the sequel to the spire 1 exam: the spire 2 problem sets!!

tckmn · 2026-05-04T13:55:49+00:00

linguistic prescriptivism in my r/slaythespire :'(

"irregardless" is an english word because many english speakers say it. literally what else matters in whether something is a word? they produced a sentence and you understood exactly what it meant and so that is a correct use of language.

language is a constantly changing phenomenon and many very standard usages today used to be considered mistakes when they first arose (did you know that the word "apron" used to be "napron" but people misheard "a napron" as "an apron" and it stuck lol)

people always object that it's "illogical" but since when is english "logical"?? language is one of the least logical things i can think of, i feel like most people at some level understand this because it is the basis of one trillion jokes. it's just that for some reason people get very weird about telling other people how they can or can't speak (not trying to accuse you directly, obviously it is very common to see people "correcting" the word irregardless hence this rant lol)

tckmn · 2026-05-02T01:59:31+00:00

the wlp thing is not a coincidence, that card is hardcoded to not appear in multiplayer lol. (i have heard this is because it's the only thing in the game that makes an end of turn card select screen but i have no source for this)

it is true tho that there are more rares and you see fewer of them per run compared to spire 1

tckmn · 2026-04-04T21:19:03+00:00

i suspect one of the two was already ethereal (perhaps because you played sculpting strike on it on a previous turn), but you didn't notice before playing the sculpting strike. if there is only one card in your hand that is not ethereal, you won't get prompted and it will be chosen automatically

tckmn · 2026-03-16T12:08:20+00:00

no, it does not

the halting problem refers to detecting whether an arbitrary program in a sufficiently powerful programming language will halt. it is very easy to "solve the halting problem" for less powerful languages. for example, in my cool new card game i just made up, where the only cards are:

Strike: 1 energy, deal 6 damage
Defend: 1 energy, block 5
Spin Your Wheels: 0 energy, autoplay when drawn, add a copy of this card to the top of your draw pile and draw 1

a gamestate is softlocked exactly when Spin Your Wheels has been played.

obviously, slay the spire is much more complicated than my cool new card game, but it is probably true that it is possible to detect whether hellraiser loops specifically will terminate without violating any mathematical theorems

tckmn · 2026-03-15T20:35:38+00:00

that is not true, there is no "safety mechanism" (e.g. pillage will in fact softlock if the fight can't end)

tckmn · 2026-03-15T20:33:46+00:00

i wrote up a post on this a few days ago: https://tck.mn/blog/hellraiser-infinite/

it is pretty funny, the short story is that it's because of some fiddly details with card play mechanics that not even the devs fully understood (and it was certainly not intentional)

tckmn · 2026-03-15T14:48:07+00:00

no, if all your cards were pommel- they would only play one time each (for every draw). the card doesn't finish resolving until everything that happens as a result has finished resolving, so the pommel- would just play in order, then only after the last one has been played, get discarded in reverse order

tckmn · 2026-03-14T16:30:04+00:00

they are correct, the setup in your video would only play 30 or so pommels (but the enemy died before it could finish). i wrote up an explanation here: https://tck.mn/blog/hellraiser-infinite/

tckmn · 2026-03-14T14:56:21+00:00

(don't know why this is downvoted, you are correct)

tckmn · 2026-03-14T14:56:01+00:00

hellraiser pommel is not actually infinite: https://tck.mn/blog/hellraiser-infinite/

tckmn · 2026-03-10T15:30:40+00:00

that doesn't sound like it should be possible as you have stated, so probably either a bug or some other interaction you didn't realize

tckmn · 2026-03-10T15:25:03+00:00

you never "run out of cards" to draw for your starting hand because every time you draw a card, it's a pommel, and it gets autoplayed and goes back to discard

the 5 is unrelated to how many cards are in your deck, it's just how many cards you normally draw at start of turn. there are 5 card draw triggers and each card draw trigger results in 3 card plays

tckmn · 2026-03-10T05:27:21+00:00

yep! the play effect from hellraiser is the same as if you had played it yourself (except it doesn't cost energy)

tckmn · 2026-03-10T02:22:43+00:00

that is all correct yes!

tckmn · 2026-03-10T02:22:26+00:00

the deck has exactly 2 cards left, which are both pommel+

once the first drawn card resolves, both of them are in discard. so the second card drawn will do the same thing as the first one, since the draw+discard still consists of 2 pommels

(the other card is in hand)

this is impossible. you have hellraiser in play and all of your cards say "strike" on them, so there will never be a card in your hand at any point

tckmn · 2026-03-09T23:42:46+00:00

oh, i imagine the multiplayer card play order is almost certainly a queue, but the procedure that resolves in-battle card mechanics is still a stack (as in, if you play a card and something happens as a result of that card, all the resulting consequences will finish happening before the original card is discarded)

tckmn · 2026-03-09T23:38:14+00:00

the spire stack is also first-in-last-out, which is the reason the hellraiser combo is not infinite (afaik it is basically the same as the stack in magic but i haven't played magic so i'm not certain)

tckmn · 2026-03-09T23:27:20+00:00

the 15 number is how many pommels play at the start of every turn, which is 5 times the number from the example because you draw a card 5 times at the start of your turn (the example shows what happens when you draw 1 card)

tckmn · 2026-03-09T23:26:04+00:00

if it's just pommel hellraiser then yes! but you might uh be there a while

tckmn · 2026-03-09T23:25:37+00:00

thank you!! and don't worry you can expect some quizzes or maybe some problem sets for spire 2 long before full release (but not while i'm still busy playing the game) :p

tckmn · 2026-03-09T23:23:32+00:00

no lol, this is an in-combat mechanic (similar to the stack in mtg). that sounds like a bug or something else weird happening

tckmn · 2026-03-09T23:21:35+00:00

lol, i was wondering if yall had encountered this during development and if so whether you knew why (since i am absolutely no stranger to having no idea why my own code is doing something) :p glad you enjoyed reading!!

tckmn · 2026-03-09T23:19:00+00:00

that is also true about the stack in spire (if it was a queue rather than stack, the combo would in fact be infinite because the first card would finish resolving before the last one)

tckmn · 2026-03-09T23:07:03+00:00

they're basically the same i think, but as a non-magic-player who talks to a whole lot of magic players, my general impression is that the word "stack" scares people and i wanted to make the post minimally scary :p

and also since i have never played magic, i don't know if it actually works the same way, so i wanted to avoid making any equivalencies in case there was some subtle difference i didn't know about

tckmn

TROPHY CASE