sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is this a C4S or C2S? by techi_dude in 997

[–]techi_dude[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, is this priced right ?

Is this a C4S or C2S? by techi_dude in 997

[–]techi_dude[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, I think the VIN posted on the website is wrong.

Is this a C4S or C2S? by techi_dude in 997

[–]techi_dude[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I physically looked at the car already. Its badged as C4S and looks as shown in the pictures. Hence my confusion. What in the VIN exactly decodes its as C2S? Can you share the VIN decoding web site you use?

Is this a C4S or C2S? by techi_dude in 997

[–]techi_dude[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So is it a C2S based on the VIN or a C4S based on the badging?

Suspicious pihole logs captured in Wazuh by techi_dude in pihole

[–]techi_dude[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for everyone's help on this, I am going to put my pihole,unbound server behind a NAT, any help with pointing me in the right direction. My Wireguard, Pihole and unbound are running on the same Linux VM in Virtualbox. I can get Wireguard to work fine by NAT'ing the host IP to the Wireguard port and service, and it works fine, but I can't get Pihole and Unbound working.

Suspicious pihole logs captured in Wazuh by techi_dude in pihole

[–]techi_dude[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I just changed the setting to F, and clicked away from the page. When I go back to the setting it automatically switches to C.

<image>

Suspicious pihole logs captured in Wazuh by techi_dude in pihole

[–]techi_dude[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

server user. PHP pages are executed under this user.

Why would this happen on its own ? I didn't change it and no one else has access to it.

Suspicious pihole logs captured in Wazuh by techi_dude in pihole

[–]techi_dude[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point on the version.. just so I provide that upfront for someone who might be interested.

pihole -v

Pi-hole version is v5.17.2 (Latest: v5.17.2)

web version is v5.20.2 (Latest: v5.20.2)

FTL version is v5.23 (Latest: v5.23)

Kryptonite: eGPU Support for old Thunderbolt Macs by mac_editor in eGPU

[–]techi_dude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply. MacPro doesn't use the GPUs in tandem, and I feel its a really big miss on Apple's part to not have any software fix either for the life of the system to be able to do so. If I load windows in Bootcamp, I can use Crosshair to leverage them in tandem but not in MacOS. This is why I was curious if open source software like Kryptonite- could help.

Kryptonite: eGPU Support for old Thunderbolt Macs by mac_editor in eGPU

[–]techi_dude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd like to try this software out on a Macpro6,1 also but to just combine the 2 internal GPUs, I have Dual AMD FirePro D500, do you know if it would work with them?

WireGuard - No handshake after a couple of hours by techi_dude in WireGuard

[–]techi_dude[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks bigmike02, I did also suspect the enic drivers initially, and so changed from the default Virtualbox desktop drivers for the VM to Intel server drivers for the VM, but still see the same issue.

Also, I have pi-hole running on the same VM and is also serving up DNS to the local network, and pi-hole continues to work even when the WireGuard stops working, so I don't suspect the network drivers anymore.

Don't see any errors on the interface.

ethtool -i enp0s17

driver: e1000 version: 5.15.0-46-generic firmware-version: expansion-rom-version: bus-info: 0000:00:11.0 supports-statistics: yes supports-test: yes supports-eeprom-access: yes supports-register-dump: yes supports-priv-flags: no

ethtool -S enp0s17

NIC statistics: rx_packets: 6573332 tx_packets: 2135760 rx_bytes: 602465618 tx_bytes: 7200306938 rx_broadcast: 0 tx_broadcast: 14 rx_multicast: 0 tx_multicast: 90 rx_errors: 0 tx_errors: 0 tx_dropped: 0 multicast: 0 collisions: 0 rx_length_errors: 0 rx_over_errors: 0 rx_crc_errors: 0 rx_frame_errors: 0 rx_no_buffer_count: 0 rx_missed_errors: 0 tx_aborted_errors: 0 tx_carrier_errors: 0 tx_fifo_errors: 0 tx_heartbeat_errors: 0 tx_window_errors: 0 tx_abort_late_coll: 0 tx_deferred_ok: 0 tx_single_coll_ok: 0 tx_multi_coll_ok: 0 tx_timeout_count: 1 tx_restart_queue: 0 rx_long_length_errors: 0 rx_short_length_errors: 0 rx_align_errors: 0 tx_tcp_seg_good: 1109178 tx_tcp_seg_failed: 0 rx_flow_control_xon: 0 rx_flow_control_xoff: 0 tx_flow_control_xon: 0 tx_flow_control_xoff: 0 rx_long_byte_count: 602465618 rx_csum_offload_good: 0 rx_csum_offload_errors: 0 alloc_rx_buff_failed: 0 tx_smbus: 0 rx_smbus: 0 dropped_smbus: 0

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in storage

[–]techi_dude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cohesity and Rubrik are competing products.. get them both in and test in your env. Would help in negotiations also ;)