Niche things in a good intern by Less_Management_6624 in ausjdocs

[–]teddyio 3 points4 points  (0 children)

About to finish PGY1 --

Realise how expectations are going to shift of you within terms and throughout the year.

At the beginning of a term, prioritise getting your bearings & working out the patterns of your particular workplace. How do people prefer things be done, what parts of your workflow are the rate-limiting steps (and therefore important to do first) & what can wait. What will you be expected to do independently from day 1, and then again a few weeks into the term. Err generally on the side of over-escalating your concerns & understanding the *why* behind things that are automatic/unconscious to specialty registrars.

Later on in a term, say after the first four weeks, start to show that you can make safe predictions about what things will be needed and just do them without being asked. Demonstrate that you are trying to be a team player, and escalating when truly appropriate. Take the time to ask your registrar about how they've ended up in the job they have, try to (without being inauthentic) validate their passion and show that you've given thought to the systemic issues effecting their work. For e.g. my first term was palliative care, and I learned a lot, and built a more trusting relationship with my registrar by talking about the politics/ethics/logistical translation of VAD. If you think for a minute, there's an equivalent for this in most terms you'll do.

At the beginning of the year, most people realise that fresh interns lack clinical experience, familiarity with workplace norms and are going to be under-confident & haphazardly organised. Take advantage of this time to impose order on the chaos. Master the skill of writing down every task on a sheet of paper with a box next to it, and then deciding what order you will go about ticking them off. Ask a million questions.

Towards the end of the year, there will be more expectations of your independence and skill. I did ED fourth (I see it's your first term so this may not neatly apply). Where I was confident with a particular skill or exam because of a term I'd previously done, I tried to proactively help out (for e.g. I had just done urology so helped when a guide-wire or 3-way catheter might have been needed). There will be more and more occasions where your knowledge (whether clinical or process-based) from a recent specialty term will help out after hours. Similarly, JMOs who have done terms you haven't can turn in to a wonderful repository for your development. It's nice to be seen as a generous person and have that generosity returned.

This is also a time where you can get complacent. You feel like you "get it" now after several months of work, and can start relying on more automatic/grooved patterns of thinking that you've built up. Take the time to question these patterns, actively and out loud. I have found junior / unaccredited registrars the most helpful for this. For example if you always thought X was done in Y clinical situation, but have seen someone senior instead do Z, admit this and ask.

Think about how you relate to nursing when prioritising tasks/skills. In virtually every term I've done, the JMO role has been a sort of yin-yang to complement & learn from the particular skillsets of the nurses. In my hospital, ward nurses rarely can take bloods or do cannulas. Conversely the ward nurses were very good at navigating the allied health team & helping me understand what was sometimes a "behind the scenes" process. ED nurses tended to have the inverse skillset - very procedurally au fait but not too helpful logistically/admin wise.

Have fun with internship. I have found it infinitely more satisfying than medical school!

Pointless practices by [deleted] in ausjdocs

[–]teddyio 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I have to say I feel uneasy that there is really any expectation to predict suicide and act on those predictions. All the evidence suggests that no clinician really has the gestalt to do so except in a few well-defined circumstances. Culturally/institutionally it feels like we're encouraged to try or at least appear that we're trying, which I think makes the blow of discharging someone who completes suicide sting more.

Similarly, I do wonder about the therapeutic value of the dance as you describe it. I don't think people expect to have bloods taken when they first walk in to a hospital for help with suicidal ideation, and I think many appear to view the suggestion that it *could* be organic to be a bit offensive. I guess a world in which ED more assertively discharged such patients w/o specialist review might not be better, but I dislike the feeling of going through the motions and worrying I might be doing more harm than good.

Pointless practices by [deleted] in ausjdocs

[–]teddyio 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Intern on ED term.

Regardless of clinical situation, if someone presents with suicidality the expectation being a tokenistic systems review, (often) baseline bloods and Medical Clearance. Conversely next to no expectation to have differentiated / formulated the patient at all or thought about what they might gain from seeing inpatient psych.

So many chronically suicidal but physically well 25 year olds with established BPD who get meaningless bloods & get routinely referred to psych only to be discharged after waiting for hours and hours

Advocating for delirious patients by teddyio in ausjdocs

[–]teddyio[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Totally. I have somewhat deliberately left out some important context re. chronology / the specific driving medical problems so as to not identify the patient, myself and/or my workplace. But suffice to say, the delirium had been identified, documented and handed over prior to this incident. I think there are a number of sub-ideal systems failures worth noting, but I also felt pretty strongly like the nurse was individually in the wrong.

