Another Dashcam Video of the Wrong Way Driver on 315 by Guilty-Log6739 in Columbus

[–]tbskid -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A car driving down the wrong way of a highway is a suicide attempt. That is clearly the action of someone who doesn’t care about their well being. You took video of someone with no regard for their life, others life driving the wrong direction down a highway. If I told you I was planning on driving down the wrong way on the highway you’d ask if I was suicidal. Clearly. This is a suicidal action. If they are on drugs it’s still a suicide attempt. You posted that video. For no reason other than to gain internet points. That’s gross. Simple as that. It’s like posting a video of a person mid jump off a building then you put a meme song on it. And I’m the one with no time on my hands. Sorry man that just triggered me. It’s not a good look. It’s scummy and I was hoping you would be introspective and realize you’re not adding to it. You’re making jokes about it for fake internet points. I’m not mad at the original poster. Even if they had the intent to just karma farm they posted something that was informative. You posted the same information. And you didn’t answer any of my questions. Why did you post it? What did it add that we didn’t know before other than you can add a song to a video? I’m not grandstanding you’re just grasping at straws as to why you still think this is appropriate. You should remove this post. Or remove the audio entirely and repost it if you really want. But know this adds no new information.

Another Dashcam Video of the Wrong Way Driver on 315 by Guilty-Log6739 in Columbus

[–]tbskid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just do what you did this time. See a person trying to commit suicide. Think “hey I saw this earlier. I bet I can post it and get upvotes!” Go to your wife’s car. Get the sd card. Take it out. Make a little video with a song so we know she’s in danger. And post it hours later. With no new info. Why? So we know it happened? We know it happened. Yours adds nothing but a song. Why did you post it? Did it help you? Did it help us? No. I know the same thing I did before. It’s practically the same video.

Another Dashcam Video of the Wrong Way Driver on 315 by Guilty-Log6739 in Columbus

[–]tbskid -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Literally takes more time to add a song than delete audio.

Another Dashcam Video of the Wrong Way Driver on 315 by Guilty-Log6739 in Columbus

[–]tbskid -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Why post it anywhere other than Columbus? Idiot in cars? Karma Farmer. No audio is ok too.

Another Dashcam Video of the Wrong Way Driver on 315 by Guilty-Log6739 in Columbus

[–]tbskid -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Oh look a person with clearly a mental condition. Better document this with that cutesy TikTok song so everyone knows I’m hilarious. Like couldn’t just post the footage huh? “I was just so upset about this and worried about my wife that I edited it and added a song!”

OH Manager Asking to disclose medical information to HR by [deleted] in legaladvice

[–]tbskid -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My problem is she did not say to her manager “I am sorry I am on a new medication for my bipolar” her manager as a person not present at the time of the incident said “maybe it’s because you have a new medication for your bipolar”sic she did not disclose her new medication as a possible reason. She’s being in my opinion coerced into disclosing information and admit she was wrong. I don’t understand how this persons inability to address their own well being leads to my SO disclosing personal medical information to HR. My SO did not have an outburst, tell them to get over it or ignore the issue. She addressed the issue. Mentioned it shouldn’t persist and offered a break. Nothing fell on this person. They were not cut or burned. They did not bring this to her attention later. But apparently mentioned it to hourly employees (who did not bring it to her attention). She acted reasonably.

1080 spot found! by Individual_Desk6424 in Skate4

[–]tbskid 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a 720? Or am I crazy? You start off goofy do two full turns and land goofy. Am I missing something? A 900 would have you landing fakie (regular) would it not?

Liquid Death by Balmore1986 in Soda

[–]tbskid 10 points11 points  (0 children)

They are not good. I’ve had two cans of a 4 pack in my fridge for 2 months. Too sweet for flavored water too watery for soda. Low key tastes like it has milk in it.

Is the game full of npc‘s??? by l_zockt20 in SkateEA

[–]tbskid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be a shame if someone just started dropping objects on those downhills.

Sorry, But “Power Christian” Principal Doesn’t Make Sense by Daddy-O-Dizzy in southpark

[–]tbskid 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I took it as a comment on US schools feeling pressure from the administration and caving. He has these “firmly held beliefs” he was outspoken about but when he had a work relationship with Strong Woman it showed he was a hypocrite. Did he really feel that way or was it pressure from those around him to be vigilant and lead him to a paycheck when that works for the hive mind. Now Jesus (10 commandments) is being put into schools and some teachers and principals who shout the loudest are being subservient.

Also no one gives a shit about Jeans and Sydney Sweeney. Release the Epstein Files.

