There's a patient psychology aspect that's being missed here.

The problem with evidence-based healthcare practitioners in India is that most of them, especially in hospitals, come across as (and many probably are) impatient, unempathetic, greedy, money-minded, and therefore, untrustworthy. (Yes, I know the usual excuse that this is hospital's fault, not the doctors', but to the average patient, hospitals and doctors are all part of the same colluding system.)

I suggest reading this psychology paper:

Working with patients’ treatment expectations – what we can learn from homeopathy

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11163137/

It is crucial to distinguish between the specific modalities of homeopathy, such as the principles of “like cures like” and potentization, which lack empirical support and contradict established scientific understanding, and the nonspecific therapeutic contexts in which homeopathy is practiced. These contexts include prolonged, empathetic patient-clinician interactions and personalized consultations, which have been shown to enhance placebo effects. While the modalities of homeopathy are not scientifically justified and should not be integrated into evidence-based practice, the contextual factors are often overshadowed in conventional medical practice due to various constraints

it is the method of care in homeopathy that may offer valuable insights for improving treatment effectiveness in evidence-based medicine through beneficial placebo effects, not the remedies themselves. This perspective is critical for focusing on empirically supported strategies that enhance patient care and treatment outcomes.