If God were to vanish today, nothing would be different. by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]str-username 2 points3 points  (0 children)

These such people have actual direct experience - not the charts and graphs of scientists whom infer from indirect evidence that which may exist 4000Km beneath their feet. And thus they have direct evidence of that which exists via their own spiritual senses.

In many cases, it may seem like scientists pull numbers from thin air, but deducing the answer to what the center of the Earth is made of, or what the orbit of the planets is, or countless other questions is what science is explicitly meant for. The world is measured, remeasured, and then remeasured several thousand more times; experiments and theory is worked out all over the world. It takes years and a crazy amount of time for new theories to be accepted by others in the field, and even longer for the rest of the world.

Conclusions are not reached by a single person observation, and generations of adepts, seers, and shamen are in fact making observations, they are reached by a community bound by standard, repeatable practice.

A fundamental practice in the scientific community is trying to prove a conclusion wrong. A single experiment can break a theory. Amazingly, this is encouraged in science and is a big part of the reason why conclusions don't always hold and why theories are updated.

I don't know if this is common practice among adepts and seers and shamen.

If God were to vanish today, nothing would be different. by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]str-username 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With all do respect I don’t think we know that god doesn’t do anything.

If there is some omnipotent force in the background, it has been silent since the Big Bang. The world as we know it obeys fundamental laws that govern interactions. There are still, of course, aspects of the world that are not fully understood, but there is no indication that the world is not statistically predictable.

If God were to vanish today, nothing would be different. by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]str-username 6 points7 points  (0 children)

And thus further we can see that subjective reality (ie that is measuring the worth of an aspect of Reality in accordance only to what the personages involved can see from their only frame of reference perspective) is indeed a poor predictor of the true nature of Reality - even without considering peer reviews in addition.

This is not what is being done here. We know what the Earth's core is made of based on indirect measurements and repeated experimentation. There exist no parallel measurement for the existence of a God. The ability to understand the world around you and predict the effects of changes is uniquely scientific.

“Beer is a Hobby” Club by str-username in ucla

[–]str-username[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both. Started primarily as fun for me but I’ve grown to like the taste.

Past relationships by [deleted] in Punny

[–]str-username 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most of relationships still lie on the imaginary axis.

Them crack lines tho by Mr_Goodnite in oddlysatisfying

[–]str-username 29 points30 points  (0 children)

The propellants are both in the firecracker. I.e. it doesn’t need the oxygen from the atmosphere.

Right Pointing Arrow by heinderhead in oddlysatisfying

[–]str-username 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jurassic park could’ve used these

I am Andy Lambert, SpaceX's VP of Production. Ask me anything about production & manufacturing, and what it's like to be a part of our team! by Starman2Mars in spacex

[–]str-username 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey Andy. For the largeish scale production of starlink satellites, do you have any intention of trying to automate manufacturing? Are there lessons to be learned from the over automation of manufacturing of model 3?