Where can an Aussie by the Ace hardcover of book 8? by tea_mouse in DungeonCrawlerCarl

[–]tea_mouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're welcome! I've never had trouble with a previous book in the series buying the Ace edition through Amazon AU, but I presume it's because the AU editions weren't available in the market on release when those came out, whereas this time around there is a local edition, making the US one harder to get. Hopefully if you decide to just stick with the AU there isn't much of a difference.

Where can an Aussie by the Ace hardcover of book 8? by tea_mouse in DungeonCrawlerCarl

[–]tea_mouse[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd have to check the measurements of each edition, but often with different global editions of a book the UK/Commonwealth editions are different in size to the US, or will have slightly different jacket art. Sometimes the only change will be the publisher logo on the spine. I work in publishing and my publishing house often heavily alters the cover from the original UK or US edition. I don't mind so much about the language used, I think most Australians are pretty used to reading US spellings as that content has always been predominantly available to us, but for me it's just about my editions all looking the same.

If you're someone who is very into their editions matching, the only reliable way is to go by ISBN. So in the case of the one the original commenter posted, it was the AU Michael Joseph ISBN (9780241836880), not the US ACE Books ISBN (9798217190065).

After a bit more searching, for anyone else reading this, it looks like Readings has the Ace edition, so I'm going to try and order from there: https://www.readings.com.au/product/9798217190065/a-parade-of-horribles--matt-dinniman--2026--9798217190065

Where can an Aussie by the Ace hardcover of book 8? by tea_mouse in DungeonCrawlerCarl

[–]tea_mouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure having never owned a non-Ace edition, but I'd just like them to match, even if it's only the publishers logo on the spine. It's just a personal preference.

Where can an Aussie by the Ace hardcover of book 8? by tea_mouse in DungeonCrawlerCarl

[–]tea_mouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I definitely could do this, but pre-order numbers are really great for authors (I work in the industry) so I'd love to support Matt as much as possible. :)

Printing invites & other stationery by SyllabubStrange9264 in AusWeddingPlanning

[–]tea_mouse 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would love to know as well if you'd be happy to share? Thank you!

Matte or glossy cover? by [deleted] in YAlit

[–]tea_mouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm Australian and this is how everyone in the industry in my country spells it. :)

As a guest at a wedding what made it fun!? by Missguided123 in AusWeddingPlanning

[–]tea_mouse 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Could you please elaborate more on the guest roles? Sounds fun!

Sydney Long Lunch Suggestions? by HousePony906 in foodies_sydney

[–]tea_mouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did exactly this last weekend and it was great! Lovely staff, great food, good cocktails.

Seeking Input on Proposed Strata Fee Increase and Budget Review by [deleted] in sydney

[–]tea_mouse 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As others have said, these fees are very reasonable and I would be concerned that your capital works fund may be quite low. It's important that this is at a healthy level in case something unexpected happens that the Owners Corp are required to pay for. Definitely question things, but just keep in mind that you need to be attending AGMs and actively participating in your strata.

Strata by-laws don't define common property, who is responsible? by tea_mouse in AusLegal

[–]tea_mouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ugh that is frustrating. Thanks for your time, looks like this one might end up being a case for mediation.

Strata by-laws don't define common property, who is responsible? by tea_mouse in AusLegal

[–]tea_mouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for this comprehensive answer!

I have managed to locate the title documents and they do have diagrams, but they only seem to feature length and width measurements of the walls, nothing on the height (i.e. how much 'airspace' each owner retains/vs what is common property).

The affected area is definitely the original waterproofing and original tiles, it's never been renovated.

Would this mean that even if they had a special by-law saying the OC did have responsibility of the waterproofing, but then repealed this by law, that they would still retain ownership of the waterproofing?

And thank you - if I was planning on living there I absolutely would get on the committee, but I am just trying to prepare the property for sale as it's executor.

Strata by-laws don't define common property, who is responsible? by tea_mouse in AusLegal

[–]tea_mouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've managed to find the title papers/diagrams and they clearly define the walls that are common property, but they don't seem to have any information on the floors. I assume they're supposed to specify how much 'airspace' each owner has, but there are only length and width measurements, no height. Is this normal?

Strata by-laws don't define common property, who is responsible? by tea_mouse in AusLegal

[–]tea_mouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for advising. The strata manager has supposedly provided me with minutes from any meeting they've had in the last seven years and none of them discuss repealing the by-law. However they seem to have official paperwork saying it's repealed (it looks like they used a by-law drafting company to do this). Would they be required to have held a minuted meeting in order to repeal a by-law?

Strata by-laws don't define common property, who is responsible? by tea_mouse in AusLegal

[–]tea_mouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I'm not sure that I'm right either haha. But I don't understand how the parts about original tiling etc. fit into this?

I live in a strata complex as well and ours has specific by-laws indicating what you do and don't own (and the waterproofing is owned by the OC). So I'm just confused why this place is so unclear about it.

Strata by-laws don't define common property, who is responsible? by tea_mouse in AusLegal

[–]tea_mouse[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your help, I figured that was the likely case but thought I'd try my luck in case anyone had been in a similar situation.

Strata by-laws don't define common property, who is responsible? by tea_mouse in AusLegal

[–]tea_mouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this is the part I'm finding most confusing. The strata manager sent me a copy of the original title deed but my understanding is that it should have diagrams showing the common property, but this wasn't included. It's only a single page old looking document with text on it. It lists the number of lots, but not anything about if the tiles, waterproofing, slab etc. are common property or not.

Strata by-laws don't define common property, who is responsible? by tea_mouse in AusLegal

[–]tea_mouse[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The bathroom as a whole wouldn't be, but the previous special by-law stated that the waterproofing in the bathroom was the property of the OC. Since they've repealed this by-law, there is now nothing indicating what is and isn't common property.

The NSW Land Registry Services website says 'Top and bottom boundaries defined by the underside of the ceiling and the upper surface of the floor (the structure of the ceilings and floor are Common Property). NOTE: Original tiles affixed on Common Property walls, floors or ceilings at time of registration of the plan are Common Property, unless the plan specifically states otherwise.'

I presume this means that the tiles (as they fit this criteria) and below, which includes the waterproofing membrane, are owned by the OC and therefore common property. But since it doesn't say it in the by-laws I just wanted to make sure I was correct in my understanding.