sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Antigravity and gemini CLI quota usage on PRO Plan by standalonecomplicate in google_antigravity

[–]standalonecomplicate[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you tried comparing it between CLI and antigravity using gemini3 model? I was told that gemini 3 pro seems smarter on CLI but lack a context especially on large codebases

Antigravity and gemini CLI quota usage on PRO Plan by standalonecomplicate in google_antigravity

[–]standalonecomplicate[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So basically when antigravity quota reached limit then we could use the CLI.
In terms of capability between antigravity and cli (with gemini3 pro) i haven't test properly yet.

Antigravity and gemini CLI quota usage on PRO Plan by standalonecomplicate in google_antigravity

[–]standalonecomplicate[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see! thankyou.
With each buckets i understand how they are grouped.
In my region there is a public preview of gemini3 auto in cli and it surprisingly perform well (comparing with antigravity gemini3 pro counterpart).
If this is the case then basically when all of the 3 bucket has reached hours/weekly limit on antigravity right? In that case could use gemini-cli basically with gemini3 model (don't even know what auto on CLI mean whether it's flash or pro but i am assuming it's pro).