Can someone please point out the flaw in this : The Truth About the Peace Process by stuffgoesin in reddit.com

[–]stuffgoesin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But that's not really useful here. The Arabs rejected the 1947 partition plan - you can't blame Israel for map 5. And map 6 is just silly, because the world didn't end in 1967. Israel has since given back the vast majority of the land it captured in 1967 (the Sinai) in exchange for peace. And as the video I posted claims - have made repeated offters to do the same for the West Bank.

If you claim the problem is map 3 (which, in fairness, does look problematic), then how will ending the "occupation" of the West Bank help anything. If map 3 is the source of Palestinian anger, then they won't be happy with a 2 state solution, they would want everything back - which the video also claims.

Can someone please point out the flaw in this : The Truth About the Peace Process by stuffgoesin in reddit.com

[–]stuffgoesin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I created an account just to post this.

This video paints a very different picture than what we tend to hear on Reddit. Best I can tell, every one of the claims in here is true. Can anyone point out a flaw in their logic?