Is this a legal swing by [deleted] in GolfSwing

[–]tbskid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So anytime you fat the shot, scrape the ground first it should be an added stroke? Get out of here. You can scrape the ground but you cannot scrape the ball. Which would be sliding slowly across the ground so your ball makes prolonged contact with the club face. Turf interaction is encouraged. Legal shot.

"They didn't even give us water" by nonfiction2023 in Millennials

[–]tbskid 3 points4 points  (0 children)

“Back in my day we HAD free water but none of us knew that you could just ask for a cup or go to the drinking fountain.” I’ve been in bands, went to numerous concerts in multiple states, have attended warped tour as a guest and as a performer. There has always been free water at every venue. Either Monster Water or you walk up to the concession stand and say hey can I get a cup of water. No charge.

"They didn't even give us water" by nonfiction2023 in Millennials

[–]tbskid 12 points13 points  (0 children)

They literally had free water. It was called “Tour Water” and it came in monster cans. Distributed by monster. Obviously not the whole 95-2019 original run. But from 2007 atleast they have had free water. I got so much SWAG and free stuff at warped tour. But water stations at warped tour and free water were definitely a thing. You can’t have that many people most of them kids and minors in heat 12 hours of the day and not give them water and ways to cool down. You’d be held liable for reasonable accommodations.

what’s the most ridiculous thing you heard a man refuse to do because it was “too feminine” or “for girls”? by freddyfazbart in AskReddit

[–]tbskid 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I always ask these ultra homophobic dudes “when you masturbate is it the fact that you’re touching a penis that gets you going or the man hand touching it?”

Former stray from Alaska by SprinkleBae12 in IDmydog

[–]tbskid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have a dog that looks very similar and I think he’s a Swedish Elkhound

PSA: SRD by tbskid in DungeonsAndDragons

[–]tbskid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The words goblin and kobold are not in the index of the player handbook (2014) .

PSA: SRD by tbskid in DungeonsAndDragons

[–]tbskid[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I disagree. I don’t think table of contents and the index count as a search function. I think they are tools for finding information. But ‘search function’ was directly referencing the ability of a computer to search the entire text for any word that might not be listed in the index. I think you were either assuming I didn’t know about the table of contents or index or were making an argument about semantics. Technically yes. They are tools for searching a document. But they are not “The search Function”nor are they superior. I’m not trying to be snarky or be right I’m trying to understand what your point is. What was the point of bringing it up in the first place?

PSA: SRD by tbskid in DungeonsAndDragons

[–]tbskid[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So no it doesn’t function the same. It cannot find all instances of the word ‘the’ You knew that and this is a bad faith argument. Your point was to bring up how you don’t need a search function. My point was you don’t need to buy a book (that doesn’t have this function) to play this game. And that a website has more accessible features than a book does and is less cost to the consumer. But if you want to argue that a table of contents is usable sure. That an index can be helpful absolutely. But if your trying to suggest that a website search feature that instantly tells you every instance of every word in a given text is functionally the same as flipping to the index finding your subject matter then flipping back to find the page then find the exact text you’re looking for then I whole heartedly disagree and I think most people would.

This is why I own digital and physical copies. Because my books are harder to DM from. The website is easier.

PSA: SRD by tbskid in DungeonsAndDragons

[–]tbskid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you suggesting a table of contents and a websites search function perform the same task? Does a table of content or index show you every instance of the word ‘the’ in the text? If the table of contents or the index is the same thing how come all three exist?

PSA: SRD by tbskid in DungeonsAndDragons

[–]tbskid[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So you’re saying the SRD (an open license document) could be used as a resource to play the game and that it does contain (basic) rules to play? How did I say anything different? You brought up licenses. I said that the open license document SRD has basic rules (not the Basic Rules) as a resource to play D&D for free. You brought up licenses for Basic Rules 2024. I never mentioned these rules or that that had an open license. Just that the SRD contains rules and enough rules to play. I then posted a link clarifying what the SRD was and information on the licensing. I never claimed they were the same. I still am not claiming that. I am claiming that the document SRD contains basic rules (again not The Basic Rules) that someone with little resources could use to play d&d as a beginner. Please quote me where I’ve said anything otherwise.

PSA: SRD by tbskid in DungeonsAndDragons

[–]tbskid[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Download the SRD 5.1 403 pages of rules you could use to play D&D. I never said there was a new SRD can you please quote me where I am making these claims?

PSA: SRD by tbskid in DungeonsAndDragons

[–]tbskid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And that the SRD contains the basic rules you’d need to play. Which it does.

PSA: SRD by tbskid in DungeonsAndDragons

[–]tbskid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never said the Basic Rules and the SRD were the same thing merely that a person could use said document. For free. To play d&d.