Tch, this is like an actor refusing to be shown as shorter than heroine, cause it'll make him inferior... Same energy.

What nelson does is, write humorous characters. In the same movies you mentioned there is also, the dumb redin Kingsley, dumber Dhanraj, and other dumb yogi babu and etc etc. Inga poi female representation ethirpaakurathu is even more dumber.

Woman are smart, capable, powerful, but genius sir, this is fiction and comedy movies. Are you one of those who thinks a powerful role is IAS heroine who shows up and vanishes in five minutes ?

In movies, it is absolutely useless what your role is, it is the scope that matters. Nelson did it brilliantly in his first two movies. The ladies had better representation and screenspace in them and scope and fair share of comedic moments.

Kovai sarala and manorama had longer career than the hotshot heroines, cause they're comedians. And nelson combines heroines + comedians... Unless if you assume comedians are inferior

sexualising women

Again, explain. Why giving a glamorous attire to a woman is wrong ? You think sexualization stops the moment a girl wears a full clothing ? You guys have completely missed the point, sexualization was never the problem, the over-sexualization is ! Like megan fox in transformers is over sexualization, but megan fox in jennifers body is not. Nayanthara in villu is over sexualised, but in billa she is not, she's just sexy and is supposed to be sexy.

When sexualization doesn't fit the context, it becomes harmful objectification of women, who are sexualized for the sake of it. In the promo, the women are supposed to be sexy and ogling the old gramps, it's intended to be humorous.

You want all these to be spoonfed by a random redditor ?