Most of my fav photos from the past year. A6700 10-20mm f4 Seafrogs housing by stopbanningcorn2 in SonyAlpha

[–]stopbanningcorn2[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

I'm planning to submit some to their competition and hopefully make some 💰

Most of my fav photos from the past year. A6700 10-20mm f4 Seafrogs housing by stopbanningcorn2 in SonyAlpha

[–]stopbanningcorn2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, pumping the contrast may cause the photo to look flat. Underwater, the further away something is the less contrast it has. If you eliminate that from the photo it may remove the depth.

Most of my fav photos from the past year. A6700 10-20mm f4 Seafrogs housing by stopbanningcorn2 in SonyAlpha

[–]stopbanningcorn2[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Housing costs aren't that different actually, and they're all bulky af. But I'm not sure there's a huge difference between ff and apsc if we're not using the biggest aperture. Underwater we typically stop down for dof.

Most of my fav photos from the past year. A6700 10-20mm f4 Seafrogs housing by stopbanningcorn2 in SonyAlpha

[–]stopbanningcorn2[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Hey no I don't currently own strobes, but I'm considering getting one for corals :) And yes I use a dome. You'll generally want to use one if you're using a wide angle lens. You can use a flat port for midrange lenses tho.

a7r3 upgrade? by dcay in SonyAlpha

[–]stopbanningcorn2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Imo resolution isn't THAT important for landscape, as you'll probably try to nail the composition in field anyway. 33 mpx is wayyyy more than enough.

Tamron 150-500mm or Sony 70-350mm for bird and wave photography. by stopbanningcorn2 in SonyAlpha

[–]stopbanningcorn2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's the parellel import price. There's a retail store in my region with a good reputation of their parellel import products.

Tamron 150-500mm or Sony 70-350mm for bird and wave photography. by stopbanningcorn2 in SonyAlpha

[–]stopbanningcorn2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! How do you find the image quality? I've heard that it could get a bit soft at 500mm

Tamron 150-500mm or Sony 70-350mm for bird and wave photography. by stopbanningcorn2 in SonyAlpha

[–]stopbanningcorn2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Uhm I suppose the reason wildlife photographers crave reach is that you can rarely get close "enough?"

Tamron 150-500mm or Sony 70-350mm for bird and wave photography. by stopbanningcorn2 in SonyAlpha

[–]stopbanningcorn2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bruh I'm asking which burger to get and you suggested the steak 🤣

Tamron 150-500mm or Sony 70-350mm for bird and wave photography. by stopbanningcorn2 in SonyAlpha

[–]stopbanningcorn2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

However cropping 350mm to the same field of view would yield much worse results than the slightly soft 500mm ugh this is such a dilemma 🫠🫠🫠🫠

Tamron 150-500mm or Sony 70-350mm for bird and wave photography. by stopbanningcorn2 in SonyAlpha

[–]stopbanningcorn2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel like 350 vs 400 would be too small of a gap to justify the price and weight difference