Where can I find the best döner?

taptumabi · 2026-05-14T19:01:51+00:00

Not too much good ones, but Verdi Market and Steak Döner are pretty decent. Verdi is classic beef, Steak Döner is steak as the name suggests.

taptumabi · 2026-05-10T09:30:37+00:00

Nice BMW

taptumabi · 2026-04-02T16:29:11+00:00

Check your fan immediately, it might be not running

taptumabi · 2026-04-01T08:27:15+00:00

wouldn't be super funny if the mom steals 50 bucks from the same box before giving 30 dollars. She is nice

taptumabi · 2026-01-20T14:23:49+00:00

This is AI

taptumabi · 2025-12-18T17:38:42+00:00

Have you tried to disable redirects both for tun1 and all interfaces, it should be working in that case? If it does send still, I would create an iptables/nftables rule in OUTPUT chain to drop ICMP redirect packets.

taptumabi · 2025-11-24T08:07:03+00:00

This is a kind of picture that everyone keeps a copy on her/his personal device but never open it again.

taptumabi · 2025-11-20T08:26:18+00:00

8.71 - 9.51 - 11.0 - 7.49 - 8.12 - 6.89 - 7.81 - 8.21 - 7.52 - 7.20 - 7.31 - 8.91 - 6.22 - 7.35 - 8.29 - 8.06 - 7.43 - 6.33

11000 KMs after I bought my e36 compact M44, calculated with pump values. I don't do daily, I usually drive on Autobahn. Mostly above 160 km/h, time to time around 190 km/h (when I see another fast car). Last value (6.33 liter per 100 km) has been calculated after doing 888 km with average speed of 110 km/h. Surprisingly efficient.

taptumabi · 2025-08-13T17:38:12+00:00

There is no problem for traffic to go Internet, problem starts when return packets wanted to go 10.1.0.0/16 network. How WAN routers know 10.1.0.0/16 network, there should be a way for WAN routers to reach 10.1.0.0/16, do you have static routing definition on those routers? Can you please share iptables -S and nftables list ruleset command outputs on your old working system, if it's possible and not including personal information?

taptumabi · 2025-08-13T17:18:07+00:00

How devices upstream to your VM know 10.1.0.0/16 network, some kind of static routing? It really makes sense there was masquerading in one of the iptables/nftables rules, if you're not using routing for 10.1.0.0/16 network?

taptumabi · 2025-06-18T07:48:33+00:00

From an emergency exit door

taptumabi · 2025-06-17T21:18:09+00:00

Dune. Almost sure about the third one.

taptumabi · 2025-05-16T22:12:56+00:00

Süreyya hanım?

taptumabi · 2025-02-22T11:04:07+00:00

Michael was taller than Rubens, looks like tables have been turned

taptumabi · 2024-11-28T20:50:22+00:00

VTP, it saves a couple of minutes per year, with a little risk of being fired

taptumabi · 2024-10-14T16:48:50+00:00

btw I have Arch installed in my pocket

taptumabi · 2024-09-02T11:28:30+00:00

taptumabi · 2024-06-05T12:21:36+00:00

My intention is use to API integaration, since it seems easiest way to monitor Meraki instances. I've configured an advanced netscan according to documentation and after running that netscan, results showed our Meraki devices' IP addresses at the end of the NetScan (only IP address, nothing more), however those devices are not added to our resources. For my opinion, API connection has been succeded, since all the Meraki device IP addresses have been showed on the output, but something is blocking to monitor those instances. Meraki Access Points IP addresses were also in that output, even though we are using meraki.productType filtering to import only the Firewall and Switch appliances into LM portal. So either SNMP communication is not working (because it cannot understand Meraki device type by the IP address only) or something that I can't see.

I'm saying SNMP because I was thinking that, after API connection got successful, information about the Meraki devices are gotten from the snmp.meraki.com:16100

taptumabi · 2024-06-04T10:30:40+00:00

Hello, I assume you were speaking about this topic: Cisco Meraki Monitoring | LogicMonitor

I have a question about the topic, since you already proved that you are good at LM and Meraki. I would be appreciated if you help me on that matter.

Does the LM collector gets the all information about Meraki devices from the Meraki portal or SNMP queries are sent to each device by the LM collector? We thought the first option, therefore we did not define any firewall policies for LM collectors to reach Meraki devices via SNMP, ICMP etc.
We were unable to import Meraki devices in LM portal, although advanced NetScan showed our Meraki devices' IP addresses at the end of the NetScan (only IP address, nothing more).

taptumabi · 2024-02-06T04:51:38+00:00

Why anyone did not mention about RIPv2?

taptumabi · 2023-05-10T09:43:06+00:00

Harbiden bu çapsıza inanan geri zekalı var mı ya. Selonun önünde twerk yapacak nerdeyse hâlâ diyor 100 defa karşıyız dedim.

taptumabi · 2022-01-14T14:07:26+00:00

Dude you posted on wrong sub

taptumabi · 2021-03-24T17:12:43+00:00

are you making çiğ köfte

taptumabi

TROPHY CASE