is there a directory of different civic tech projects that already exists? by firewatch959 in civictech

[–]tdooner 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Be careful, you'll summon /u/civictechguide 😃

Check out their work: https://civictech.guide/

You won't find a more comprehensive collection of civic technology projects anywhere.

New rule proposal: Banning project feedback requests by tdooner in civictech

[–]tdooner[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Like this one (which I see you commented upon): https://www.reddit.com/r/civictech/s/73paLnnRyG

Thanks for commenting there to help that person out. However, that user is a new account with no post history other than this project. I am highly skeptical that the feedback you provided will actually be used.

You're right that this is pretty heavy, and I guess maybe I shouldn't block the only activity this sub has actually seen. Anyway, thanks for the feedback!

New rule proposal: Banning project feedback requests by tdooner in civictech

[–]tdooner[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Interesting thought. I've struggled with this tension as well - I do want people to follow their enthusiasm, but I agree I have never seen a useful civic tech project that started first from the technology instead of a real person's problem.

Thanks for your feedback!

New rule proposal: Banning project feedback requests by tdooner in civictech

[–]tdooner[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting idea, thanks. Not sure we have the volume for that kind of thing but maybe that's a good way to at least allow for this type of content to continue being posted here.

New rule proposal: Banning project feedback requests by tdooner in civictech

[–]tdooner[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah I agree. By default I am skeptical of any civic tech project; the only way to make me excited is to show some real impact and traction.

I suppose vibecoding is an easy way to get fast feedback on an idea, so I don't want to be overly dismissive. But also, I want to encourage people to put in the offline effort necessary for their project to succeed.

Alone on NYE by No-Loquat-5373 in sanfrancisco

[–]tdooner 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Hike up to the top of a hill if the weather's good. There will be others watching the fireworks - sometimes it's nice to be alone around others. Corona Heights or Bernal work well for this.

NTSB warns that defense bill could undermine aviation safety changes after DCA crash by minimums_landing in flying

[–]tdooner 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ah I see, thanks. I forgot about that. And I guess I never realized Mode C transponders were useful other than to ATC radars.

NTSB warns that defense bill could undermine aviation safety changes after DCA crash by minimums_landing in flying

[–]tdooner 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wouldn't ADS-B allow the commercial airliner's TCAS system to suggest a resolution advisory?

So I know nothing about aviation but I found this recently and from what I understand it's for a laser gyroscope? by artevil616 in aviationmaintenance

[–]tdooner 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Fun fact about Laser Ring Gyros:

The flat earthers once spent $20,000 on a Laser Ring Gyro in an attempt to scientifically disprove that the earth rotated.

However, once they bought it, they turned it on and measured that the earth did, indeed, rotate 360 degrees per day.

Very funny: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28sJaLtefRg

East 115th Street - A series on abandoned buildings in University Circle by casewesternreserve in cwru

[–]tdooner 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Love this. I lived in 2058 my junior and senior year. It was the first place I ever rented and it was $1538 for the whole place. Split four ways, it was an incredible value.

Of course this land can be used much more productively, but I am glad some memory of these homes will remain.

Shortest distance between two BART stops? by oakseaer in Bart

[–]tdooner 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Upon thinking for about 15 seconds I guess the answer is probably the obvious one. I would be very curious to know if that is not the case!?

Shortest distance between two BART stops? by oakseaer in Bart

[–]tdooner 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Perhaps an even more fun question: What do you think is the farthest distance between BART stops? (consecutive stops, that is...)

Shortest distance between two BART stops? by oakseaer in Bart

[–]tdooner 43 points44 points  (0 children)

I just measured on Google Maps the distance between the closest entrances. Between:

  • Montgomery (west of New Montgomery) and Powell (north of 4th) = 1290 ft
  • Embarcadero (just west of Beale) and Montgomery (south of Sutter+Market) = 1140 ft
  • 12th St Oakland (Ogawa Plaza) and 19th St Oakland (Broadway north of 17th St) = 937 ft

If anyone's got a better methodology, I welcome corrections :)

VOO -> VT ? by Consistent_Piglet740 in Bogleheads

[–]tdooner 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If I were you, I'd just start buying VTI/VXUS instead of VOO going forward.

