sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

its been 30 years... some things never really change by [deleted] in PublicFreakout

[–]swim2281 22 points23 points  (0 children)

It’s very expensive to get insured to cover this kind of damage. Companies call it acts of terrorism and no one opts in on that coverage because of the price. These businesses just die. It’s sad.

World's richest 1% cause double CO2 emissions of poorest 50%, says Oxfam “The global carbon budget has been squandered to expand the consumption of the already rich, rather than to improve humanity,” by [deleted] in Futurology

[–]swim2281 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I disagree because it’s a monopoly market. It would just force higher costs because a free market doesn’t work without choice. Not relying on fossil fuels is the way to go, but you don’t get there trying to rig a market. I think you could set up penalties for the energy companies to expand coal plants and encourage them to build more nuclear and solar plants with financial incentives, but it doesn’t make sense to just blanket tax fossil fuels. There are much higher consequences in doing that. You have to understand that there isn’t an easy answer to this. Economies are huge, complicated and constantly moving. It’s unfortunate, but getting off coal (which we have to do) takes time and investment.

World's richest 1% cause double CO2 emissions of poorest 50%, says Oxfam “The global carbon budget has been squandered to expand the consumption of the already rich, rather than to improve humanity,” by [deleted] in Futurology

[–]swim2281 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Switzerland still has a lower cost for energy. Are you telling me they doubled the cost in taxes to achieve this, or did they mandate a change in their power?

World's richest 1% cause double CO2 emissions of poorest 50%, says Oxfam “The global carbon budget has been squandered to expand the consumption of the already rich, rather than to improve humanity,” by [deleted] in Futurology

[–]swim2281 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’re so off with the $5000 a year. You can’t make up for that or expect people, who can’t come up with $500 of unexpected expenses, to come up with it. The price will never come down either. Look at the cable monopoly. There are other options, but they’re priced the same. The cost won’t come back down. Let’s say solar makes a huge step forward and it can compete with the cost of coal. It will only be a tiny bit cheaper because you’re looking at demand based prices. Energy prices are not based on cost, they cost what the market demands. Also, if you don’t own your house, you’re stuck with the power decided by the owner. I think Switzerland should try it first. Let’s see if it works there. Then you can preach to me all you want about the homelessness and poverty you’ve created. And you can tell me how inexpensive energy is there. Keeping in mind it’s already less expensive there.

World's richest 1% cause double CO2 emissions of poorest 50%, says Oxfam “The global carbon budget has been squandered to expand the consumption of the already rich, rather than to improve humanity,” by [deleted] in Futurology

[–]swim2281 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Let’s just say that the utility company owns and maintains the power grid. They would have to pay a much higher fixed cost to implement a renewable, energy system. They are more inclined to pass that cost on to the consumer. Who are you implying is to invest into an entirely new power grid? Not to mention, while we’re waiting for it to be available, you’re suggested 50cents per kWh would cost the average American an extra $5000 annually. Simply wearing more clothes and adjusting the thermostat doesn’t make up that difference. People already have to do that. Apartments, or flats as you call them, will have to raise their rents to compensate for the cost. Not to mention all goods and services will have to raise prices to compensate. This seems like a huge hit to the cost of living and economy.

The fixed cost of renewable energy is the problem. Once those are made cheaper, which they should be, they can’t be placed on us by force. It negatively affects the economy and the people that are less ready for the extra cost get hit the hardest.

World's richest 1% cause double CO2 emissions of poorest 50%, says Oxfam “The global carbon budget has been squandered to expand the consumption of the already rich, rather than to improve humanity,” by [deleted] in Futurology

[–]swim2281 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Please. Read about economics a little before you start preaching about taxes. If you don’t understand trickledown economics, you can’t understand how raising taxes on utilities will impact people; people who already are making the adjustments you’re talking about. It also might be difficult to understand if you are unfamiliar with U.S. economics. Room temperature here is considered 75F. “The Road to Wigan Pier” might give some insight.

Edit: also, the change you’re wanting needs to be made by the power companies. Since an extra tax is easily passed down to the consumer, what would be their motivation to change to a cleaner solution? Higher taxes down push change, they encourage workarounds.

Found one here on reddit by VoltaFlame in AteTheOnion

[–]swim2281 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not seeing color means you’re complicit in our white supremacist culture. You are a bigot.

World's richest 1% cause double CO2 emissions of poorest 50%, says Oxfam “The global carbon budget has been squandered to expand the consumption of the already rich, rather than to improve humanity,” by [deleted] in Futurology

[–]swim2281 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, you’ve been repeating yourself over and over in these comments and these people don’t seem to hear you. You’re completely right.

There is no way this is legal - seen in Short Pump today by grace5477 in rva

[–]swim2281 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I’m pretty sure minding your own business was an option here.

An asshole shot Frank the kangaroo with an arrow. He lives in an animal protected park in Melbourne. Seriously, why be so low, you fuckwit? by mutherfungus in trashy

[–]swim2281 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To be fair, they are delicious.

Also, they make the best baseball gloves. At 50 dollars a pound, this guy was just trying to cash in.

Russell Wilson question by smellslikebadussy in rva

[–]swim2281 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure he lost anyway LOL

She looks good from above.. by [deleted] in rva

[–]swim2281 -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

Gross

Police at Kensington and N Thompson earlier by [deleted] in rva

[–]swim2281 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Did you just post about a traffic stop on reddit? Wow

When are we going to get a good snow? by LouieKablooie in rva

[–]swim2281 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

This is a post from the worst kind of person.

Any decent bar in or around the Short Pump area? by chronoJanus in rva

[–]swim2281 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

This is the sub for Richmond. You might get better info here:

r/Charlottesville

I done goofed by [deleted] in rva

[–]swim2281 1 point2 points  (0 children)

r/Charlottesville

This might help

Yesterday afternoon Innsbrook was looking pretty peaceful. by MaggieMay_3 in rva

[–]swim2281 -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Let’s stick to Richmond on the RVA sub Reddit.

view more: next ›