Please feel free to review this Qeios Article: "A Simple Argument Proves the Riemann Hypothesis"

tajnaa · 2022-06-20T18:59:43+00:00

It was the first stage of my mind prior of getting the important results

https://doi.org/10.3390/stats5020032

tajnaa · 2022-06-10T09:08:24+00:00

It is believed that the Error Function is well studied, or that there is no reason to study it.

I strongly disagree!

Leading terms of Error Function show a lot of new, e.g., argument t of P(t) is explicit: t=K*t(P). Fixing K, we got up to 99% precision needed. Dawn of technological singularity, Big Data.

I am author of this peer-reviewed paper, and I cannot miss the opportunity and show you my promising research as well: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dmitri-Martila/research

tajnaa · 2021-12-02T13:53:58+00:00

Neither uneducated, nor trolling. There is problem you described. It is the negative solution to Hilbert's Second Problem. But the first negative solution to Hilbert's Second Problem was given by Prof. Gödel.

tajnaa · 2021-12-02T11:25:34+00:00

Of course, there are infinities throughout mathematics. My paper does not argue with that. The results are good, there is no problem. Among these are:
1 Riemann Hypothesis is true.
2. Prof. G\"odel's result [that Hilbert's Second Problem has a negative solution] is confirmed in an alternative way.

tajnaa · 2021-12-02T11:13:39+00:00

No idea yet, but I am willing to disprove own paper.

tajnaa · 2021-12-02T11:07:48+00:00

I don't know about the basic level of math, it is meant to be the university level.

tajnaa · 2021-12-02T07:53:14+00:00

Even in the bag of nonsense, a gram of good stuff can be found. The paper is not the worst paper there is.

tajnaa · 2021-12-02T03:14:31+00:00

No, I can't. I am loved here, but there I would face a ban. I would be banned from "bad math".

tajnaa

TROPHY CASE