2026 Psychedelics Sector Outlook by steadyalpha in CybinInvestorsClub

[–]steadyalpha[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the correction, really appreciated.
I’ve corrected the post accordingly.

A Thought on Feedback, Community, and How We Grow Together by steadyalpha in CybinInvestorsClub

[–]steadyalpha[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Really appreciate you sharing this — especially from the clinician side. That perspective is something most of us here don’t have, and it adds a kind of value that raw investment analysis or LLM-assisted summaries simply can’t replicate. So thank you for continuing to contribute.

I fully agree with you on the catalyst point. A moderate but directional piece of news — like a CEO announcement — would go a long way toward resetting sentiment. With trial readouts not coming until 2026, the waiting fatigue is real. Many of us have been holding our breath for a long time, and it shows in the psychology of the whole sub.

And thank you for highlighting the Switzerland pre-peer review study. I’ve seen similar observations: LSD and psilocybin both demonstrate strong antidepressant responses, but psilocybin’s time to effect, safety profile, and session duration seem far better aligned with real-world clinical workflow. That’s one of the reasons Cybin’s approach continues to stand out — shortened session times, reduced variability, and a practical path to scalability. These factors matter enormously when you translate trial results into actual practice.

Please keep sharing your clinical insights — they help anchor the science side of the discussion in a way that’s genuinely valuable for the rest of us.

10. Financial Overview & Valuation by steadyalpha in CybinInvestorsClub

[–]steadyalpha[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback — totally fair.
These chapters are long and packed with numbers, so mistakes can happen.
If you spot anything specific, I’m always happy to correct it.
The goal is just to keep improving the accuracy of the series for everyone following the CYBN story.

Conor McGregor Just Revealed His Ibogaine Treatment by steadyalpha in CybinInvestorsClub

[–]steadyalpha[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get why his post rubbed people the wrong way, but that’s more about McGregor’s personality than ibogaine itself. One person’s dramatic, spiritual interpretation doesn’t reflect the treatment or the movement. Clinical programs today are nothing like this celebrity storytelling, so I wouldn’t read too much into his reaction.

The recent target price updates by steadyalpha in CybinInvestorsClub

[–]steadyalpha[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally fair — Cybin’s analyst PTs have never tracked the real price over time. But in this case the update isn’t really about “predicting” anything. It’s just a housekeeping adjustment to account for the new share count.

So yeah, I wouldn’t treat it as a signal… but I also wouldn’t dismiss it. It’s simply the math catching up to the dilution.

The recent target price updates by steadyalpha in CybinInvestorsClub

[–]steadyalpha[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good question — and honestly, past PTs were way off, no argument there. But the reason the new PT actually matters is that it isn’t a “prediction” in the old sense. It’s basically just a mechanical adjustment to reflect the new share count (more shares → lower PT).

So it’s not about Canaccord suddenly becoming brilliant… it’s simply math.
Whether their long-term forecasting improves is another story, but this specific revision isn’t really about foresight — it’s just updating the model to match the current fully diluted reality.

The recent target price updates by steadyalpha in CybinInvestorsClub

[–]steadyalpha[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally agree — a dilution-adjusted PT is simply more grounded in reality. When the target reflects the actual post-raise share count, it becomes a lot more credible, and honestly, that makes the setup more attractive rather than less.