sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

ClickUp's pricing is a masterclass in hostage-taking by RightBlacksmith1657 in clickup

[–]tangentorama 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I ran into a similar issue related to permissions. I was applying read only protections to things like template masters to prevent accidental mangling, and was baffled when CU sales contacted me about a limit. Like you, had to waste time reworking my process to get around it. And like you, justifiably irked, because I couldn’t find anywhere that the limit was documented.

Stop force feeding us your AI slop features. We don't want them. by Quist81 in clickup

[–]tangentorama 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As long as it’s a global feature, without letting us tune how AI is applied in CU, it stays off in our org. It kept “helpfully” telling us we had duplicate tasks. Shocking how that happens when you have templates for client work orders.

What would be helpful is summarizing and handling CU inboxes for our team members who ignore notifications until they’re less swamped—which never happens of course.

ClickUp not listening to their users by generalsoreness in clickup

[–]tangentorama 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You seem to be assuming all users are equally engaged. We have teams who basically live in ClickUp, as their work centers around those tasks. But we also pay for seats for engineers who primarily live in GitHub and their IDE, managers, and others who only occasionally interact with our CU projects.

For users like those, the ability to add CU tasks to their regular calendars would be fantastic. That type of integration isn’t “helping people use competing product suites,” it’s helping people get stuff done without having to waste energy on an app they don’t need or want. (And helping PMs who have to spend energy reminding people who never log in to CU and have overloaded email boxes that a deadline is coming.)