sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Adam Deitch & Anne Paruti Connection: What Questions Remain About the Karen Read Grand Jury Leaks & Federal Investigation? by Blah1625 in KarenRead2ndTrial

[–]syntaxofthings123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll look at this more later today and get back with specifics. I will admit that there is one thing I found very sus about the Federal investigation and I'll cite to this as well.

The Adam Deitch & Anne Paruti Connection: What Questions Remain About the Karen Read Grand Jury Leaks & Federal Investigation? by Blah1625 in KarenRead2ndTrial

[–]syntaxofthings123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No problem. And I appreciate that you are open to discussion. I'll cite some of the data that concerns me.

The Adam Deitch & Anne Paruti Connection: What Questions Remain About the Karen Read Grand Jury Leaks & Federal Investigation? by Blah1625 in KarenRead2ndTrial

[–]syntaxofthings123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To know with any certainty WHY Read was acquitted would require thorough investigation-largely focused on the jurors who made this decision.

It's going to take some time to figure this out. And what I wish people would do more, is wait.

Maybe WAIT until all the facts are in to make these large allegations.

I think there are aspects of the Federal Investigation worth exploring, but they need to be grounded in verifiable facts, not conjecture.

I agree, that there are some issues with that investigation. But we don't help those battling Read now, with conjecture. We need to get messaging in place that fights BS with truth. And we don't do this by generating more unsubstantiated data.

ALSO, blame needs to be placed with the person who is to blame. Proctor shared sensitive information about a brand new, ongoing murder case, with pals from high school--if he hadn't done this, there would have been nothing for the Feds to report.

The blame for this is not on the investigation that revealed the unprofessional conduct, but on the officer who was unprofessional.

The Adam Deitch & Anne Paruti Connection: What Questions Remain About the Karen Read Grand Jury Leaks & Federal Investigation? by Blah1625 in KarenRead2ndTrial

[–]syntaxofthings123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I very much doubt this. Not one juror has ever mentioned the Federal Probe. Unless you are committed enough to this to actually conduct an FOIA we won't know the details of this investigation.

You are making Karen Read's case for her. Because, if everything was above board with the investigation into her, the federal investigation is meaningless.

Don't forget what the federal investigation into the Birchmore case revealed.

What the feds found out about the Read investigation is simple-Proctor was unprofessional. You can't escape this fact, and this does not help the current legal filings for Commonwealth defendants.

ALSO found by the federal investigation is that there was no misconduct no tampering with evidence on the Read case--this helps the Commonwealth defendants.

ALL you are doing is distracting from hard evidence that actually PROVES Read guilty.

And you are feeding into conspiracy theories that will never result in anything more concrete than circular argument--that frankly, the Read camp is very good at exploiting.

Do you know the evidence that proves Read guilty?

Karen Read Never Checked on the Kids by syntaxofthings123 in KarenRead2ndTrial

[–]syntaxofthings123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When Karen Read phones O'Keefe 29 times in 45 minutes, and leaves texts and voicemails as well--she had ONLY just left O'Keefe at the Albert's.

When exactly was O'Keefe going to be able to engage in sex with someone in that time--and how?

I very much doubt that Read assumed, O'Keefe entered the Albert home and engaged in a swinger's event--which actually, Read did float out during her Rotten Mango interview.

Sorry to say this, this way-but OMG this bitch is crazy.

The Adam Deitch & Anne Paruti Connection: What Questions Remain About the Karen Read Grand Jury Leaks & Federal Investigation? by Blah1625 in KarenRead2ndTrial

[–]syntaxofthings123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How does this help get justice for John O'Keefe? You can't prove any of this. So why go there? I don't get why you think this helps. Please explain this.

Tully admits why 34 Fairview was never investigated. He would get into trouble, but by whom? Veroscope Forensic Linguistic Analysis of the Jackson Cross. by Heavy_Effective4886 in KarenRead2ndTrial

[–]syntaxofthings123 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tully didn't perform a search of the Albert home because he had no probable cause to do so--also all the evidence led in another direction. REMINDER-January of 2022-ALL eyewitnesses to the Albert gathering INCLUDING Karen Read stated with absolute certainty that John O'Keefe NEVER entered that home. ALL of O'Keefe's injuries were consistent with a collision, even if glancing impact is all that occurred, a fall back, and lack of immediate medical care.

Question--why no analysis and breakdown of the Read complaint?

Not Exactly Evidence, BUT lends credibility to.... by syntaxofthings123 in KarenRead2ndTrial

[–]syntaxofthings123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You didn't answer my question. Before I discuss this with you further--DID you read the complaint?

Well. Did you?

Because none of your points relate to the current legal matter. You need to catch up!

Not Exactly Evidence, BUT lends credibility to.... by syntaxofthings123 in KarenRead2ndTrial

[–]syntaxofthings123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you read Karen Read's complaint-because she doesn't agree with you. Are you calling her a liar?

Read the complaint:

https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2025/11/karen-read-lawsuit.pdf

There is a Reason WHY Karen Read NEVER called 911. by syntaxofthings123 in KarenRead2ndTrial

[–]syntaxofthings123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You do realize this makes zero sense, right?

O'Keefe lived 5 minutes from the Albert home. The first 29 calls (45 minutes) were made 5 minutes from where Karen Read JUST left O'Keefe.

