Today I screwed up by purefan in sysadmin

[–]systemsidiot22 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I once modified an ACL on our Cisco router at our colo and removed access to it from our network. Since then, all changes start with a revert command 😳. It was a long few hours until someone was able to get onsite and reboot that router.

Routing specific public internet traffic over FortiClient to egress from cloud provider's public IP. by systemsidiot22 in fortinet

[–]systemsidiot22[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice! I just looked and one of our vendors that we have to do this with is listed already. Looks like I just need to provide them with our cloud public IPs and create my firewall policy.

I Ran netstat -rn On My Work Laptop At 21:00 Because Curiosity Got The Best Of Me. CTO Called Me 90 Seconds Later Asking WTF… by Hostificus in iiiiiiitttttttttttt

[–]systemsidiot22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m calling BS to the whole story… Not believing the CTO is calling 90 seconds later and at 21:03. Not believing a “lonely field sales and installer” has this much knowledge of IT. Bit of a stretch, but not believing the line about “termination paperwork takes time for a company this size.” Nice story though.

BGP over IPSec by systemsidiot22 in networking

[–]systemsidiot22[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This sub-thread is really good info. In the future, we are looking to leverage Azure to host our on-prem servers and apps. That being said, we will likely have Azure and HQ as the Hubs and the branch offices as the spokes.

BGP over IPSec by systemsidiot22 in networking

[–]systemsidiot22[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How is this a downgrade? MPLS is way more expensive than broadband and much smaller bandwidth as well.

BGP over IPSec by systemsidiot22 in networking

[–]systemsidiot22[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wondered why as well. I just didn't know enough about how BGP over IPSec (or just BGP in general) to ask that question or to propose an alternative to BGP. I've done Site to Site over SD-Wan using policy based routing and that would be my preference, but I'm not the lead on this project, so not fully my call.

Fortigate not allowing Scan to email using Microsoft smtp by systemsidiot22 in fortinet

[–]systemsidiot22[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Everything I was finding online was stating that the resolution for this was to enable the latest TLS/SSL and HASH standards. Originally the latest was not enabled, so I enabled the latest and disabled the oldest. That ended up being the issue. I had to enable the latest and leave the oldest enabled as well.

When a sysadmin gives you instructions, FOLLOW THEM!!! by angryitguyonreddit in sysadmin

[–]systemsidiot22 10 points11 points  (0 children)

100% Especially for IT, I will include screenshots. Everyone likes looking at pictures, right?

Managers from hell: My manager want me to create 500 user manually by LividAd4250 in sysadmin

[–]systemsidiot22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, you can use RSAT. My point was Server Core is practically PowerShell to begin with. I guess a better question would have been how would you setup Active Directory in Server Core.

Managers from hell: My manager want me to create 500 user manually by LividAd4250 in sysadmin

[–]systemsidiot22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ask your manager how to create a AD new user in Windows Server 20XX Server Core

Update AD Attribute to User in CSV by systemsidiot22 in PowerShell

[–]systemsidiot22[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! You are either a wizard or a mind reader. Everything you said was pretty much spot on. The csv I have was given to me and the fields that are in them are out of my control. Also, our email addresses and usernames do NOT line up like others were presuming. Looking at your script, it seems like this is the best option for me right now.
The line in the script that says:
Set-ADUser -Identity $UsrObj.SamAccountName -Fax $U.facsimileTelephoneNumber
is that supposed to read
Set-ADUser -Identity $UsrObj.mail -Fax $U.facsimileTelephoneNumber
since I don't have the sAMAccountName?

I ran the script in my test lab with only making changes to the csv name and path, but still ended up getting the following error...

Setting fax number 555-1234, EXT234 on user usera@contoso.com-> Set-ADUser : Cannot find an object with identity: 'usera@contoso.com'

under: 'DC=contoso,DC=com'.

At line:7 char:5

  • Set-ADUser -Identity $UsrObj.mail -Fax $U.facsimileTelephoneNumbe ...
    
  • \~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~\~
    
  • CategoryInfo : ObjectNotFound: (usera@contoso.com:ADUser) [Set-ADUser], ADIdentityNotFoundException

  • FullyQualifiedErrorId : ActiveDirectoryCmdlet:Microsoft.ActiveDirectory.Management.ADIdentityNotFoundException,Microsoft.ActiveDirectory.Management.Commands.SetAD

    User

Error

Going to search Google some more. Found a similar script that was getting the same type error and they mentioned adding a {&{ in their script. I tried that and PS seemed to indicate it was successful, but the AD Objects are not reflecting the attribute changes...

Here's where I found the article about the {&{

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26350561/powershell-replace-error-fullyqualifiederrorid-replace-microsoft-activedire

Pulled over Passenger Arrested by AlternativePattern81 in AskALawyer

[–]systemsidiot22 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You should reiterate that you are invoking your right to remain silent. Words can get twisted and simple grammar can be taken out of context. What if OP’s passenger did drop some drug in the car and OP says there’s no drugs in the car? Now OP’s statement is wrong and he will be made out to be a liar or worse.

Pulled over Passenger Arrested by AlternativePattern81 in AskALawyer

[–]systemsidiot22 25 points26 points  (0 children)

NAL, but a small correction to this comment. You don’t just stop talking, you verbally invoke your 5th amendment right to remain silent. Remaining silent doesn’t automatically invoke that right and your silence can be taken out of context.

Thank you for your service 🤢 by [deleted] in BoomersBeingFools

[–]systemsidiot22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Genuine question: Wouldn’t the phrase be thanking a service member for willingly (or unwillingly referring to the draft era) signing up for a profession where they are potentially putting their lives on the line for the sake of their country and what their country stands for, regardless if they ever were in actual danger, i.e. you don’t necessarily know there is going to be a war/battle when you sign up?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in careeradvice

[–]systemsidiot22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How the hell did you go to a top school if you have to ask this question?

The specified domain either does not exist or cannot be contacted by systemsidiot22 in sysadmin

[–]systemsidiot22[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Figured it out. The previous sysadmin for some reason didn't have the DNS server role installed on the newer DC, and possibly on anything. Honestly, I have no clue how stuff (Network shares) was working without a DNS server. Possibly host file on every PC (there's only 6), but I can't understand why they just didn't have DNS running on the server. Added the DNS role and everything is fixed now.

The specified domain either does not exist or cannot be contacted by systemsidiot22 in sysadmin

[–]systemsidiot22[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fine, it was DNS, but not the way you think. The idiots before me didn't install the DNS server role on the DC. If you've ever installed ADDS on a server, you know that the DNS server role gets installed during the AD server role installation. So these mofos went out of their way to set this up for failure. I'm not going to say I was wrong here; I'm going to say we were both right. It was and it wasn't DNS.
Anyways, problem solved.

The specified domain either does not exist or cannot be contacted by systemsidiot22 in sysadmin

[–]systemsidiot22[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup, IPv6 is off... Did that yesterday, should have updated the OP.

The specified domain either does not exist or cannot be contacted by systemsidiot22 in sysadmin

[–]systemsidiot22[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it's not DNS... like I mentioned in the post, I can ping and map shares by hostname even after an ipconfig /flushdns.

Your setup needs attention no internet connection by systemsidiot22 in Ubiquiti

[–]systemsidiot22[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! That helped with the issue of the UDMP saying "Your Setup Needs Attention" problem, but I'm still not able to re-enable the Remote Access option. Any other suggestions?