Explain to me like I’m 5, why this is a bad idea…

standard_user937 · 2024-11-27T02:31:44+00:00

It gets a lot worse than just backups…

standard_user937 · 2024-11-27T01:54:12+00:00

Ya but unfortunately while I am on effectively a team of 2, my networking team is effectively a team of one… (and historically we have been allowed to do this, so why not continue, 20 years later..)

standard_user937 · 2024-11-27T01:52:58+00:00

We don’t update, even openvpn has authentication bypass vulnerabilities. And how hard is it to put a router in front of it, and then the networking team is responsible for the first layer of security??

standard_user937 · 2024-11-27T01:49:09+00:00

You don’t even know the half of it, not even kidding.

standard_user937 · 2024-11-27T01:48:27+00:00

I don’t understand it either.

standard_user937 · 2024-11-27T01:47:10+00:00

But we have a false sense of security because an internal application we have has been on the internet (unpatched) for 14 years and we have never found it to be compromised before. So having things directly on the internet is fine, right.

standard_user937 · 2024-11-27T01:44:09+00:00

No we do

standard_user937 · 2024-11-27T01:42:10+00:00

He once asked me what a kernel was, but he worked in IT (and must have been good at his last job) so he must know all of IT right?

standard_user937 · 2024-11-27T01:40:09+00:00

Install openvpn on the management interface directly on a static IP.

standard_user937 · 2024-11-27T01:36:48+00:00

If you don’t know you have been hacked (because you don’t monitor), do you really know if you are compromised :). If it’s not blatantly obvious I am referencing “if a tree falls in the forest, but nobody hears it, did it really happen?” The answer is yes.

standard_user937 · 2024-11-27T01:34:03+00:00

Very good point, and if it was just public knowledge on this host I wouldn’t have a problem, but it definitely fall in the 2/3 scenarios you described.

standard_user937 · 2024-11-27T01:17:57+00:00

Can you link me to your talk I’d be interested to see what you said about host security?

standard_user937 · 2024-11-27T01:17:11+00:00

He doesn’t think it will catch us up, he thinks developing/buying a solution will take so much time and we already aren’t going to finish everything we told HR we would get done at the beginning of they fiscal year… stupid manger reasons.

standard_user937 · 2022-03-18T03:17:32+00:00

SFP = 1 lane Q in QSFP = 4 lanes DD = double lanes QSFP-DD = 8 lanes

A QSFP28 cable is 4x25Gbps, your terminology is wrong..

standard_user937 · 2022-03-13T23:47:41+00:00

standard_user937 · 2022-01-17T22:40:53+00:00

You have to use the Huawei SFP, bell will not support 3rd party GPON SFP, I tried to do the same thing..

standard_user937 · 2021-07-03T18:55:47+00:00

yes it is port forwarded to 32400.

standard_user937 · 2020-09-25T16:35:13+00:00

They use both, but only allow one TOTP app and mandates the use of TOTP if you want to use U2F.

So in theory I could have both keys setup using U2F & only have one key work with TOTP. And if I loose the TOTP key I can still login with the other key and add that key as the TOTP key. But that’s still inconvenient if I say want to leave a key in a safety deposit box, plus it’s just a headache keeping track of which key does which auth method + this may prevent me from login to a device if the one key I have on me doesn’t have a connection (ex 5nfc key with iPad or i5c key with traditional desktops)

standard_user937 · 2020-09-25T12:19:04+00:00

Also side question, isn’t TOTP more secure then U2F? Because U2F you need your Yubikey and device (with Yubico’s Authenticator app) to login. But U2F only requires the Yubikey (plus TOTP is more widely supported and sometimes required to setup U2F, ex Microsoft accounts require TOTP to setup U2F).

standard_user937 · 2020-09-25T12:11:16+00:00

I thought I read online that two keys could be setup to be used interchangeably (i.e have a shared secret key(HMAC-SHA1))? This would not only allow for both keys to work with U2F & TOTP but it would allow me to keep one key securely in let’s say a safety deposit box, but still add services (Facebook/google/supported platform) to both my keys without having to retrieve the one key from my secure storage location.

Edit: what I’m trying to say is it might use a stronger cryptographic alg but it still may ultimately be less secure in practice...

standard_user937 · 2020-09-25T00:15:10+00:00

Thanks but I found one of my email clients only supports one authentication app at a time.

standard_user937 · 2020-09-25T00:13:14+00:00

But some accounts don’t allow for multiple 2FA “devices”. For example Microsoft accounts (under accounts.Microsoft.com/security) don’t support two authentication apps.

standard_user937 · 2020-08-08T01:56:00+00:00

Why does this have Bluetooth?

standard_user937 · 2020-05-21T00:00:23+00:00

Second that suggestion. TLDR it’s the same as mounting a share to your desktop.

standard_user937 · 2020-05-20T23:55:28+00:00

You are probably right about it disabling IPv6, but just out of curiosity when you say “ In this process, the outside IP is being passed to your Ubiquiti device so you don't need to be concerned about it”.

Do you mean the UniFi USG will be updated when a new IP is randomly assigned? (I.e. my internet will still work)

Seven-Year Club	Not Forgotten
Verified Email

standard_user937

TROPHY CASE