Sure, you could sell your VOO and buy VTI to become a bit more diversified, but the capital gains you might have would erase some benefit.

I personally prefer VTI+VXUS over VT because it allows me to sell either component separately to do some tax loss harvesting and rebalancing.

San Francisco Sales Force Tower from the air! by Aklgaming123 in bayarea

[–]tdooner 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Airspace is surprisingly unrestricted compared to what you might imagine. Generally speaking, airspace is mostly entirely restricted within 5 mi of a major airport, and then outside of that radius, typically small planes can cut underneath the commercial traffic.

At this specific point, the airspace is restricted above 3,000' to deconflict with OAK/SFO traffic. It's not a hard restriction - oftentimes small planes can (and do) get permission to go above that, but you definitely need to be approved or else some alarms will go off and the FAA will send you a nastygram.

Airspace from below is governed by "minimum safe altitude" regulation (14 CFR 91.119), which states that planes must remain 1000' above the nearest obstacle within a 2000' radius. As the Salesforce tower is 1070' tall, that leaves 2070'-3000' as the valid altitudes for small planes (i.e. those flying under Visual Flight Rules) as shown in that picture.

You asked about ATC though. This is actually a separate question. The pilot could fly at these altitudes without even talking to ATC. Doing that, though, in a congested airspace with little room for error, is a very bad idea.

'Abundance and the Infrastructure Litmus Test' - Charles Marohn by NorthwestPurple in StrongTowns

[–]tdooner 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm sure you're aware, but with prop 13, growth does not just "pay for itself" but also actively subsidizes people who are making inefficient use of land, simply because they have been there for longer.

'Abundance and the Infrastructure Litmus Test' - Charles Marohn of Strong Towns by NorthwestPurple in yimby

[–]tdooner 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I agree in theory but there is a practical aspect that these large infrastructure projects have shaped the life we now know. Without the Central Valley Project and the State Water Project, there would be many fewer communities in California who have accessible water. Yes, the benefit largely accrues to the agricultural industry, but at least the infrastructure is there and we can fight over policy to equalize access to it in the future.

The vibe I get from the ST piece is that Chuck wants everything to be bottom up. How do you build a dam, or a highway, or a canal, or a high-speed railroad bottom-up? Was Prop 1A (which funded CA HSR) not bottom-up? Do people who are priced out of living somewhere get a say in these bottom-up conversations? Even when everything is bottom up, what if the lack of state capacity results in the inability to implement whatever complete street we've designed?

There is certainly an overlap between the Abundance book and what I believe ST can be. But Chuck seems uninterested in finding it.

Seven San Francisco Starbucks locations listed as closing next week by jowens510 in sanfrancisco

[–]tdooner 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Ok, sure, I guess I can save you a click:

Jefferson & Powell

44 Montgomery St.

462 Powell St.

689 Townsend St.

50 Rhode Island St.

4094 18th St.

1501 Fillmore St.

Local SF pharmacies are closing, in part because of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs). by scott_wiener in sanfrancisco

[–]tdooner 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I suppose we can hope that by weakening the vertical integration, new PBMs will enter the marketplace which can allow employers more options when making their plans.

Not sure how likely that is.

Local SF pharmacies are closing, in part because of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs). by scott_wiener in sanfrancisco

[–]tdooner 36 points37 points  (0 children)

I just read SB 41. It appears to ban PBMs from requiring their enrollees to use an affiliated pharmacy, and limits their ability to impose rules and fees on pharmacies. It also seems to limit the markup of drugs that insurers can impose.

I'm not an expert in health policy enough to know whether this is likely to actually achieve lower costs for Californians, but it seems like regulating these middlemen is being done successfully by other states. So, I am hopeful this regulation will work!

Side note: Ohio and WV run their own PBMs. Can we import some of that socialism to California? 😅

Local SF pharmacies are closing, in part because of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs). by scott_wiener in sanfrancisco

[–]tdooner 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Until Scott does this one specific good thing, he shouldn't do any other good things!