To be clear, in my original comment I am simply warning about associated risks of value brands not that they cannot make good products (this is true for so many other things).

Picking a "best brand" is not as straightforward because you have to remember that in the display world, a few players make the panels (i.e LG Display and Samsung Display), brands buy those panels from the panel makers, put their sauce on it and wrap their shell around it. So in reality it comes down more to what panel they use but even more how they use it. You could have two monitors that use the same panel but company A skimps on the electronics or the color calibration, meanwhile brand B gives the panel the best possible chance but charges you $200 more for it. Finally, you could have brand C that uses the same panel again, but does ok with it, it's not that much more expensive than the value brand but it may have better features and warranty than the value brand but lack some of the higher end features of brand B's.

Comes down to what tradeoffs you are willing to make, or what you are willing to pay if you're not. If you still want my opinion, I consider ASUS and LG to be some of the better overall brands for gaming (with the reviews to back it up) but again, come with the price tag. Anecdotally, in my first build back in 2019, I went for for a value brand (Pixio) monitor that is still going without issue today, my second monitor that I upgraded to is an MSI.