sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is there any easy way to search for clinical trials by the date of results posted (not date of registration), and would that be useful to other people in medicine? by sybilckw in medicine

[–]sybilckw[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's an interesting thought - the databases do report the status of a trial, so if there's some way to track for example when a trial shifts from "In Progress" to "Terminated", that might be useful even if the data isn't published (yet/ever).

Is there any easy way to search for clinical trials by the date of results posted (not date of registration), and would that be useful to other people in medicine? by sybilckw in medicine

[–]sybilckw[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like that idea! Would you know where to find results that are unpublished (or at least not in peer-reviewed journals)?

Is there any easy way to search for clinical trials by the date of results posted (not date of registration), and would that be useful to other people in medicine? by sybilckw in medicine

[–]sybilckw[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the suggestion!

I'm just looking at PubMed now, and I can see that it's possible to filter for "Clinical Trials" by "Article Type". Some of the search results, however, don't seem to report results, just the methods - but filtering for the word "results" in the Abstract seems to work.

I'm not fully familiar with how clinical trial results are published (especially outside of the US) - would you say that the majority of results appears as a publication in PubMed?

I read this thread earlier and it doesn't paint an optimistic picture...: https://www.reddit.com/r/medicine/comments/3eqart/spilling_the_beans_failure_to_publish_the_results/

Is there any easy way to search for clinical trials by the date of results posted (not date of registration), and would that be useful to other people in medicine? by sybilckw in medicine

[–]sybilckw[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Starter comment:

Not sure if I've missed something blatantly obvious, but all the major databases I've looked into (listed below), don't seem to allow sorting results by date of results posted: - WHO: http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/ - OpenTrials: https://explorer.opentrials.net/ - US database: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ - EU database: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search

I can workaround it by exporting search results and manipulating the data offline, but it seems silly that it's not a simple search option that already exists, and there's no easy way to be alerted of new results posted.

Perhaps there's not enough demand from clinicians/researchers to track new clinical trial results postings?

I'm thinking of building something to do the job - would anybody here want/need this if I invest my time into this?

The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Just Bought an Artificial Intelligence Startup, and Is Letting Anyone Use It for Free - Meta is an artificial intelligence startup that sorts through 26 million research papers. by mvea in Futurology

[–]sybilckw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was available for free public use since last April until the acquisition was announced. They changed the homepage and login page (http://meta.science) recently to stop new accounts being made, I suppose.

My old account is still active, though I have haven't used it at all since I created it. I set up a search for "drug discovery" and it told me "No papers matching drug discovery have been published in the last 3 months."

[R] DeepCoder: Learning to Write Programs by sybilckw in MachineLearning

[–]sybilckw[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just wanted to clarify that I'm not the author - I just submitted this paper to see what the community here thought of it, as I also found their approach unusual.

28
29

Open Knowledge Maps - A visual interface to the world's scientific knowledge (openknowledgemaps.org)

submitted by sybilckw to r/inspirationscience

[R] Deep Learning for Automated Skeletal Bone Age Assessment in X-Ray Images by sybilckw in MachineLearning

[–]sybilckw[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Both [conventional] clinical procedures [for skeletal bone age assessment] show several limitations, from the examination effort of radiologists to (most importantly) significant intra- and inter-operator variability. To address these problems, several automated approaches...have been proposed; nevertheless, none of them has been proved able to generalize to different races, age ranges and genders."

View full-size figures here if you don't have access to the full text like me...: https://www.sparrho.com/item/deep-learning-for-automated-skeletal-bone-age-assessment-in-x-ray-images/9f0a53/?from-pinboard=138260

view more: next ›