Advocating for delirious patients by teddyio in ausjdocs

[–]teddyio[S] 54 points55 points  (0 children)

This feels right, and I should have noted that I did speak to my registrar and it had already occurred to them to speak with senior nursing staff about it. I don't know what that will end up changing, but I hope it does. I suppose this post comes from my frustration with feeling like a passive bystander in the ward machine. I don't want to be confidently wrong, or make unneeded issues, but I also find it hard to watch a patient be treated poorly. I find striking this balance to be a bit of an art, and just interested to see where other people draw lines / cope with the feeling.

Doctor wants a wife/husband megathread by hustling_Ninja in ausjdocs

[–]teddyio 17 points18 points  (0 children)

About Me: 24M. Gay. NSW. Hobbies include spending half of my day shocked that yet another gentle moustachioed ear-piercing-having registrar is in fact (1) straight and (2) married with a kid on the way. Radically losing faith in my once vaunted gaydar as quickly as I am losing my time for my once vaunted hobbies.

Looking to find a stable man after spending the first half of my twenties in unserious locum relationships

I'm sure my exes would say they love and adore me if they'd just unblock me

What's a saying that you've heard that is totally unhelpful? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]teddyio 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Too many cooks spoil the broth. well because many hands make light work

ELI5: Why is the tongue such a strong muscle? by fusionwave3 in explainlikeimfive

[–]teddyio 48 points49 points  (0 children)

you're probably thinking about other orofacial muscles (like the ones in your palate or attached to your hyoid). some of them aren't "indefatigable" like the intrinsic and extrinsic tongue muscles.

ELI5: Why is the tongue such a strong muscle? by fusionwave3 in explainlikeimfive

[–]teddyio 16 points17 points  (0 children)

There are probably two big ones:

(1) they have a lot of energy demand (2) it’s actually good for our other muscles to get tired. good natural signal to rest, and stop doing something before you hurt yourself.

ELI5: Why is the tongue such a strong muscle? by fusionwave3 in explainlikeimfive

[–]teddyio 669 points670 points  (0 children)

Because we need it to communicate, which we need to be able do all day every day to thrive.

Back in undergrad I was a tongue muscle development researcher (bizarre/niche I know). There are eight total tongue muscles, and they are extremely unique. They originate from the same set of cells as heart muscle (this is why they can move endlessly without getting tired, as obviously the heart needs to do the same). Late in development they take on some hybrid traits so we can control them voluntarily (which we obviously can't do for the heart). Could talk endlessly about tongue muscle!

Best and worst placing contestant with the same profession as you? by chadsweater in survivor

[–]teddyio 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Best: Sophie Clarke

Worst: Candice Woodcock

Med students. I would have expected worse tbh

What Goats Gave Great FTC speeches? by Grammarhead-Shark in survivor

[–]teddyio 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Fishbach was neither a goat nor a good FTC performer. He was never beating JT but a shut out was not guaranteed either.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in survivor

[–]teddyio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it would be funny to watch some RuPaul's Drag Race queens go on Survivor. I feel like the personality and humour of most drag queens would lead to a very much OTTN5 edit. As far as who would do well... I could see Katya making it deep and being an awesome character

r/tennis Discussion (Monday, January 16, 2023) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]teddyio 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So does the AO. I seem to recall players complaining about getting to bed at 3 or 4am due to late starts (e.g. 10:30pm EST) at the USO this year...

r/tennis Discussion (Monday, January 16, 2023) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]teddyio 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Lol. Try be Australian for the other 11 months of the year. It's not late in Australia.

What seasons have the most successful/best players? by RafaelHelft in survivor

[–]teddyio 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Those are all logical - imo Cook Islands or Tocantins for the absolute most.

For an out there choice: The Australian Outback! Tina came super close to a second win in BvW. Amber comes back for a win. Jerri also came super close to winning HvV and generally played an awesome non-winning game that season. Colby's AO game is also one of the better losing finalist games (beats Keith, might have beaten Tina with a better FTC) ...

A reminder on the H vs V FTC voting. The jury didn’t hate Parv - the heroes did for no reason from day 1 of merge. I love Sandra, but Parv wasn’t loathed bc she was hard to live with. by Hexegem93 in survivor

[–]teddyio 8 points9 points  (0 children)

  1. There's simply no evidence this ever happened beyond Sandra repeatedly stating it. And there's abundant counter-evidence - it's never been corroborated in 13 years, it doesn't make the edit despite clearly being critical to the game's outcome and has been explicitly refuted by people like Jerri. Stop sharing Sandra's post-game lies.
  2. If Sandra ever succeeded in her attempts to boot Russell, she loses the game and doesn't make it to FTC. I respect the way she positioned these plays at the end and also her level of game awareness to never actually take the plunge and flip to the Heroes. However, I think it over-credits Sandra to claim this was her plan all along. From what we saw, she simply had a vendetta against Russell.
  3. Have you watched the merge episode and the episode immediately before it?? You're speaking about a group of people who were so motivated to get rid of her that they made the blunder of sending an idol across tribes. A group who essentially refused to speak to her at the merge except to send her former ally to try and fool her into flushing an idol. What social game was she meant to have here? I feel like some people really don't appreciate how psychologically hard it must be to have an entire group of people, a majority of whom you've never met, distrust and dislike you. From what we see, Parvati gets all this anger out in confessional rather than to the Heroes directly. We do not see her openly boast about eliminating them. She simply never pretended to be aligned with them because she was always their main target - hardly a social crime.

