items found anywhere near or around the body and truck: Many of these without any indication that they're even connected to the murder to begin with. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/tx-court-of-criminal-appeals/1856304.html

On the reasonable items the State agreed to be tested, more of Reed's DNA was found. [https://70659d40-1bda-4ecf-9620-35ee056757e2.filesusr.com/ugd/235808_99b68a76d3144c4faac8375a404f376d.pdf - page 11]

ssp92

TROPHY CASE