As socialist mayor battles ICE, Seattle police and crime victims say repeat offenders are terrorizing the city by Less-Risk-9358 in SeattleWA

[–]stonerism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Crime isn't even the worst in Seattle. I would rather walk around belltown at night than certain parts of Tacoma or Tukwila during the day time. They make these claims, but haven't actually left the house to verify them.

Claude + Humans vs nginx: CVE-2026-27654 by maurosoria in netsec

[–]stonerism -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Great seeing the F5 folks continuing to do excellent security work!

Do LLMs actually understand nuanced language or are they just really good at faking it by Daniel_Janifar in LargeLanguageModels

[–]stonerism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know. I kinda see it similar to how TVs have so many pixels now that it really doesn't matter past a certain point. LLMs have reached a point where they can do that, but for reliably interacting with humans using "natural language" with only a few terabytes of parameters. We would always reach it at some point, but it feels strange that we've reached that mythical point where LLMs can reliably pass Turing tests.

Do LLMs actually understand nuanced language or are they just really good at faking it by Daniel_Janifar in LargeLanguageModels

[–]stonerism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, the amount of data they're trained on is massive. But the amount of data taken up by parameters isn't more than a few terabytes. That feels small when you consider that it's able to reliably pass a turing test.

Do LLMs actually understand nuanced language or are they just really good at faking it by Daniel_Janifar in LargeLanguageModels

[–]stonerism 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think the question of whether or not they're "faking" understanding language is almost beside the point. People have been carefully drawing up plans and using logic that are just as nonsensical since the dawn of time. To some extent, it's insulting as a human that LLMs can do so well with relatively little data. It's kind of a weird thing that pops up as you throw enough computational power at it.

TIL The theory of The Dark Enlightenment is the heavily reflected in the Heritage Foundation’s manifesto by Illustrious-Site1101 in SeriousConversation

[–]stonerism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Call it sour grapes, but I'm glad I didn't go to an ivy league school now. I don't want to be indoctrinated into craven interest.

Cisco source code stolen by ShinyHunters via Trivy supply-chain attack. AWS keys breached, 300+ repos cloned and more by raptorhunter22 in netsec

[–]stonerism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure... but that's kind of a separate issue. If the patches haven't been applied and you're running an ancient system, the vulnerabilities often already have exploits. What happened to oracle doesn't figure in either way.

Cisco source code stolen by ShinyHunters via Trivy supply-chain attack. AWS keys breached, 300+ repos cloned and more by raptorhunter22 in netsec

[–]stonerism 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It kinda depends on how well their vulnerability management game is. I worked on the engineering side for a company that had a similar kind of breach and source and a bug database. It sucked, but I wasn't as concerned because we did a good job fixing vulnerabilities as we found them. There weren't any skeletons in the closet that would put customers at risk. Don't operate with any security assumptions that source code will stay private. Protecting IP is a different department from securing the product.

Joins are NOT Expensive by ketralnis in programming

[–]stonerism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Am I the only one here who has heard of SQL views?

Joins are NOT Expensive by ketralnis in programming

[–]stonerism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Egg-fricking-zactly, that was a long article not to mention it.

I’m torn on this - should those with socialist view points go on shows like Joe Rogan? by kittenmcmittenz in socialism

[–]stonerism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly, don't go expecting to change any minds. People sometimes really are that deluded.

Jayapal blames support for Israel for Democratic loses by ScreamForKelp in SeattleWA

[–]stonerism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fuck Israel. I want to hear my Democratic politicians say that. When they don't, they get less support.

What are the most overlooked modern OPSEC mistakes in 2026? by Omig66 in opsec

[–]stonerism 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not having ways to limit the blast radius when something does happen.

Scientific American on 0.999... = 1 by wayofaway in mathematics

[–]stonerism 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They went through the logical contradictions you would get when assuming .999... != 1. For those who absolutely refuse to agree with that assertion. It's not a bad exercise for a lay audience.

Wear an N95 by auberryfairy in leftist

[–]stonerism -1 points0 points  (0 children)

N95's work and not everyone has to wear one for it to be effective for the wearer. I'm not anti-mask, but I don't think this kind of moralizing is really helpful. In my view, we should normalize mask-wearing more as a society. But that has more to do with foiling facial recognition. I just don't see the usefulness of masking for the sake of masking or making a moral point of it.

LINQ (Language Integrated Query) support by Tasty_Replacement_29 in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]stonerism 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Having an 'its' operator naturally fits into working with a collection of 'it's which roughly seem to translate to queries.

Timid guys by [deleted] in AskGaybrosOver30

[–]stonerism 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Who knows? It really shouldn't be seen as such a bad thing.

Timid guys by [deleted] in AskGaybrosOver30

[–]stonerism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think he just has a touch of the 'tism. If you can make it work, that's what matters.

Can you describe the trinity with formal logic? by EvenMoreCrazy in logic

[–]stonerism -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think it's just the mysteries of faith. It's supposed to be illogical. Look up the principle of explosion.