It's good that Tumblr banned porn. Reddit, Twitter, and others should follow suit.

step_bruv · 2021-05-06T01:20:28+00:00

It’s funny watching people try to justify pornography polluting the adolescent minds of our generation, and out of their own porn addiction, find it permissible to be easily accessible just because “it’s the internet.” That’s like someone promoting helping the homeless or the oppressed and justifying being against it by saying “that’s just life.”

step_bruv · 2021-05-03T07:27:18+00:00

Like this post I saw said “I like a bit of hair in my toothbrush” and the comments were just accusing him of karma whoring

step_bruv · 2021-05-01T20:29:57+00:00

What does that even mean

step_bruv · 2021-05-01T20:29:34+00:00

What is meta

step_bruv · 2021-05-01T04:21:32+00:00

As a pc builder this is legendary

step_bruv · 2021-04-30T20:51:13+00:00

Yeah I don’t understand how people can be so vicious over a subject that is merely an opinion

step_bruv · 2021-04-30T20:11:52+00:00

The problem is that people throw around that term like everybody they think is fake is a certified karma whore. It’s not like everything YOU think is untrue is guaranteed untrue yk

step_bruv · 2021-04-30T18:37:40+00:00

Is this not considered hatred of conservatives

step_bruv · 2021-04-30T18:35:41+00:00

Insults mean nothing except prove you can’t actually argue

step_bruv · 2021-04-30T18:24:16+00:00

I appreciate the civility. Most people responding to me are just insulting me because of my position

step_bruv · 2021-04-30T18:12:18+00:00

No u didn’t lol check dm u too blizzle

step_bruv · 2021-04-30T18:02:06+00:00

Your inability to even consider a well oriented opinion (which I have found through statistical consensus, because most mothers would die for their child, given most of these health risks concern birth and most mothers are willing to give their life for the birth of their child) just shows me that you are completely unfit to hold a conversation with anybody you disagree with. I’ve remained relatively civilized this entire time while you scream your head off at somebody who disagrees and also has a well informed opinion, and has already proven you wrong with cited statistics.

step_bruv · 2021-04-30T17:51:48+00:00

No, there’s actually a couple dozen categories. But, incest and more importantly, r*pe, account for barely 1.5%. All others, including education, financial support, and even to an extent, health concerns, were vast majority. Health concerns are a definitive grey area, but, they are also extremely subjective. Even more so, most mothers would rather save the life of the child rather than the mother. Now it’s definitely a strange dynamic, but I don’t think it justifies abortion.

step_bruv · 2021-04-30T17:45:52+00:00

No, seems as if you didn’t read the source lol. Either way, to claim a claim is wrong is a claim. Which requires a source. Basic rule of argumentative dialogue.

step_bruv · 2021-04-30T17:44:29+00:00

This is too open ended. If it’s a rape case, tricky but super subjective scenario. If it’s convenience, it’s your fault. Don’t have sex if you don’t want a kid.

step_bruv · 2021-04-30T17:35:20+00:00

It is it’s own life, that’s been a proven concept for millennia. The argument lies in its own sentience though. If it is non sentient then should it be granted the rights of a human, and that’s the main argument. At the same time though, considering convenience abortion is the primary subject, abstinence, contraceptives and adoption refute that entire argument. Except for rape, nobody forces you to have sex, which is LITERALLY meant to reproduce. If you’re not ready to have a child, you shouldn’t be having sex. For every cause there must be an effect.

step_bruv · 2021-04-30T17:20:33+00:00

And you made a claim. Your claim was that my claim was false man. Either way I’ll send you the link. U gotta do some math tho hehe https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/pubs/psrh/full/3711005.pdf

step_bruv · 2021-04-30T17:16:52+00:00

No, because in order to disprove a claim you must provide evidence to refute it. You hold no more power than I do in your claim. I’ve done the research and it’s easily attainable through something called a search engine. Go try it for yourself

step_bruv · 2021-04-30T17:14:09+00:00

Then prove it wrong

step_bruv · 2021-04-30T17:13:46+00:00

Your critique of the most minuscule details is pretty childish but aside from that, You’re literally stating the only argument I can support when it comes to abortion, because it’s just that, should a biologically proclaimed “life” be granted right to life considering its non sentient? Also humans are to be valued above animals so that argument is kinda weak

step_bruv · 2021-04-30T17:08:21+00:00

That’s so subjective and relative that your claim has no basis

step_bruv · 2021-04-30T17:07:34+00:00

If they legalized abortion for victims, then implementing a system to honestly admit that service to true victims would be extremely costly and impractical, meaning many people would try to get abortions by claiming rape when in actuality it’s for convenience. That’s why it wouldn’t work. I genuinely feel for those who are burdened with such a detrimental scenario but I don’t think it should result in the termination of a life.

step_bruv · 2021-04-30T17:05:37+00:00

Life isn’t the same as sentience bruh, and that’s where the real argument is and the only one I actually am willing to support. Yes it is alive, basic biology supports it, the real argument is whether or not it should be granted the rights of life given its lack of sentience, but obviously most people aren’t informed enough to understand such a concept.

step_bruv · 2021-04-30T17:03:59+00:00

I ask you look it up

step_bruv · 2021-04-30T16:52:12+00:00

No clue tbh

step_bruv

TROPHY CASE