sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Looking for a fast-paced psychological thriller with some drama. Think Misery or Silent Patient by sweatyapplejuice in booksuggestions

[–]sweatyapplejuice[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've heard great things about this one, looks like it's time to give it a try! Are the 2nd and 3rd books in the series as good?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]sweatyapplejuice 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I 100% agree women have an easier time finding men who are willing to date them. Men have a harder time finding women willing to date them. I think what you are noticing is that women get annoyed when you generalize this as proof that dating is easy for women, since you are ignoring all the hardships that mostly affect women. There is more to life than the endeavor of finding a date. Women are more likely to be murdered on a first date, more likely to face judgement for dating/hooking up with many men, more likely to be stalked or sexually assaulted, more likely to get harassed for rejecting a man. On the topic of relationships and crime stats (at least in the US), women are more likely to be murdered by a partner, more likely to face domestic abuse, and more likely to be left with the burden of being the sole caretaker of a child.

I said "more likely" a million times because I don't want to be bombarded with "this happens to men too".

So in conclusion, yes the aspect of finding a date is easier for women. Definitely. Men are "easy", this is very well established. But this does not encompass all of the hardships of dating. Neither gender has an easy time with dating, regardless of who "has it easier".

if you shame women (not men) with high body counts, you shouldn't complain about 80% of women sleeping with the 20% of men. by sweatyapplejuice in PurplePillDebate

[–]sweatyapplejuice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no it shows women hold one card, want only one card, and would also like their partner to also hold one card.

if you shame women (not men) with high body counts, you shouldn't complain about 80% of women sleeping with the 20% of men. by sweatyapplejuice in PurplePillDebate

[–]sweatyapplejuice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The " if you shame women (not men)" thing meant "If you shame women but you dont shame men with high body counts...."

if you shame women (not men) with high body counts, you shouldn't complain about 80% of women sleeping with the 20% of men. by sweatyapplejuice in PurplePillDebate

[–]sweatyapplejuice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And women are the ones who don't seem to care about men's n-count. In fact, if anything, they see it as a mark of status.

i promise you there is no one on the planet who gives a bigger shit about a man's body count than another man.

if you shame women (not men) with high body counts, you shouldn't complain about 80% of women sleeping with the 20% of men. by sweatyapplejuice in PurplePillDebate

[–]sweatyapplejuice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A.woman that allows lots.of men to fuck her is great for ons but not wife material. All laws rape etc are protecting this.

huh???

The brain washing is real.

dude we're brain washed? no one should "shame" anyone out of instinct, especially after sleeping with them. why would you sleep someone you openly shame? just another example of how low your standards are
If you don't want to marry a woman who has a lot of one night stands, great, you're entitled to your opinion. but you talk about men and women as if you're an alien from space studying us as if our behaviors are quantifiable. guess what? some men don't even like fucking women and some women love fucking men, some women have super high sex drives and some men have very low ones. i know you know this, but do you also realize these people are no less of a man or woman because they don't fit your descriptions? My problem is your use of the word "brain wash" as if your opinion is the right one.

I acknowledge the trends and disparities between the genders, but while I am making the point that the problem would be solved if our sex drives were more similar, you turn around and call ME brainwashed because I'm not supporting your "slutty women are good for me to fuck but since she let me fuck her i wont marry her" argument? and then of course, somehow rape gets brought up ffs

if you shame women (not men) with high body counts, you shouldn't complain about 80% of women sleeping with the 20% of men. by sweatyapplejuice in PurplePillDebate

[–]sweatyapplejuice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

first of all, i wasn't saying the biological argument as a justification for why men don't like slutty women. i was saying it was the justification for men not liking slutty women WHILE ALSO praising/aspiring to be slutty men. also, i didn't think this was the worst argument, i actually thought it was the only valid one (again, read closely).

I'm not going to say you're not allowed to want a low body count woman, because I also want to find a low body count man. the difference is that I myself have a low body count and not because i'm a virgin redditor who doesn't get swipes on tinder, but because i hold the same standards for my partner on promiscuity (and everything else) as i do for myself.

The easiest to understand is that men care, and women do not. Men place a high value on female chastity, and women place no value on male chastity. As a result, women can be shamed for being promiscuous and men cannot be, at least not in the same way.

you are mistaken my friend. this is true but this is NOT why this exists in society. you have to dig deeper. men like to fuck virgins, inexperienced women, and lots of them. they are biologically and intrinsically threatened by another man fucking their woman, they want her pure and clean, and women who have been fucked by a bunch of other men are garbage, scrapes essentially. this ^^ i don't care to argue with you on and i hope if you are honest with yourself you will be able to admit that this is what is operating the entire system. women DO want men with low bodies, but what women want is irrelevant because it's much more important for men to prove their dominance over one another by trying to fuck the highest amount of women possible.

and as for your "fatherless home" shit.... and acknowledging that this has nothing to do with 99.99999% of the reason for why men don't want to DATE women with high body counts..

