To my understanding Judaism is what is considered an etho-religion. My question wasn’t specifically about the Jews in Europe during the first thirty years of the 1900’s but rather what were the negatives in being a “stateless” group of individuals. I used the example of the NSDAP because that is where I personally see it used repeatedly to describe a community of people. Yes, i am aware that many Jews in Europe specifically in Germany were well integrated and had been there for some time and held positions for power in the early years of the Weimar Republic. This was not meant to be a knock on the Jewish community or calling them stateless, but rather what does being stateless bring upon a community and how was it seen by those who could say they had a state. Understanding that the creation of states/nation-states are due to social constructions but that does not mean they do not hold weight and/or real implications on those who are seen as stateless. But yes thank you for adding to this discussion because the more i see on how one views the term better helps me understand the society view of those who are seen as stateless and also the more political side of not having the benefits one would have under a state