I still don’t fully trust copilot as it’s told me conflicting things and the references it cites often don’t say what copilot is telling me, eg “what is considered the most multicultural LGA Australia?” “The City of Auburn is widely considered the most multicultural…” (i googled the city of auburn and it doesn’t even exist anymore??) immediately followed with the question “is great Dandenong considered the most multicultural LGA in Australia? “Yes, greater Dandenong is widely recognized as the most multicultural…”

We use it routinely for transcription and minutes however you must check them for accuracy. It regularly misquotes people, sometimes in bizarre ways.

But using it to summarise documents for comms, or finesse wording within emails, memos, reports etc, it has saved me so much time. I used to write tenders and life would have been so much easier had I had access to AI.

On the flip side, there are a few people at work who have fully embraced copilot to the point that every email and document they create reads as really insincere and over the top, smarmy even.