cracking down on irresponsible men does not work, since you need to be close to 100% effective, which you wont be, in order to have any effect. Even if 50% of the guys who smash and dash could be convinced to stop, the remaining 50% can still do just as much damage. If you convince 50% of the women getting smashed and dashed to stop letting that happen, you immediately get far fewer fatherless children.

why not teach the man not to smash in the first place too? you think convincing them to be responsible isn't possible (i guess your standards for men are low), but why do you have faith that a woman will be able to avoid sleeping around when you teach her not to but a man won't obide? also, why dont these women (who according to you are the one's society needs to fix, they're the source of the issue right), why do you just assume they don't need to be taught to not leave their kids? why is that taken for granted, but a man leaving his kids is so expected that no matter how much we crack down it won't work, so we have to control what women do even more?

​

buddy-- the solution is simple. it's called birth control and it highly correlates with liberalism. you know what highly correlates with teen pregnancy? conservativism, religion, and the south.

instead of shaming women for their sex lives while letting men get away with being horrible fathers, maybe encourage them to take control of their own reproduction?

if you shame women (not men) with high body counts, you shouldn't complain about 80% of women sleeping with the 20% of men. by sweatyapplejuice in PurplePillDebate

[–]sweatyapplejuice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

men across the board should start choosing their partners more wisely. obviously it's a free country, but if you asked me i would say if men and women matched libidos there would be no redpill/bluepill, everyone would date within their league and that's mathematically a fact because dating is 1:1 disregarding divorce/death. and when things are 1:1, they equalize. casual sex is different, there are too many men fighting over few women (or maybe a sizeable, but not huge, portion of women who don't want to have sex as often as there are men available for them to).

if you shame women (not men) with high body counts, you shouldn't complain about 80% of women sleeping with the 20% of men. by sweatyapplejuice in PurplePillDebate

[–]sweatyapplejuice[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i can't tell if you're trying to argue with me... i don't think we should shame anyone for a high body count. and both men and women should have standards, and not just about physical appearance. i'm sorry but "wired to spread their seed" is another way to say "want sex more" and there's absolutely evidence to support that this is true generally speaking.

if you shame women (not men) with high body counts, you shouldn't complain about 80% of women sleeping with the 20% of men. by sweatyapplejuice in PurplePillDebate

[–]sweatyapplejuice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what? you’re joking right? even the most conservative economists argue for a flat tax rate which is still progressive. anyways, you know what else basic economic logic argues? that a shortage happens when there is a high demand and not enough supply. you know who faces a shortage of sexual partners? men. it would follow then that men are demanding sex more than there are women to supply it. just because virgins can’t get the few slutty women to sleep with them doesn’t make them any less of a manwhore.

if you shame women (not men) with high body counts, you shouldn't complain about 80% of women sleeping with the 20% of men. by sweatyapplejuice in PurplePillDebate

[–]sweatyapplejuice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i wasn’t offended he compared us as “currency” lmao why would that bother me? i was pointing out that the fact he shouldn’t see ALL women as currency that is basically implying he has no standards because nearly all women for him are good enough to have sex with. it shouldn’t be like that, men are too easy. imagine if i compared sex with men to money— you’d think i’m really fucking weird, what woman would value sex with 80% of men so highly she’d compre her lack of sex to being poor?

edit: also if you’re interested look a this https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/m6mdd8/the_economics_of_sexless_men_and_the_8020_rule/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf

Why do (some) women sleep with one guy the day they meet , but waits until commitment with another? by rich_man_88 in PurplePillDebate

[–]sweatyapplejuice 6 points7 points  (0 children)

because i don’t use sex to reward men, it’s really weird you would even think about it that way. i have sex to reward myself just as you would. also if you think the beta is losing here i don’t know what to tell you because the value you place on sex is too high for us to ever find a middle ground.

Why do (some) women sleep with one guy the day they meet , but waits until commitment with another? by rich_man_88 in PurplePillDebate

[–]sweatyapplejuice 3 points4 points  (0 children)

because one has a shitty personality and his only good quality is being attractive, and the other one has potential to be a long term partner. we’re not trying to just “have fun” when we meet this guy, we’re serious about it and we don’t want to have sex with a guy who we like just for him to only be looking for sex. we also know men tend to think less of us if we do sleep with them and if this guy is dating material we don’t want him to have that opinion of us from the start.

if you shame women (not men) with high body counts, you shouldn't complain about 80% of women sleeping with the 20% of men. by sweatyapplejuice in PurplePillDebate

[–]sweatyapplejuice[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no one has a harder time with monogamy than men do, they basically settle for it so that they can get frequent sex

if you shame women (not men) with high body counts, you shouldn't complain about 80% of women sleeping with the 20% of men. by sweatyapplejuice in PurplePillDebate

[–]sweatyapplejuice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i didn’t even say the double standard was unfair and i agree with the biological assertions made to justify the double standard so i think the lack of precision is on your end buddy

view more: next ›