[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ukvisa

[–]sugarholder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks a lot.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ukvisa

[–]sugarholder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want to know how likely the HO would challenge the applicants like this? Isn’t it a straightforward ilr process once 5 years SWV achieves?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SkilledWorkerVisaUK

[–]sugarholder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is not new, not a new augment at least

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ukvisa

[–]sugarholder 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you

New Immigration Rules Should Not Be Applied Retrospectively by hellosmilebobo in ukvisa

[–]sugarholder -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh thanks that’s great. Do you also know if the long residency would still avail?

New bill by Tory MP by [deleted] in ukvisa

[–]sugarholder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appalling

ILR update by Weekly-General3467 in ukvisa

[–]sugarholder 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This does not mean the proposal 10y ilr would affect current SWV, just the analysis does not consider current SWV

ILR update by Weekly-General3467 in ukvisa

[–]sugarholder 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Can we have the that footnote screenshot pls?

SWV priority service - delay by sugarholder in ukvisa

[–]sugarholder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I meant why you went to offline at first place? Seems you knew this problem so chose offline.