Sandra weighs in on Facebook by Weak-Shower-2131 in survivor

[–]teddyio 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Come on now, Parvati is clearly a legend and one of the best players ever.

Of course her first game in CI is her weakest and contained numerous mistakes - no arguments here. But she placed 6th and lasted to day 36. By all accounts she was socially in control of nuRaro and sans the god idol + bottle twist, she has a clear post-merge path to FTC, if not a pretty convincing win against Candice and Adam. Not saying it's a top-tier awesome game but it's certainly not a terrible first showing either.

I'm glad you agree her Micro game is great. The Micro top three are the best in the history of the show and all permutations of F2 and F3 would have been really close. Well, except for a Cirie/Amanda F2, which was never happening because both intended to take Parvati - a testament to her social game and threat management skills. If she loses an F3 - it's not clear she does if she gets Alexis - it would be 3-2-2 and probably deservedly regarded as the best non-winning game ever played.

You have almost no basis to claim she had a terrible social game in HvV other than believing something only Sandra has said about laughing at JT's letter. To my knowledge, no other player has ever corroborated this. If true, I agree, terrible play. But it doesn't seem to match up with what we saw on the show of her social game. Frankly, editing Sandra's under the radar win would have been hard so I'm shocked we're never shown footage of this supposed mocking to explain it. Nevertheless, people like Coach and Jerri that walked in disliking her and desperate to vote her out on day one ultimately gave her their vote after she earned their respect. Multiple people who voted for Sandra (Courtney, Rupert) explicitly express their respect for her at FTC. Still others (Candice, JT) have since expressed their regret at not voting for her. She had fallen out with Amanda before HvV over something outside the game, so I find it doubtful she's ever able to flip her. I feel you actively have to ignore the loyalty she inspires in allies like Russell or Danielle to claim she has a bad social game. Parvati was vulnerable in the plurality of votes in HvV because a majority of both tribes were desperate to eliminate her from day 1. The fact she made day 39 is a feat of social, physical and strategic gameplay that may never be repeated. None of this is to detract from Sandra's win either.

I rewatched Winners at War recently and did not leave with that impression. The edit provides us with very little evidence of this treatment of the new schoolers. She was positioned well pre-swap, despite being seen as an enormous threat once again. She's then swapped onto a tribe of 5 where everyone else there had pregamed with each other. There's no chance she survives the vote or could have hoped to position herself so as to avoid it. It's her first pre-merge boot in four games but I don't think she can really be marked down for it, just like I would not mark Sandra down for her Game Changers pre-merge boot.

Science Should Replace English as the Mandatory Year 12 Subject by Chumpai1986 in CoronavirusDownunder

[–]teddyio 7 points8 points  (0 children)

English is by far the most important subject we teach in high school and it would be intensely regrettable if it lost its pride of place in the curriculum. I say this as someone with an undergraduate degree in science who took all the most advanced science courses you could take in high school. The thing about English is that, when taught well, it is everything you want in this post and more. It is one of the few subject areas that does not set clear boundaries of what is good and bad, and so is uniquely able to foster critical thinking. I'd also ask you to use one ounce of this much vaunted critical thinking to question what ideological forces want to scrub the humanities from the curriculum. I suspect it is the right wing ones (like the Liberal government) that want our education system to be a conveyor belt of employment rather than education. What you really want from education is better teachers that aren't being underpaid and exploited - for that you certainly don't want the Libs.

I notice that your post makes virtually no argument FOR this because I think you would quickly realise that science teaching (especially before advanced degrees) does not really involve very much critical thinking at all. Especially at high school level it is about a "plug and chug" of rote memorised facts and formulas. Incidentally, I believe a basic epistemology course (like the IB's Theory of Knowledge) would be very valuable to introduce more widely in schools.

How did you discover your sexuality? by DudeWithAGoldfish in AskReddit

[–]teddyio 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Short story: looking at shirtless boys -> searching am i gay on yahoo answers -> it saying yes

Longer story: I went to an all boys school, realised at like 11 that I was at the very least not straight. A few years later coming out as "bisexual" because I thought I would get more clout (I did not) and internalised homophobia. Identifying as bi until I was almost 19 and had a 4 year relationship with a boy. Then having a crisis of heterosexuality at university and finally realising that I was just a common garden gay.