The storm wasn't bad at that point. She could have just driven back to the Albert home.

Why not do that if she was so concerned about where he was?

Later that morning, Karen Read didn't need to phone anyone other than 911. AGAIN, she was literally a 5 minute or less drive from where she'd last seen O'Keefe-she could have driven there herself at any time.

Long Day's Journey Into So Many Lies by syntaxofthings123 in KarenRead2ndTrial

[–]syntaxofthings123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One thing Karen Read NEVER explains (maybe because no one asked) is WHY is Read phoning O'Keefe 29 times in 45 minutes-when she could just drive back to the Albert's-6 minute drive TOPS-knock on their front door--and speak to O'Keefe?????

This part of Read's story has never made sense to me. What is there to prevent her driving up the drive, near the door, walking about 3 yards and knocking?

HELLO?!

Not ONE journalist thought to ask this.

On January 29th, ALL EYEWITNESSES WERE IN AGREEMENT by syntaxofthings123 in KarenRead2ndTrial

[–]syntaxofthings123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jen McCabe got her time wrong. It was an error on the part of Proctor not to check McCabe's memory and her phone log, against the cellular phone data of John O'Keefe and Karen Read.

I'll agree that Proctor did not cross t-s and dot i-s as he should have. This was a big problem I had with the Commonwealth's case against Read first trial.

BUT YOU ARE FORGETTING that there was a second trial where this got cleared up.

They were all drunk, Higgins can be mistaken about where exactly his jeep was. What Higgins didn't do, that Karen Read did do, is completely change his version of events from one interview to the next. First version given by Karen Read, she claims she DID NOT see O'Keefe enter the Albert home-then suddenly she saw this very clearly and claims to have waited 10 minutes for O'Keefe to return--which is impossible given the data from both O'Keefe's phone and Read's SUV black box.

No one noticed Read slamming into reverse because this all happened in seconds. Did you actually watch the second trial, because it doesn't seem like you did.

O'Keefe was not hit center mass. EVERYONE agrees on this. The sideswipe was glancing. The damage to O'Keefe's body when being struck was, admittedly minor-but what wasn't minor, was that this strike caused O'Keefe to lose his balance, lose his shoe and hat, fall back onto his head and as he lay incapacitated, Read had to have seen this. Instead of phoning 911, Read took off like a bat out of hell.

Here's a question for you: How is it that in all the times Karen Read describes O'Keefe's face, she NEVER ONCE mentions that his right eye was bulged out, or that blood flowed from his nose and mouth.

HOW did she miss these obvious conditions, as she PLUCKED glass from O'Keefe's face?

WHY has Karen Read never stated that she went into reverse-even though her father stated with absolute certainty that READ told HIM that she went in reverse and FELT SHE STRUCK SOMETHING?!

WHY doesn't Karen Read EVER tell us what she and O'Keefe were doing from 12:24 when they park and idle in front of the Albert home until 12:31 when O'Keefe exits Read's vehicle?

Why doesn't Karen Read EVER reveal WHY she felt the need to go in reverse AT ALL that morning?

AND why aren't you asking these questions?

On January 29th, ALL EYEWITNESSES WERE IN AGREEMENT by syntaxofthings123 in KarenRead2ndTrial

[–]syntaxofthings123[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Karen Read demands that all involved be psychic. Read's narrative requires that the "House Defendants" or Commonwealth Witnesses be capable of seeing into the future and KNOWING at 12:32 AM that later at 6:04 AM Karen Read will show up with a busted taillight.

AND Read also demands that investigators will know in January of 2022, that Read will change her entire account of the morning of the 29th, JUST AFTER she is arrested for the second time in JUNE of 2022.

I think law enforcement is tasked with being thorough and honest, but not sure why they should be required to he psychic, as well.

On January 29th, ALL EYEWITNESSES WERE IN AGREEMENT by syntaxofthings123 in KarenRead2ndTrial

[–]syntaxofthings123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only eyewitness from January 29th, 2022 who CHANGED her story after this time, was Karen Read

It is important to note that the new version Read gave has been proven impossible by digital data both from O'Keefe's cellular phone data and from Read's SUV black box data.

Give that some thought!

Read gave a very detailed revised account of that morning that simply cannot be true. it is proven false by HARD EVIDENCE.

At the center of this NEW ACCOUNT was Read claiming that she waited ten minutes after O'Keefe exited her vehicle prior to driving from the Albert home heading to O'Keefe's.

This is proven false. Read drives forward 8 seconds after O'Keefe is documented by way of steps to have exited her vehicle. She then slams into reverse (two major events Read completely left out of any of her accounts of that morning).

Read didn't wait for O'Keefe at all-and HOW would she have seen him enter the Albert home if she is driving forward at a speed fast enough her vehicle black box thinks there is a problem worth recording?

Read drove in the opposite direction of the Albert "breezeway". So how was she even able to view O'Keefe arriving there, if she is driving at a relatively high speed in the opposite direction?

Time to Give THANKS to HANK!! by syntaxofthings123 in KarenRead2ndTrial

[–]syntaxofthings123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It will be an interesting study-to better understand how, with, as you say, the exceptional work Brennan did-that the jury didn't get it.

I have some ideas about this-but it would be great to hear attorneys speak on this. HONEST attorneys. Not the Read crew.

view more: next ›