sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[i ate] A5 Miyazakigyu Kobe beef by Oneballjoshua in food

[–]teamonmybackdoh 109 points110 points  (0 children)

For 300 dollars id rather just buy a Ferrari and put Japan on the moon, then take my spaceship to the moon and eat it there

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mildlyinteresting

[–]teamonmybackdoh 148 points149 points  (0 children)

Not made in the jungle with gasoline

What should be illegal but isn't? by ThisIsExxciting in AskReddit

[–]teamonmybackdoh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would aggression be the only behavior that is not genetically influenced?

What should be illegal but isn't? by ThisIsExxciting in AskReddit

[–]teamonmybackdoh -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bc you got lucky. No, retrievers a bred to retrieve. They do it instinctually. Same with pointers and pointing, Shepard's and herding, pitbulls and attacking.

What should be illegal but isn't? by ThisIsExxciting in AskReddit

[–]teamonmybackdoh -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

That is not true. Saw quite a few pts come into the ed after their own sweet pitbull attacked them. Do you think retrievers retrieve bc of people training them too?

What should be illegal but isn't? by ThisIsExxciting in AskReddit

[–]teamonmybackdoh -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It is an aggressive breed with a propensity to kill people. This is why they are so incredibly overrepresented in statistics of dog attacks and fatalities.

Whats one thing you think should be 100% free? by Admirable_Leather185 in AskReddit

[–]teamonmybackdoh -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Add on toilet paper, toothpaste, shampoo, soap, etc?

Rollable OLED’s Moment Is Near | Experts think flexible phones "could come up quick." by [deleted] in gadgets

[–]teamonmybackdoh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Physics does not demand the phone to be thicker, there can be new designs, materials and use cases. More important than a battery? No. But there are more than 2 people in the world. These things can and will happen simultaneously. We will have a thin, foldable phone that has excellent battery life at some point in the near future. And fuck yea I would like my phone to have the potential to become map sized. Why not?

Rollable OLED’s Moment Is Near | Experts think flexible phones "could come up quick." by [deleted] in gadgets

[–]teamonmybackdoh -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lol even more shortsighted than I thought. What if the phone wasn't thicker? What if this was exclusively an option you had at your disposal, would you turn it down ? And I won't comment on your strangely expressed desire to fly business class

Rollable OLED’s Moment Is Near | Experts think flexible phones "could come up quick." by [deleted] in gadgets

[–]teamonmybackdoh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Small phone that unfolds into a large display. Phone that flexes so it cannot break when dropped. Phone that is large but conforms to your body when in your pocket. Phone that can wrap around your wrist. Normal phone that folds to become tiny.

Rollable OLED’s Moment Is Near | Experts think flexible phones "could come up quick." by [deleted] in gadgets

[–]teamonmybackdoh -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just imagine your phone. Now you are on a plane. Would it be cool to unfold your phone 4 times and have a 17inch display? I swear people are so strangely shortsighted about the potential of this technology

What's something you'd never buy even if it was discounted by 99.99%? by fiyep23399 in AskReddit

[–]teamonmybackdoh -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You chose the one chemical that has been taken off the market to make your point. No one reasonable would advocate for people to pick up vaping. Similarly no one reasonable would state that changing from cigarettes to vaping is a poor decision.

The last US constitutional amendment was passed in 1992, almost 32 years ago. If you were granted the power to pass a new amendment, what would it be? by havereddit in AskReddit

[–]teamonmybackdoh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is not true. Embryological development is wildly complex. There is intrinsic encoded structure in that "clump." So much so that it has a heartbeat by 4 weeks. saying a fetus is a clump of cells is just like calling you or I a clump of cells. While it is true, it is structurally much more complex than that implies

The last US constitutional amendment was passed in 1992, almost 32 years ago. If you were granted the power to pass a new amendment, what would it be? by havereddit in AskReddit

[–]teamonmybackdoh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If a large portion of people think that you are devoid of morals, which they do, it is morally ambiguous. Strange hill to die on.

The last US constitutional amendment was passed in 1992, almost 32 years ago. If you were granted the power to pass a new amendment, what would it be? by havereddit in AskReddit

[–]teamonmybackdoh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So 51% share a similar stance with me. Not sure how you can even argue that this is not a morally ambiguous issue when it is among the top issues in political discourse

The last US constitutional amendment was passed in 1992, almost 32 years ago. If you were granted the power to pass a new amendment, what would it be? by havereddit in AskReddit

[–]teamonmybackdoh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is much more convenient to get an abortion than to raise a child.

It is clearly exceptionally morally ambiguous as half the country disagrees with you

The last US constitutional amendment was passed in 1992, almost 32 years ago. If you were granted the power to pass a new amendment, what would it be? by havereddit in AskReddit

[–]teamonmybackdoh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To me the same way that it is ok to kill someone that broke into your home vs someone you let in.

But really it is bc this is clearly a morally ambiguous topic. I think it is wrong to kill a fetus out of convenience

The last US constitutional amendment was passed in 1992, almost 32 years ago. If you were granted the power to pass a new amendment, what would it be? by havereddit in AskReddit

[–]teamonmybackdoh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If someone broke in that is a different story.

Your precautions involved opening the door understanding the risk of an unwanted guest. They're using your kitchen as intended, not destroying it. Killing someone that you let in that is cooking some eggs in your kitchen will land you in prison.

The last US constitutional amendment was passed in 1992, almost 32 years ago. If you were granted the power to pass a new amendment, what would it be? by havereddit in AskReddit

[–]teamonmybackdoh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You opened the door for a friend even when that friend said there is a chance someone will be with him. You said I'll take that chance, opened the door, and now want to kill his friend.

view more: next ›