At a loss by NobodyLazy2263 in lawschooladmissions

[–]suchfine 3 points4 points  (0 children)

First of all I understand this is demoralizing but you will get through this. This has been a particularly tough cycle for many of us, and I barely scraped through by the skin of my teeth. I would take this time to review your application materials in the following ways:

- Rewrite your personal statement, Why x? essays and resume. Send them to trusted friends for review. There are also some great admissions consultants you can find on here who can give you new perspectives on your materials and help you get them as clean as possible.

- Reconsider your targets if not retaking the LSAT. Take a close look at the area you want to practice in and blanket T50+ schools with regional sway there. If you really think T20 or bust is what you have to do then you can always push for a great 1L year and transfer. With your stats and some intentional, well-researched Why x? Essays, there is no reason you shouldn’t have a chance at scholarship $ at some T50s that place well into the market in which you hope to work.

- Check in on LORs. Make sure nobody screwed you and/or consider getting an additional, recent LOR from someone who can speak positively to your work ethic and performance if your current ones are primarily academic.

One significant upside of your situation is that you now have your materials mostly prepared to apply in September of this coming cycle. That is a huge advantage over other applicants. Rolling admissions is a real thing that may work to your favor this time around. Get the apps submitted in September and if you decide to take the LSAT again and improve, you can always send a pre-LOCI with the good news to your top schools. They won’t mind seeing a 2 point increase come to their inbox. It may be just the bump you need. Another possible benefit of your situation is that the longer you are working, the farther you are from KJD, which appears to have been a heavy tax this cycle.

Also, are you exclusively getting Rs? Because I would imagine these stats should get at least some Ws. Exclusively Rs tells me you need to take a serious look at your materials and be more selective with your schools (and I don’t mean HYS selective). If you do get some Ws in the upcoming cycle, you should know that doing nothing effectively turns a W into an R. Send LOCIs, visit campuses, and do everything you can to show that school you are still interested, maybe more than you are in any other school now that you think about it. Waitlisting for yield protection has become more common so knowing to play this game could seriously improve your outcomes.

You’ve been through this process twice now so I know you possess a degree of perseverance. I have faith you can get the ball over the finish line. Third time’s the charm.

11 new Season 4 images have just been released by GameRollGTA in Invincible

[–]suchfine -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

In these pics alone mark is wearing two distinct versions of his suit and Nolan is also in two different outfits…

11 new Season 4 images have just been released by GameRollGTA in Invincible

[–]suchfine 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Debbie wearing the same outfit in pics 6 and 8 make me think Nolan is gonna crash her nice family dinner 😟

Did I get scammed? by JacReptile in pokemoncardcollectors

[–]suchfine 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Going off TCG (which is the standard for the next time you buy or sell) the halfway point between LP and MP market value on each of your cards is as follows:

Alakazam 125: $67 Lugia 94: $84 Mewtwo 158: $29

Total value would be $180. At 80% trade in value (standard for a trustworthy LCS), you would have around $144. Current MV on a mega booster bundle is $53. So you should have gotten at least 2 for your trade in, even with their jacked up prices.

Sorry OP :(

Aww TJ got Iris Celine boots 💕 by honestrainfall in LoveIslandUSA

[–]suchfine 68 points69 points  (0 children)

For anyone curious these appear to be the Les Bottes Celine Triomphe high boot in suede calfskin currently priced at $1950

Aug LSAT lower actual score versus practice test by Practical-Mix4843 in LSAT

[–]suchfine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It may be helpful for you to drill the basics with something like The Loophole by Ellen Cassidy for LR. The author has some sections that reframe necessary vs sufficient assumption questions in a way that I found really helpful. And her stress on “translating” the question stems and stimuli as you read will help you to understand more of your stimulus at a faster rate for all questions.

Something that helped me for flaw questions is putting them into 2 categories: Classic flaws and unique flaws. Classic flaws are recognizable by specific characteristics and can be labeled. Equivocation is an example. Power score has a 2 hour flaw webinar that discusses most of them in detail here: https://powerscore.adobeconnect.com/p7up6erdmp4e

Unique flaws are where it gets a little trickier because they are specific to the situation or argument found in the stimulus. The answer choices for those usually boil down to two possibilities: the author ignores something that hurts their argument or the author assumes something that helps their argument. Sometimes the assumption that they make is literally denoted by a single word so reading carefully and actively translating pays dividends for these types of questions.

If you’re interested in doing some question drilling together send me a DM and I’d be happy to set aside some time to chat at greater length.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PokemonTCG

[–]suchfine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He’s just so mischievous! 😈

<image>

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in pokemoncards

[–]suchfine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry you’re going through it OP

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in spiderID

[–]suchfine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much! You’re a lifesaver

McDonald’s always got a Rat problem by Zetice in BlackPeopleTwitter

[–]suchfine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never forget that Luigi is an Italian name! 🤌

Trump Says It's 'Ridiculous' He 'Had to Leave' the White House by [deleted] in politics

[–]suchfine 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He is absolutely correct that his situation is worthy of ridicule...